Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethics and the Emergency Care of the Seriously Ill and Injured Elderly Patient

  • Emergency Medicine (FA Luchette and RP Gonzalez, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Geriatrics Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethics in western medicine is governed by four basic principles: nonmaleficence, beneficence, autonomy, and justice. Acutely ill and injured elderly patients often present ethical challenges to the physician as they attempt to balance conflicting ethical priorities. Healthcare decisions in the elderly are made more complex by numerous factors such as advances in surgical care that may lengthen life yet worsen quality of life, allocation of resources, disparities of care, the presence of dementia, and need for surrogate decision makers. Communication is a key factor in providing the best possible care to the acutely ill and injured elderly patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Percival T. Medical ethics: or a code of institutes and precepts adapted to the professional conduct of physicians and surgeons. 3rd ed. London: John Churchill; 1849. p. 27–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Medical Association. Code of medical ethics of the american medical association council on ethical and judicial affairs. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living http://www.aoa.gov//Aging_Statistics/Profile/2013/4.aspx. Accessed 18 Feb 2015.

  4. Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, Ohene-Yeboah M, Uranues S, Vega Rivera F, et al. Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e9–22. This articles discusses the significance of emergency surgery global burden of disease.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Desserud KF, Veen T, Søreide K. Emergency general surgery in the geriatric patient. Br J Surg. 2015. This is a nice review of emergency general surgery in the elderly patient.

  6. American Hospital Association. A patient’s bill of rights. Chicago: American Hospital Association; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Temimi M, Griffee M, Ennis TM, Preston R, Vargo D, Overton S, et al. When is death inevitable after emergency laparotomy? Analysis of the American College of Surgeons national surgical quality improvement program database. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:503–11. This article looks at mortality following emergency laparotomy using data from NSQIP.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rangel EL, Cooper Z, Olufajo OA, Reznor G, Lipsitz SR, Salim A, et al. Mortality after emergency surgery continues to rise after discharge in the elderly: predictors of 1-year mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(3):349–58. This articles points out a doubling of death in elderly patients requiring emergency surgery from 30 days to 1 year.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, Syin D, Bandeen-Roche K, Patel P, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(6):901–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990, sections 4206 and 4751 of Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990. Public Law 101–508. 1990.

  11. Gillon R. The principle of double effect and medical ethics. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6514):193–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper Z, Courtwright A, Karlage A, Gawande A, Block S. Pitfalls in communication that lead to nonbeneficial emergency surgery in elderly patients with serious illness: description of the problem and elements of a solution. Ann Surg. 2014;260(6):949–57. This is an important article because of its discussion of communication pitfalls in patients that require emergency surgery.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson BT, Cox PN, Antonelli M, et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU: statement of the 5th international consensus conference in critical care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003: executive summary. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(8):1781–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cocanour CS. End-of-life care in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(6):891–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murray PM. The history of informed consent. Iowa Orthop J. 1990;10:104–9.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Giampieri M. Communication and informed consent in elderly people. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78(2):236–42. This is an excellent review of best practices for obtaining consent in the elderly patient.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moye J, Marson DC. Assessment of decision-making capacity in older adults: an emerging area of practice and research. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007;62(1):P3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Silveira MJ, Kim SY, Langa KM. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1211.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, Johnston CB, Hamel MB, Lynn J, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S187–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fritsch J, Petronio S, Helft PR, Torke AM. Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: ethical factors considered by family surrogates. J Clin Ethics. 2013;24(2):125–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hickman SE, Sabatino CP, Moss AH, Nester JW. The POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) paradigm to improve end-of-life care: potential state legal barriers to implementation. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36(1):119–40, 4.

  22. In re Quinlan, 355 A2d 647, 671 (NJ 1976).

  23. Teno JM, Gruneir A, Schwartz Z, Nanda A, Wetle T. Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(2):189–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. American College of Surgeons. Statement on advance directives by patients: “do not resuscitate” in the operating room. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2014;99(1):42–3. The American College of Surgeon’s Committee on Ethics statement on dealing with the patient who has a DNR order and needs to go to the operating room.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maerz LL, Mosenthal AC, Miller RS, Cotton BA, Kirton OC. Futility and the acute care surgeon. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(6):1216–9. This article summarizes futility and how it relates to the acute care surgeon and it describes the results of a survey on futility.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McCullough LB, Jones JW. Postoperative futility: a clinical algorithm for setting limits. Br J Surg. 2001;88(9):1153–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine S. Cocanour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Christine S. Cocanour declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Emergency Medicine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cocanour, C.S. Ethics and the Emergency Care of the Seriously Ill and Injured Elderly Patient. Curr Geri Rep 5, 55–61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-016-0156-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-016-0156-y

Keywords

Navigation