Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome of Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC) prospective dose-finding trials of I-125 balloon brachytherapy in high-grade gliomas: challenges in clinical trial design and technology development when MRI treatment effect and recurrence appear similar

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Radiation Oncology

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to define the maximal safe radiation dose to guide further study of the GliaSite balloon brachytherapy (GSBT) system in untreated newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NEW-GBM) and recurrent high-grade glioma (REC-HGG). GBST is a balloon placed in the resection cavity and later filled through a subcutaneous port with liquid I-125 Iotrex, providing radiation doses that diminish uniformly with distance from the balloon surface.

Methods

The Adult Brain Tumor Consortium initiated prospective dose-finding studies to determine maximum tolerated dose in NEW-GBM treated before standard RT or after surgery for REC-HGG. Patients were inevaluable if there was progression before the 90-day posttreatment toxicity evaluation point.

Results

Ten NEW-GBM patients had the balloon placed, and 2/10 reached the 90 day timepoint. Five REC-HGG enrolled and two were assessable at the 90-day evaluation endpoint. Imaging progression occurred before 90-day evaluation in 7/12 treated patients. The trials were closed as too few patients were assessable to allow dose escalation, although no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Median survival from treatment was 15.3 months (95 % CI 7.1–23.6) for NEW-GBM and 12.8 months (95 % CI 4.2–20.9) for REC-HGG.

Conclusion

These trials failed to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for further testing as early imaging changes, presumed to be progression, were common and interfered with the assessment of treatment-related toxicity. The survival outcomes in these and other related studies, although based on small populations, suggest that GSBT may be worthy of further study using clinical and survival endpoints, rather than standard imaging results. The implications for local therapy development are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stubbs JB, Frankel RH, Schultz K, Crocker I, Dillehay D, Olson JJ (2002) Preclinical evaluation of a novel device for delivering brachytherapy to the margins of resected brain tumor cavities. J Neurosurg 96(2):335–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stubbs JB, Strickland AD, Frank RK, Simon J, McMillan K, Williams JA (2000) Biodistribution and dosimetry of an aqueous solution containing sodium 3-(125I)iodo-4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate (iotrex) for brachytherapy of resected malignant brain tumors. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 15(6):645–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dempsey JF, Williams JA, Stubbs JB, Patrick TJ, Williamson JF (1998) Dosimetric properties of a novel brachytherapy balloon applicator for the treatment of malignant brain-tumor resection-cavity margins. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42(2):421–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tatter SB, Shaw EG, Rosenblum ML et al (2003) An inflatable balloon catheter and liquid 125I radiation source (GliaSite radiation therapy system) for treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: multicenter safety and feasibility trial. J Neurosurg 99(2):297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallner KE, Galicich JH, Krol G, Arbit E, Malkin MG (1989) Patterns of failure following treatment for glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 16(6):1405–1409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan JL, Lee SW, Fraass BA et al (2002) Survival and failure patterns of high-grade gliomas after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 20(6):1635–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SW, Fraass BA, Marsh LH et al (1999) Patterns of failure following high-dose 3-D conformal radiotherapy for high-grade astrocytomas: a quantitative dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43(1):79–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chamberlain MC (2011) Radiographic patterns of relapse in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 101(2):319–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel TR, McHugh BJ, Bi WL, Minja FJ, Knisely JP, Chiang VL (2011) A comprehensive review of MR imaging changes following radiosurgery to 500 brain metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(10):1885–1892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleinberg L, Yoon G, Weingart JD, et al. Imaging after GliaSite brachytherapy: prognostic MRI indicators of disease control and recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009.

  11. Fink J, Born D, Chamberlain MC (2011) Pseudoprogression: Relevance with respect to treatment of high-grade gliomas. Curr Treat Options Oncol 12(3):240–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Souhami L, Seiferheld W, Brachman D et al (2004) Randomized comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery followed by conventional radiotherapy with carmustine to conventional radiotherapy with carmustine for patients with glioblastoma multiforme: report of radiation therapy oncology group 93–05 protocol. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(3):853–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laperriere NJ, Leung PM, McKenzie S et al (1998) Randomized study of brachytherapy in the initial management of patients with malignant astrocytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41(5):1005–1011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cardinale R, Won M, Choucair A et al (2006) A phase II trial of accelerated radiotherapy using weekly stereotactic conformal boost for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: RTOG 0023. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(5):1422–1428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schupak K, Malkin M, Anderson L, Arbit E, Lindsley K, Leibel S (1995) The relationship between the technical accuracy of stereotactic interstitial implantation for high grade gliomas and the pattern of tumor recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(4):1167–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleinberg L, Yoon G, Weingart JD et al (2009) Imaging after GliaSite brachytherapy: prognostic MRI indicators of disease control and recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(5):1385–1391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan TA, Weingart JD, Parisi M et al (2005) Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme with GliaSite brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62(4):1133–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gabayan AJ, Green SB, Sanan A et al (2006) GliaSite brachytherapy for treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas: a retrospective multi-institutional analysis. Neurosurgery 58(4):701–9, discussion 701–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gobitti C, Borsatti E, Arcicasa M et al (2011) Treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas with GliaSite brachytherapy: a prospective mono-institutional italian experience. Tumori 97(5):614–619

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Westphal M, Ram Z, Riddle V, Hilt D, Bortey E, Executive Committee of the Gliadel Study Group (2006) Gliadel wafer in initial surgery for malignant glioma: long-term follow-up of a multicenter controlled trial. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148(3):269–75, discussion 275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Westphal M, Hilt DC, Bortey E et al (2003) A phase 3 trial of local chemotherapy with biodegradable carmustine (BCNU) wafers (gliadel wafers) in patients with primary malignant glioma. Neuro Oncol 5(2):79–88

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brem H, Piantadosi S, Burger PC et al (1995) Placebo-controlled trial of safety and efficacy of intraoperative controlled delivery by biodegradable polymers of chemotherapy for recurrent gliomas. The polymer-brain tumor treatment group. Lancet 345(8956):1008–1012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Matheus MG, Castillo M, Ewend M et al (2004) CT and MR imaging after placement of the GliaSite radiation therapy system to treat brain tumor: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25(7):1211–1217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Spagnolli F et al (2008) Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro Oncol 10(3):361–367

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ (2008) Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 9(5):453–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Walker AJ, Ruzevick J, Malayeri AA et al (2014) Postradiation imaging changes in the CNS: how can we differentiate between treatment effect and disease progression? Future Oncol 10(7):1277–1297

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brem H, Mahaley MS Jr, Vick NA et al (1991) Interstitial chemotherapy with drug polymer implants for the treatment of recurrent gliomas. J Neurosurg 74(3):441–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brem H, Ewend MG, Piantadosi S, Greenhoot J, Burger PC, Sisti M (1995) The safety of interstitial chemotherapy with BCNU-loaded polymer followed by radiation therapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed malignant gliomas: phase I trial. J Neurooncol 26(2):111–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Olivi A, Grossman SA, Tatter S et al (2003) Dose escalation of carmustine in surgically implanted polymers in patients with recurrent malignant glioma: a new approaches to brain tumor therapy CNS consortium trial. J Clin Oncol 21(9):1845–1849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kleinberg LR, Weingart J, Burger P et al (2004) Clinical course and pathologic findings after Gliadel and radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma: implications for patient management. Cancer Invest 22(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Welsh J, Sanan A, Gabayan AJ et al (2007) GliaSite brachytherapy boost as part of initial treatment of glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multi-institutional pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(1):159–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute Grants CA62-475 and CA137443 and by Proxima Therapeutics, Alpharetta, GA.

Ethical standards statement

All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. R. Kleinberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kleinberg, L.R., Stieber, V., Mikkelsen, T. et al. Outcome of Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC) prospective dose-finding trials of I-125 balloon brachytherapy in high-grade gliomas: challenges in clinical trial design and technology development when MRI treatment effect and recurrence appear similar. J Radiat Oncol 4, 235–241 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0210-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0210-y

Keywords

Navigation