Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic Multistate Models With Constant Cross-Product Ratios: Applications to Poverty Status

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Cross-product ratios (αs), which are structurally analogous to odds ratios, are statistically sound and demographically meaningful measures. Assuming constant cross-product ratios in the elements of a matrix of multistate transition probabilities provides a new basis both for calculating probabilities from minimal data and for modeling populations with changing demographic rates. Constant-α estimation parallels log linear modeling, in which the αs are the fixed interactions, and the main effects are calculated from relevant data. Procedures are presented showing how an N state model’s matrix of transition probabilities can be found from the constant αs and (1) the state composition of adjacent populations, (2) (N – 1) known probabilities, (3) (N – 1) known transfer rates, or (4) (2N – 1) known numbers of transfers. The scope and flexibility of constant-α models makes them applicable to a broad range of demographic subjects, including marital/union status, political affiliation, residential status, and labor force status. Here, an application is provided to the important but understudied topic of poverty status. Census data, separately for men and women, provide age-specific numbers of persons in three poverty statuses for the years 2009 and 2014. Using an estimated transition matrix that furnishes a set of cross-product ratios, the constant-α approach allows the calculation of male and female poverty status life tables for the 2009–2014 period. The results describe the time spent in each poverty state and the transitions between states over the entire life course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Arias, E., Heron, M., & Xu, J. Q. (2016). United States life tables, 2012 (National Vital Statistics Reports Vol. 65, No. 8). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

  • Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. T. (1986). Slipping into and out of poverty: The dynamics of spells. Journal of Human Resources, 21, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., & Mackie, S. (1972). The calibration of gravity, entropy, and related models of spatial interaction. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 4, 205–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. F., Rehkopf, D., Tuljapurkar, S., & Horvitz, C. C. (2018). Poverty dynamics, poverty thresholds and mortality: An age-stage Markovian model. PLoS One, 13, e0195734. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195734

  • Bishop, Y. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Cellini, S. R., McKernan, S.-M., & Ratcliffe, C. (2008). The dynamics of poverty in the United States: A review of data, methods, and findings. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 577–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, R., & Poet, R. (1973). An entropy maximizing approach to the recovery of detailed migration patterns from aggregate census data. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 5, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2015). Measuring single-year poverty transitions: Opportunities and limitations (SEHSD Working Paper No. FY2015-19). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Social Economic and Housing Statistics Division.

  • Feeney, G. M. (1970). Stable by region age distributions. Demography, 7, 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Ramos, J., Garcia-Guerra, A. K., Garza-Rodriguez, J., & Morales-Ramirez, G. (2016). The dynamics of poverty transitions in Mexico. International Journal of Social Economics, 43, 1082–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusaro, V. A., Levy, H. G., & Shaefer, H. L. (2018). Racial and ethnic disparities in the lifetime prevalence of homelessness in the United States. Demography, 55, 2119–2128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1994). On quasi-independence and quasi-dependence in contingency tables, with special reference to ordinal triangular contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 1059–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1979). Measures of association for cross-classifications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

  • Halli, S. S., & Rao, K. V. (1992). Advanced techniques of population analysis. New York, NY: Plenum.

  • Hokayem, C., & Heggeness, M. L. (2014a). Living in near poverty in the United States: 1966–2012 (Current Population Reports No. P60-248). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Hokayem, C., & Heggeness, M. L. (2014b). Factors influencing transitions into and out of near poverty: 2004–2012 (SEHSD Working Paper No. 2014-05). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Social Economic and Housing Statistics Division.

  • Iceland, J. (1997). Urban labor markets and individual transitions out of poverty. Demography, 34, 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruithof, J. (1937). Calculation of telephone traffic (UK Post Office Research Department Library No. 2663, Trans.). De Ingenieur, 52, E15–E25.

  • Lee, N., Ridder, G., & Strauss, J. (2017). Estimation of poverty transition matrices with noisy data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. W. (2005). Quasi-independence. In P. Armitage & T. Colton (Eds.), Encyclopedia of biostatistics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a10051

  • McFarland, D. D. (1972). Comparison of alternative marriage models. In T. N. E. Greville (Ed.), Population dynamics (pp. 89–106). New York, NY: Academic Press.

  • Montez, J. K., Zajacova, A., Hayward, M. D., Woolf, S. H., Chapman, D., & Beckfield, J. (2019). Educational disparities in adult mortality across U.S. states: How do they differ, and have they changed since the mid-1980s? Demography, 56, 621–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, P. S. (1985). Estimation of period-specific gross migration flows from limited data: Bi-proportional adjustment approach. Demography, 22, 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipov, D. (1978). Migration and settlement in Bulgaria. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 10, 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. H., & Taubman, P. (1994). Socioeconomic differences in adult mortality and health status. In L. G. Martin & S. H. Preston (Eds.), Demography of aging (pp. 279–318). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2015). The likelihood of experiencing relative poverty over the life course. PLoS One, 10, e0133513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133513

  • Rogers, A., Raymer, J., & Willekens, F. (2003). Imposing age and spatial structures on inadequate migration-flow datasets. Professional Geographer, 55, 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R. (1975). Constructing increment-decrement life tables. Demography, 12, 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R. (2006). Dynamic population models. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

  • Schoen, R., & Jonsson, S. H. (2003). Estimating multistate transition rates from population distributions. Demographic Research, 9, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2003.9.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R., & Kim, Y. J. (1994, May). Hyperstability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Miami, FL.

  • Stevens, A. H. (2011). Poverty transitions. In P. N. Jefferson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the economics of poverty (pp. 494–518). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Sweeney, S. H. (1999). Model-based incomplete data analysis with an application to occupational mobility and migration accounts. Mathematical Population Studies, 3, 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Table POV34. Single year of age—Poverty status. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Table POV34. Single year of age—Poverty status. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Willekens, F. (1982). Multidimensional population analysis with incomplete data. In K. C. Land & A. Rogers (Eds.), Multidimensional mathematical demography (pp. 43–111). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many helpful comments from Lowell Hargens are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Schoen.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 106 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 267 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schoen, R. Dynamic Multistate Models With Constant Cross-Product Ratios: Applications to Poverty Status. Demography 57, 779–797 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00865-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00865-9

Keywords

Navigation