Abstract
This study used implicit leadership theory (ILT) as a lens for understanding corruption from the perspective of followers and in developing a model that describes the relationship among followers’ schema congruence with corrupt leadership, corruption tolerance, and subsequent work outcomes. Factors that describe characteristics of corrupt leadership were identified through interviews with eight employees and middle managers from different government and business sectors. A survey questionnaire was developed from the qualitative data and administered to 114 Filipino employees. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to confirm the hypothesized relationships among the variables. Qualitative results suggest that followers characterize corrupt leadership as selfish, unethical, and discreetly manipulative, but tolerate this for various reasons such as the fear of retaliation and personally benefiting from corruption. Quantitative findings indicate that followers’ corruption tolerance mediates the relationship between experiences of corrupt leadership and workplace outcomes. Followers who perceive greater corruption in their leaders and are more tolerant of corruption have negative attitudes toward their jobs and teams. The study highlights the need for organizations to monitor corruption among their leadership, establish feedback processes, and implement organizational mechanisms to address corrupt practices and attitudes. Leadership training and employee development programs that consider the influence of cultural norms on corruption tolerance and reporting as well as clearly describe ethical behavior may aid in reducing corruption tolerance and enhancing integrity in the workplace.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The information supporting this research is accessible upon reasonable request from the authors. It is not publicly accessible because it contains data that may jeopardize the privacy of the research participants.
References
Al Halbusi, H., Tang, T. L., Williams, K. A., & Ramayah, T. (2022). Do ethical leaders enhance employee ethical behaviors? Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 11(1), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-022-00143-4
Alampay, L. P. (2014). Parenting in the Philippines. In H. Selin (Ed.), Parenting across cultures. Science across cultures: The History of Non-Western Science. (Vol. 7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7503-9_9
Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(2), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.13837437
Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25001-2
Bashir, M., & Hassan, S. (2020). The need for ethical leadership in combating corruption. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(4), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318825386
Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., Pearce, C. L., Justin, J. E., & Stovall, J. F. (2007). When the romance is over: Follower perspectives of aversive leadership. Applied Psychology, 56(4), 528–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00303.x
Bowling, N., & Hammond, G. (2008). A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.004
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third Edition (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. (1983). Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71–138). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Campbell, J. L., & Göritz, A. S. (2013). Culture corrupts! A qualitative study of organizational culture in corrupt organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1665-7
Cicek, I., & Biçer, İ. (2015). Mediating role of value congruence on the relationship between relational demography and satisfaction from team leader: A research in technology-based organization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.863
Ciziceno, M., & Travaglino, G. A. (2019). Perceived corruption and individuals’ life satisfaction: The mediating role of institutional trust. Social Indicators Research, 141(2), 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1850-2
Crossman, B., & Crossman, J. (2011). Conceptualising followership–A review of the literature. Leadership, 7(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715011416891
Dattalo, P. (2013). Analysis of Multiple Dependent Variables. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773596.001.0001
De Guzman, I. L., & Teng-Calleja, M. (2018). Development of a model for a great place to work and its perceived outcomes: An example from the Philippines. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 31(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21252
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627–647. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29765008.
Edmonds, W., & Kennedy, T. (2017). Exploratory-sequential approach. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802779
Eisenbeiß, S. A., & Brodbeck, F. (2014). Ethical and unethical leadership: A cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1740-0
Entwistle, T., & Doering, H. (2023). Amoral management and the normalisation of deviance: The case of Stafford hospital. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05445-6
Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659
Foti, R. J., Hansbrough, T. K., Epitropaki, O., & Coyle, P. T. (2017). Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories: Approaches, findings, and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.004
Furuse, Y. (2021). Risk at mass-gathering events and the usefulness of complementary events during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Infection, 82(3), e20–e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.11.040
Gaillard, M., & DeCorte, M. J. (2020). Ethics and workplace productivity. The Journal of Government Financial Management, 68(4), 50–52. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ethics-workplace-productivity/docview/2376136611/se-2.
Ganter, A. (2021). Followership: A study of workplace interactions [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved September 14, 2022, from https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/404518
Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.2307/259263
Glazer, S., Roach, K. N., Carmona, C., & Simonovich, H. (2018). Acculturation and adjustment as a function of perceived and objective value congruence. International Journal of Psychology, 53(S2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12554
Gong, T., & Wang, S. (2012). Indicators and implications of zero tolerance of corruption: The case of Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0071-3
Gonzales, C. (2021). A broken vow: An examination of the cases of corruption in the Philippines. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v2i1.36
Gruys, M., & Sackett, P. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00224
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Halter, M. V., de Arruda, M. C. C., & Halter, R. B. (2009). Transparency to reduce corruption? Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0198-6
Harris, D. (2020). Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Transportation Systems, Medical Ergonomics and Training (Vol. 3). Routledge.
Hechanova, Ma. R. M., & Manaois, J. O. (2020). Blowing the whistle on workplace corruption: The role of ethical leadership. International Journal of Law and Management, 62(3), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-02-2019-0038
Hechanova, M. R. M., Melgar, I., Falguera, P. Z., & Villaverde, M. (2014). Organisational culture and workplace corruption in government hospitals. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 8(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2014.5
Heyneman, S. P., Anderson, K. H., & Nuraliyeva, N. (2008). The cost of corruption in higher education. Comparative Education Review, 52(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/524367
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
Hossain, N., & Pande, S. (2022). Grievance redress mechanisms in the public sector: A literature review. In The skeptic’s guide to open government (pp. 3–15). Accountability Research Center. Retrieved September 13, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360682866_Grievance_Redress_Mechanisms_in_the_Public_Sector_A_Literature_Review
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Ito, A., Harrison, J., Bligh, M., & Roland-Lévy, C. (2020). A follower-centric perspective on charismatic leadership. Routledge International Handbook of Charisma, 324–336. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429263224-34
Jun, I.-W., Kim, K.-I., & Rowley, C. (2018). Organizational culture and the tolerance of corruption: The case of South Korea. Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(4), 534–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1589728
Katou, A. A. (2013). The relationship between corrupt practices and organisational performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 8(4), 323. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbge.2013.059162
Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2019). The power of empowering leadership: Allowing and encouraging followers to take charge of their own jobs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(9), 1865–1898. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1657166
Klitgaard, R. (2017). On culture and corruption. Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford. Retrieved September 13, 2023, from. https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-05/BSG-WP-2017-020.pdf
Lord, R. G., Epitropaki, O., Foti, R. J., & Hansbrough, T. K. (2020). Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045434
Lorenzana, A. E. (2015). A semantic analysis of “pakikisama”, a key Filipino cultural relationship concept: The NSM approach. Iamure International Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Religion 7(1). https://doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ijlpr.v7i1.874
Luo, Y. (2005). An organizational perspective of corruption. Management and Organization Review, 1(01), 119–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2004.00006.x
Magsaysay, J. F., & Hechanova, M. R. (2017). Building an implicit change leadership theory. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(6), 834–848. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-05-2016-0114
Meindl, J. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90012-8
Meindl, J. R. (1993). Reinventing leadership: A radical, social psychological approach. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations (pp. 89–118). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
Naseer, S., Raja, U., Syed, F., Donia, M., & Darr, W. (2016). Perils of being close to a bad leader in a bad environment: Exploring the combined effects of despotic leadership, leader member exchange, and perceived organizational politics on behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.005
Nawawi, A., & Salin, A. S. (2019). To whistle or not to whistle? Determinants and consequences. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-10-2017-0090
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Parboteeah, K. P., Chen, H. C., Lin, Y., Chen, I., Lee, A. Y., & Chung, A. (2010). Establishing organizational ethical climates: How do managerial practices work? Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0527-9
Podobnik, B., Shao, J., Njavro, D., Ivanov, P., & Stanley, H. (2008). Influence of corruption on economic growth rate and foreign investment. The European Physical Journal B, 63(4), 547–550. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2008-00210-2
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., & Podsakoff, S. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Rabie, M. O., & Malek, M. A. (2020). Ethical leadership and employee ethical behavior: A moderated mediation mechanisms. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 3(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v3i2.321
Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations–Development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9898-6
Reyes, J. (2015). Loob and Kapwa: Thomas Aquinas and a Filipino virtue ethics [Doctoral dissertation]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/34640273.pdf
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press.
Saithibvongsa, P., & JinKyo, S. (2019). Individual perceived corruption diminishes the work effectiveness and organizational performance: Public organizations in Laos. International Journal of Economics and Management, 1(1), 26–46. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3331874.
Salvosa, H. C., & Hechanova, M. R. M. (2020). Generational differences and implicit leadership schemas in the Philippine workforce. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-08-2018-0314
Schyns, B., & Meindl, J. R. (Eds.). (2005). Implicit leadership theories: Essays and explorations. Information Age Publishing.
Segal, L. (2002). Roadblocks in reforming corrupt agencies: The case of the New York City school custodians. Public Administration Review, 62, 445–460.
Tang, Y., Zhan, X., & Chen, K. (2018). Differential leadership and organizational corruption in China: Mediating role of moral disengagement and moderating role of organizational justice. Chinese Management Studies, 12(4), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-12-2017-0344
Tanguma, J. (2001). Effects of sample size on the distribution of selected fit indices: A graphical approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(5), 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971509
Tanner, C., Linder, S., & Sohn, M. (2022). Does moral commitment predict resistance to corruption? Experimental evidence from a bribery game. PLoS ONE, 17(1), e0262201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262201
Tavares, G. M., Sobral, F., Goldszmidt, R., & Araújo, F. (2018). Opening the implicit leadership theories’ black box: An experimental approach with conjoint analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00100
Transparency International. (2022). Corruption perception index. Retrieved April 15, 2023, from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021
Tu, W., Yang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Influence of individual values on attitudes toward corruption: What undermine formal anticorruption effectiveness. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12402
Ugaddan, R. G., & Park, S. M. (2018). Do trustful leadership, organizational justice, and motivation influence whistle-blowing intention? Evidence from federal employees. Public Personnel Management, 48(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018783009
Ullah, I., Mirza, B., & Hameed, R. M. (2022). Understanding the dynamic nexus between ethical leadership and employees’ innovative performance: The intermediating mechanism of social capital. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 11(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-022-00141-6
Valentine, S., Hollingworth, D., & Eidsness, B. (2014). Ethics-related selection and reduced ethical conflict as drivers of positive work attitudes. Personnel Review, 43(5), 692–716. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-12-2012-0207
Van Quaquabeke, N., van Knippenberg, D., & Brodbeck, F. (2011). More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates’ self-perceptions in leader categorization processes. Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.011
Wolor, C. W., Ardiansyah, A., Rofaida, R., Nurkhin, A., & Rababah, M. A. (2022). Impact of toxic leadership on employee performance. Health Psychology Research, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.57551
Zakaria, P. (2018). To tolerate or not tolerate bribery: Can a lack of control over corruption determine tolerance levels? 2018 OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum. Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/corruption/integrity-forum/academic-papers/Zakaria.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aumentado, D.C., Balagtas, L.J., Cu, T.G. et al. Follow the leader?: the relationships among corrupt leadership, followers’ corruption tolerance, and workplace outcomes. Asian J Bus Ethics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-023-00189-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-023-00189-y