Skip to main content
Log in

Moral economic axioms, preference formation and welfare in Islamic economics and business

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumers and producers aim to maximize their welfare through economic transactions. Their welfare is determined by choices and preferences. Therefore, understanding social and economic welfare projected by conventional and Islamic economics requires exploring their underlying paradigms and axioms for preference formation, choices, and welfare maximization. Even though conventional economics assumes that preferences are given, it actually considers that they are driven by self-interest. It does not discuss preference formation along determining moral axioms. Rather, it starts from revealed preferences to understand choices of consumers and producers. Thus, preference formation is like a black box. This paper is an attempt to unlock this black box by exploring preference formation along its underlying moral axioms for good life. The paper discusses Islamic moral ideals within the Islamic worldview along the implications of those axioms for consumers, employees, and employers. The paper also explores the gap between those ideals and Muslim reality. It suggests how to empirically test the relationship between moral axioms and ethical behaviors of consumers, employers, and employees. It concludes that internalizing moral axioms would serve as an ethical compass necessary to establish formal and informal institutions for efficient and ethical business organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, K. (1992). Nature and significance of Islamic economics. In A. Ausaf & K. R. Awan (Eds.), Lectures on Islamic economics. Jeddah: IRTI, IDB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Attas, M. (1995). Prolegomena to the metaphysics of Islam. Malaysia: ISTAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, M. (2005). The ethical economy and competitive markets: reconciling altruistic, moralistic, and ethical behavior with the rational economic agent and competitive markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 732–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: the hidden forces that shape our decisions (1st ed.). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2002). Nicomachean ethics. Translation, introduction, and commentary by Sarah Broadie and Christopher Rowe. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, M. (2003). The message of the Qur’an: the full account of the revealed Arabic text accompanied by parallel transliteration. The Book Foundation.

  • Asutay, M. (2007). A political economy approach to Islamic economics: systemic understanding for an alternative economic system. Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, 1(2), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asutay, M. (2012). Conceptualising and locating the social failure of Islamic finance: aspirations of Islamic moral economy vs. the realities of Islamic finance. Asian and African Area Studies, 11(2), 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, N. (2010). Sustainable consumption and subjective well-being. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 6(5), 133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, N. (2012). A grand theory of human nature and happiness. Humanomics. International Journal of Systems and Ethics, 28(1).

  • Aydin, N. (2013). Redefining Islamic economics as a new economic paradigm. IRTI Journal of Islamic Economic Studies, 21(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, N. (2014). Paradigmatic and conceptual framework for Islamic HDI. Maqasid Al-Shariah Based Index of Socio-Economic Development Seminar/Workshop, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

  • Aydin, N. (2015). Free market madness and human nature. Humanomics, 31(1), 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, N. (2016). Moral economic axioms, preference, choice, and welfare in conventional and Islamic economics. Conference paper presented at the SASE Mini Conference on Islam and the construction of new economic moralities: divergence, convergence and competing futures at the University of California-Berkeley on 24–26 June 2016.

  • Aydin, N. (2017). Institutional values needed for transformative socio-economic development in the Muslim world, Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, forthcoming.

  • Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Harvard University Press.

  • Becker, G. S. (2013). The economic approach to human behavior. University of Chicago Press.

  • Bentham, J. (2007). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation [electronic resource]. Dover.

  • Chapra, U. (2008a). Islamic economics: what it is and how it developed. EH.Net Encyclopedia.

  • Chapra, U. (2008b). The Islamic vision of development in the light of the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. Jeddah: Islamic Development Bank.

  • Choudhury, A. (2007). The universal paradigm and the Islamic world-system. World Scientific Publishing Co.

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (2002). A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 1139–1144. doi:10.1093/ije/31.6.1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colander, D. (2005). Integrating ethics and altruism with economics, or altruism, economics, and hume’s dictum—a response to Morris Altman. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 758–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cools, K. (2005). Ebbers rex. Wall Street Journal, A22.

  • Croson, R., & Konow, J. (2009). Social preferences and moral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(3), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, G. (2003). The progress paradox: how life gets better while people feel worse (1st ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (2010). Moral dimension: toward a new economics. Simon and Schuster.

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). The economics of happiness. World Economics, 3(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics.

  • Ghazali, I. (2001). Kimiyay-i saadat (alchemy of happiness) (M. A. Bilal Trans.). Lahore, Pakistan: Kazi.

  • Grassl, W., & Habisch, A. (2011). Ethics and economics: towards a new humanistic synthesis for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. M. (1992). The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (1993). Taking ethics seriously: economics and contemporary moral philosophy. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(2), 671–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2006). Economic analysis, moral philosophy and public policy. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2009). Preference satisfaction and welfare economics. Economics and Philosophy, 25(01), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (2014). The evolution of morality and the end of economic man. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(1), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islamicity (2017). Islamicity indices. http://islamicity-index.org/wp/islamicity-rankings/. Accessed 5 March 2017.

  • Johanson, P. (1992). Altruism in cost-benefit analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2(6), 605–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York; Cambridge, UK: Russell Sage Foundation; Cambridge University Press.

  • Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leightner, J. E. (2005). Utility maximization, morality, and religion. Journal of Economic Issues, 39(2), 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2013). After virtue. A&C Black.

  • Marx, K., & Lederer, H. (1958). On the Jewish question. Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. (1993). Is sympathy an economic value? Contingent caluation: a critical Assessment, 417–442.

  • Mill, J. S., & Crisp, R. (1998). Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, S. N. H. (1994). Islam, economics, and society/syed nawab haider naqvi. London: Kegan Paul International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (2007). Thus spoke Zarathustra (Barnes & Noble classics series). C. Martin Trans. Barnes & Noble.

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. doi.10.2307/2234910

  • Nursi, S. (1996a). The flashes (S. Vahide Trans.). Sozler.

  • Nursi, S. (1996b). The letters (S. Vahide Trans.). Sozler.

  • Nursi, S. (1996c). The words (S. Vahide Trans.). Sozler.

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. Harvard University Press.

  • Putnam, H., & Walsh, V. (2012). The end of value-free economics. Routledge.

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1948). Foundations of economic analysis.

  • Smith, A. (1976). In D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie (Ed.), The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford Eng.: Clarendon.

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. USA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Staveren, I. (2007). Beyond utilitarianism and deontology: ethics in economics. Review of Political Economy, 19(1), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veisten, K. (2007). Contingent valuation controversies: philosophic debates about economic theory. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(2), 204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Necati Aydin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydin, N. Moral economic axioms, preference formation and welfare in Islamic economics and business. Asian J Bus Ethics 7, 21–36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-017-0077-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-017-0077-7

Keywords

Navigation