Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the impact of empathy, compassion, and Machiavellianism on consumer ethics in an emerging market

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of positive personality traits (i.e., empathy and compassion) and negative personality traits (i.e., Machiavellianism) on consumer ethics in Indonesia. This is one of the first studies to explore this topic in relation to Indonesia, which is the fourth most populous country in the world. The paper-based survey was distributed to a large private university in Indonesia. Based on this convenience sample of 540 respondents, the results showed that cognitive empathy and compassion negatively impacted consumers’ perception toward various unethical behaviors, while desire for control and distrust of others positively influenced such behaviors. Based on earlier studies showing that the younger generation has less empathy than previous generations, the findings of the present study have important implications for creating a more empathetic and compassionate society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albiero, P., Matricardi, G., Speltri, D., & Toso, D. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: a contribution to the Italian validation of the “Basic Empathy Scale”. Journal of Adolescence, 32(2), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khatib, J. A., Vitell, S. J., & Rawwas, M. Y. (1997). Consumer ethics: a cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Marketing, 31(11/12), 750–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. & Konrath, S. (2011). Why should we care?—what to do about declining student empathy. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Should-We-Care-What/128420/.

  • Arli, D., & Tjiptono, F. (2014). The end of religion? Examining the role of religiousness, materialism, and long-term orientation on consumer ethics in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–16.

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. A., & Thompson, S. (1985). The role of perspective taking and empathy in children’s Machiavellianism, prosocial behavior, and motive for helping. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146(3), 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. A., Feighny, K. M., & Esper, J. A. (1983). Effects of anticipated victim responsiveness and empathy upon volunteering. The Journal of Social Psychology, 119(2), 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Harris, A. C., McCaul, K. D., Davis, M., & Schmidt, T. (1979). Compassion or compliance: alternative dispositional attributions for one’s helping behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 405–409.

  • Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Adults' emotional reactions to the distress of others. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 163–185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block-Lerner, J., Adair, C., Plumb, J. C., Rhatigan, D. L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2007). The case for mindfulness-based approaches in the cultivation of empathy: does nonjudgmental, present-moment awareness increase capacity for perspective-taking and empathic concern? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 501–516. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00034.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S. S., Powell, L. K., & Coke, J. S. (1984). The effects of empathic instructions upon donating behavior: Sex differences in young children. Sex Roles, 10(5), 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, D. M. (2001). Empathy in sexually offending and nonoffending adolescent males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(3), 222–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, C. A., Mullis, R. L., & Mullis, A. K. (2000). Differences in empathy between offender and nonoffender youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(4), 467–478.

  • Business Software Alliance. (2011). Well over half the world’s computer users admit pirating software, BSA study finds. Retrieved from http://www.bsa.org/country/News%20and%20Events/News%20Archives/global/05152012-idc-globalpiracystudy.aspx?sc_lang=en

  • Christie, R., Geis, F. L., & Berger, D. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism (p. 106). New York: Academic Press.

  • CIA World FAcbook (2013). Indonesia. Retrieved from: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/id.html

  • Coke, J. J. (1980). Empathic mediation of helping: Egoistic or altruistic? (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning).

  • Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. M. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1143–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., & Penner, L. A. (2001). Helping and altruism. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes, 162–195.

  • Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Karbon, M., Maszk, P., Smith, M., et al. (1994). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(4), 776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, R. Z. (2015). The effects of Machiavellianism and cultural dimensions on business students’ general distrust of corporations. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erffmeyer, R. C., Keillor, B. D., & LeClair, D. T. (1999). An empirical investigation of Japanese consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, J. (2016). Americans’ sad lack of empathy. Source: http://www.lifezette.com/healthzette/americans-sad-lack-empathy/

  • Farrington, D. P., & Jolliffe, D. (2005). Crime and Justice in England and Wales, 1981-1999. Crime and Justice, 33, 41–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of marketing ,49(3).

  • Feshbach, N. D. (1975). Empathy in children: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 5(2), 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fultz, J., Batson, C. D., Fortenbach, V. A., McCarthy, P. M., & Varney, L. L. (1986). Social evaluation and the empathy–altruism hypothesis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 50(4), 761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: a group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. W., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2004). An introduction to the dark side. The dark side of organizational behavior, 1-19. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Factor structure of the psychopathy checklist. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: a case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, (1982), 279–309.

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

  • Hwang, J. Y., Plante, T., & Lackey, K. (2008). The development of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale: An abbreviation of Sprecher and Fehr’s Compassionate Love Scale. Pastoral Psychology, 56(4), 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IOR (2016). Indonesia. Source: http://www.iorworld.com/indonesia-pages-490.php

  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(5), 441–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, J. M., Stevens, R. E., & Bethke, A. L. (1987). Differences in ethical perceptions between male and female managers: myth or reality? Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 489–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBler, D. (2011). America’s continuing empathy deficit. Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/douglas-labier/americas-continuing-empat_b_637718.html.

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation (p. 557). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiberg, S., Klimecki, O., & Singer, T. (2011). Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game. PloS One, 6(3), e17798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, R. F., & Gray Jr., L. (1997). Close relationships of violent and nonviolent African American delinquents. Violence and Victims, 13(1), 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1997). Relations among personality scales of aggression, violence, and empathy: validational evidence bearing on the risk of Eruptive Violence Scale. Aggressive Behavior, 23(6), 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muncy, J. A., & Eastman, J. K. (1998). Materialism and consumer ethics: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muncy, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: an investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24(4), 297–311.

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekerti, A. and Arli, D. (2016). Do cultural and generational cohorts matter to ideologies and consumer ethics? A Comparative Study of Australians, Indonesians, and Indonesian Migrants in Australia. DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2777-z.

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (Vol. 1). NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(11), 4086–4091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilch, I., & Turska, E. (2015). Relationships between Machiavellianism, organizational culture, and workplace bullying: emotional abuse from the target’s and the perpetrator’s perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rallapalli, K. C., Vitell, S. J., Wiebe, F. A., & Barnes, J. H. (1994). Consumer ethical beliefs and personality traits: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(7), 487–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1996). Consumer ethics: an empirical investigation of the ethical beliefs of Austrian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(9), 1009–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Singhapakdi, A. (1998, Spring). Do consumers’ ethical beliefs vary with age: a substantiation of Kohlberg’s typology in marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Strutton, D., & Johnson, L. W. (1996). An exploratory investigation of the ethical values of American and Australian consumers. Journal of Direct Marketing, 10, 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Patzer, G., & Vitell, S. J. (1998). A cross cultural investigation of the ethical values of consumers: the potential effect of war and civil disruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayburn, J. M., & Rayburn, L. G. (1996). Relationship between Machiavellianism and type A personality and ethical-orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1209–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. R., & Ross, R. (Eds.). (1995). Thinking straight: the reasoning and rehabilitation program for delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Air Training and Publications.

  • Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Bañón-Gomis, A. (2016). The negative impact of chameleon-inducing personalities on employees’ ethical work intentions: the mediating role of Machiavellianism. European Management Journal.

  • Sendjaya, S., Pekerti, A., Härtel, C., Hirst, G., & Butarbutar, I. (2016). Are authentic leaders always moral? The role of Machiavellianism in the relationship between authentic leadership and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serin, R. C., & Kuriychuk, M. (1994). Social and cognitive processing deficits in violent offenders: implications for treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 17(4), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Fehr, B. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 629–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista (2016). Number of actual and attempted piracy attacks in Indonesia from 2008 to 2016*. Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/250866/number-of-actual-and-attempted-piracy-attacks-in-indonesia/.

  • Staub, E. (1987). Commentary on part 1. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 103–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strutton, D., Vitell, S. J., & Pelton, L. E. (1994). How consumers may justify inappropriate behavior in market settings: An application on the techniques of neutralization. Journal of Business Research, 30(3), 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toi, M., & Batson, C. D. (1982). More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 43(2), 281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparancy International Index (2013). Corruption Perceptions Index 2013. Source: https://www.transparency.org/cpi2013/results. Retrieved: 10 February 2017

  • Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1982). Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upright, R. L. (2002). To tell a tale: the use of moral dilemmas to increase empathy in the elementary school child. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(1), 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kenhove, P., Vermeir, I., & Verniers, S. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationships between ethical beliefs, ethical ideology, political preference and need for closure. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1–2), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy-Vitell Consumer Ethics Scale: a modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Paolillo, G. P. (2003). Consumer ethics: the role of religiousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. (1991). Consumer ethics: an investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Singhapakdi, A., & Thomas, J. (2001). Consumer ethics: an application and empirical testing of the Hunt-Vitell theory of ethics. Journal of Consumer marketing, 18(2), 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wispé, L. (1987). History of the concept of empathy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, S. L. (1981). Effects of Machiavellianism and communication on helping behavior during an emergency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20(3), 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marketing Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia

    Denni Arli

  2. Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

    Dudi Anandya

Authors
  1. Denni Arli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dudi Anandya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denni Arli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arli, D., Anandya, D. Exploring the impact of empathy, compassion, and Machiavellianism on consumer ethics in an emerging market. Asian J Bus Ethics 7, 1–19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-017-0076-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-017-0076-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation