Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Amelioration of murine experimental colitis using biocompatible cyclosporine A lipid carriers

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Drug Delivery and Translational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lipoproteins are biodegradable and biocompatible natural carriers that can be utilized for the transport of hydrophobic drugs, such as cyclosporin A (CycloA), a calcineurin inhibitor utilized for the inflammatory bowel disease, such as ulcerative colitis. A major limitation in the drug treatment of inflammatory bowel disease is the inability to deliver the drug selectively toward the inflamed tissues. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems have led to an amelioration of the therapeutic selectivity, but still the majority of the entrapped drug is eliminated without exercising a therapeutic effect. The present study aimed to prepare three lipoprotein formulations (HDL-, LDL-, and VLDL-based) loaded with cyclosporin A for the treatment of colitis in a murine model. After an intravenous injection of a drug dose of 2 mg/kg, clinical activity (colon weight/length ratio) and therapeutic effects (evaluated by the inflammatory markers MPO and TNF-α) were compared with those of the untreated colitis control group. All CycloA-containing lipoproteins reduced clinical activity, with a significant decrease in the case of LDL-CycloA formulation, which also led to the higher therapeutic effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.

References

  1. Kaplan İ, Yüksel H, Evliyaoğlu O, Basarali MK, Toprak G, Çolpan L, et al. Effects of storage temperature and time on stability of serum tacrolimus and cyclosporine A levels in whole blood by LC-MS/MS. Int J Anal Chem. 2015;2015:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Groen PC. Cyclosporine, low-density lipoprotein, and cholesterol. Mayo Clin Proc. 1988;63:1012–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen CF, Huang LY, Chu IM. Controlled release of cyclosporine A from biodegradable amphiphilic diblock copolymer sol-gel drug delivery system. J Med Biol Eng. 2011;31:177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lichtiger S. The role of cyclosporine therapy in ulcerative colitis treatment. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;9:624–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stacey R, Thomas L. Medical management of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Surg Oxf. 2014;32:418–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chadwick VS, Chen W, Shu D, Paulus B, Bethwaite P, Tie A, et al. Activation of the mucosal immune system in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1778–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loftus CG, Loftus Jr EV & Sandborn WJ. Cyclosporin for refractory ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2003;52:172–173.

  8. Sandborn WJ, Strong RM, Forland SC, Chase RE, Cutler RE. The pharmacokinetics and colonic tissue concentrations of cyclosporine after IV, oral, and enema administration. J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;31:76–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Naeem M, Bae J, A. Oshi M, Kim MS, Moon HR, Lee BL, et al. Colon-targeted delivery of cyclosporine A using dual-functional Eudragit® FS30D/PLGA nanoparticles ameliorates murine experimental colitis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:1225–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harisa GI, Alanazi FK. Low density lipoprotein bionanoparticles: from cholesterol transport to delivery of anti-cancer drugs. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22:504–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng G, Chen J, Li H, Glickson JD. Rerouting lipoprotein nanoparticles to selected alternate receptors for the targeted delivery of cancer diagnostic and therapeutic agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102:17757–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sabnis N, Lacko AG. Drug delivery via lipoprotein-based carriers: answering the challenges in systemic therapeutics. Ther Deliv. 2012;3:599–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung NS, Wasan KM. Potential role of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family as mediators of cellular drug uptake. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:1315–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoppu K, Koskimies O, Holmberg C, Hirvisalo E. Evidence for pre-hepatic metabolism of oral cyclosporine in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;32:477–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bijsterbosch MK, van Berkel TJC. Native and modified lipoproteins as drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1990;5:231–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwong M, Sivak O, Kwong EH, Wasan KM. Cyclosporine A transfer between high- and low-density lipoproteins: independent from lipid transfer protein I-facilitated transfer of lipoprotein-coated phospholipids because of high affinity of cyclosporine a for the protein component of lipoproteins. J Pharm Sci. 2001;90:1308–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mulye N. Microemulsion concentrate composition of cyclosporn. US Patent US 6,638,522 B1, 10;2003.

  18. Ran Y, Zhao L, Xu Q, Yalkowsky SH. Solubilization of cyclosporin A. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2001;2:23–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wasan KM, Brocks DR, Lee SD, Sachs-Barrable K, Thornton SJ. Impact of lipoproteins on the biological activity and disposition of hydrophobic drugs: implications for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:84–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Randhawa PK, Singh K, Singh N, Jaggi AS. A review on chemical-induced inflammatory bowel disease models in rodents. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;18:279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wirtz S, Neufert C, Weigmann B, Neurath MF. Chemically induced mouse models of intestinal inflammation. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:541–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Antoniou E, Margonis GA, Angelou A, Pikouli A, Argiri P, Karavokyros I, et al. The TNBS-induced colitis animal model: an overview. Ann Med Surg. 2016;11:9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdel-Mottaleb MMA, Moulari B, Beduneau A, Pellequer Y, Lamprecht A. Nanoparticles enhance therapeutic outcome in inflamed skin therapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2012;82:151–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Moulari B, Pertuit D, Pellequer Y, Lamprecht A. The targeting of surface modified silica nanoparticles to inflamed tissue in experimental colitis. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4554–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yazeji T, Moulari B, Beduneau A, Stein V, Dietrich D, Pellequer Y, et al. Nanoparticle-based delivery enhances anti-inflammatory effect of low molecular weight heparin in experimental ulcerative colitis. Drug Deliv. 2017;24:811–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Segain J-P. Butyrate inhibits inflammatory responses through NFkappa B inhibition: implications for Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2000;47:397–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown M, Goldstein J. A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1986;232:34–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fong LG, Bonney E, Kosek JC, Cooper AD. Immunohistochemical localization of low density lipoprotein receptors in adrenal gland, liver, and intestine. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:847–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hegele RA. Plasma lipoproteins: genetic influences and clinical implications. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:109–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdel-Mottaleb MMA. Nanoparticles for treatment of atopic dermatitis. In: Nanoscience in Dermatology: Elsevier; 2016. p. 167–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802926-8.00013-6.

  31. Moulari B, Béduneau A, Pellequer Y, Lamprecht A. Lectin-decorated nanoparticles enhance binding to the inflamed tissue in experimental colitis. J Control Release. 2014;188:9–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Abdel-Mottaleb MMA, Lamprecht A. Polymeric nano (and micro) particles as carriers for enhanced skin penetration. In: Dragicevic N, Maibach IH, editors. Percutaneous penetration enhancers chemical methods in penetration enhancement: nanocarriers. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. p. 187–99.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Sobot D, Mura S, Yesylevskyy SO, Dalbin L, Cayre F, Bort G, et al. Conjugation of squalene to gemcitabine as unique approach exploiting endogenous lipoproteins for drug delivery. Nat Commun. 2017;8.

  34. Rensen PCN, de Vrueh RLA, Kuiper J, Bijsterbosch MK, Biessen EAL, van Berkel TJC. Recombinant lipoproteins: lipoprotein-like lipid particles for drug targeting. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;47:251–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Firestone R, Low-Density A. Lipoprotein as a vehicle for targeting antitumor compounds to cancer cells. Bioconjug Chem. 1994;5:105–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ng KK, Lovell JF, Zheng G. Lipoprotein-inspired nanoparticles for cancer theranostics. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:1105–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Canton J, Neculai D, Grinstein S. Scavenger receptors in homeostasis and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:621–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cervadoro A, Palomba R, Vergaro G, Cecchi R, Menichetti L, Decuzzi P, et al. Targeting inflammation with nanosized drug delivery platforms in cardiovascular diseases: immune cell modulation in atherosclerosis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6.

  39. Hu J, Liu H, Wang L. Enhanced delivery of AZT to macrophages via acetylated LDL. J Control Release. 2000;69:327–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Carlson K. Lipoprotein fractionation. J Clin Pathol. 1973;s1–5:32–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Krawisz JE, Sharon P, Stenson WF. Quantitative assay for acute intestinal inflammation based on myeloperoxidase activity. Gastroenterology. 1984;87:1344–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Claire Chrétien for her help during the animal experiments.

Funding

This work is supported by LabEx LipSTIC project, Besancon.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.P. proposed the work and designed the experiments. E.S and MM.A.A were responsible for performing the experiments and writing the results. All authors contributed to the discussion and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mona M. A. Abdel-Mottaleb.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all animal experimental investigations. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Ethical Committee of the University of Franche-Comté (experimentation authorization number A-25-48) and were carried out in accordance with the approved protocol No 2015-003-CD-12PR. The protocol was designed in accordance with the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, USA).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scarcello, E., Abdel-Mottaleb, M.M.A., Beduneau, A. et al. Amelioration of murine experimental colitis using biocompatible cyclosporine A lipid carriers. Drug Deliv. and Transl. Res. 11, 1301–1308 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00835-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00835-z

Keywords

Navigation