Abstract
Iatrogenic bile duct injury remains the most severe complication of gallbladder surgeries. To reduce post-operation complication, we introduce an improved approach for bile duct injury repairment, named transhepatic percutaneous cholangial drainage (TPCD) which combined with end-to-end biliary anastomosis. Clinical data obtained from 12 patients between February 2012 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographic, clinical, operative, and follow-up data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. All injuries were repaired successfully and no fatal cases occurred. The mean operative time and hospital stay duration were 367.5 ± 103.2 min and 11.3 ± 3.5 days, respectively. In two cases (16.7%), bile leakage occurred at the bile duct anastomosis site. Three patients (25.0%) developed low-grade fever and one patient (8.3%) developed a postoperative infection of the incision site. No postoperative bleeding or bile duct strictures occurred in any of the cases. The patients were followed up from 12 to 122 months (median, 70.5 months). No cholangitis or bile duct restenosis was observed after biliary drainage tube removal. There were no long-term bile duct-related complications seen in the follow-up time. It is safe and feasible for TPCD combined with end-to-end biliary anastomosis using in bile duct injury.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Brunt LM, Deziel DJ, Telem DA et al (2020) Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state of the art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 272(1):3–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003791
Khadra H, Johnson H, Crowther J et al (2019) Bile duct injury repairs: progressive outcomes in a tertiary referral center. Surgery 166(4):698–702. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003791
Barrett M, Asbun HJ, Chien HL et al (2018) Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement. Surg Endosc 32(4):1683–1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5847-8
Hogan NM, Dorcaratto D, Hogan AM (2016) Iatrogenic common bile duct injuries: increasing complexity in the laparoscopic era: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 33:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.004
Thompson CM, Saad NE, Quazi RR et al (2013) Management of iatrogenic bile duct injuries: role of the interventional radiologist. Radiographics 33(1):117–134. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.331125044
Guerra F, Coletta D, Gavioli M et al (2020) Minimally invasive surgery for the management of major bile duct injury due to cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 27(4):157–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.710
Cuendis-Velázquez A, Bada-Yllán O, Trejo-Ávila M et al (2018) Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy after bile duct injury. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403(1):53–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1651-8
Prasad A, De S, Mishra P, Tiwari A (2015) Robotic assisted Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in a post-cholecystectomy type E2 bile duct injury. World J Gastroenterol 21(6):1703–1706. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1703
Jabłońska B, Lampe P (2009) Iatrogenic bile duct injuries: etiology, diagnosis and management. World J Gastroenterol 15(33):4097–4104. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4097
Mercado MA, Chan C, Salgado-Nesme N (2008) Intrahepatic repair of bile duct injuries. A comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg 12(2):364–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0428-0
Tsalis KG, Christoforidis EC, Dimitriadis CA et al (2003) Management of bile duct injury during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9230-3
de Reuver PR, Busch OR, Rauws EA et al (2007) Long-term results of a primary end-to-end anastomosis in peroperative detected bile duct injury. J Gastrointest Surg 11(3):296–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0087-1
Kwak BJ, Choi HJ, You YK (2019) Laparoscopic end-to-end biliary reconstruction with T-tube for transected bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 96(6):319–325. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.96.6.319
Jabłonska B (2014) End-to-end ductal anastomosis in biliary reconstruction: indications and limitations. Can J Surg 57(4):271–277. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016613
Lau WY, Lai EC (2007) Classification of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 6(5):459–463
Rystedt JML, Wiss J, Adolfsson J et al (2021) Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy: systematic review, meta-analysis and health economic model analysis of iatrogenic bile duct injury. BJS Open 5(2):zra032. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa032
Törnqvist B, Zheng Z, Ye W et al (2009) Long-term effects of iatrogenic bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(9):1013–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.014
Rystedt JML, Wiss J, Adolfsson J et al (2015) Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 102(8):952–958. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9832
Lou J, Zhao H, Chen W et al (2021) T tube sinus tract duodenal fistula: a rare complication of postoperative choledochoscopy for treating retained intrahepatic stones. Surg Endosc 35(10):5567–5572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08057-7
Koppatz H, Sallinen V, Mäkisalo H et al (2021) Outcomes and quality of life after major bile duct injury in long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 35(6):2879–2888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07726-x
Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y et al (2014) Long-term health-related quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury repair. J Am Coll Surg 219(5):923–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.04.024
Halle-Smith JM, Hodson J, Stevens LG et al (2019) A comprehensive evaluation of the long-term economic impact of major bile duct injury. HPB (Oxford) 21(10):1312–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.018
Gazzaniga GM, Filauro M, Mori L (2001) Surgical treatment of iatrogenic lesions of the proximal common bile duct. World J Surg 25(10):1254–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0105-5
Acknowledgements
We really appreciate the Elsevier Language Editing Service institution for providing language help with our manuscript.
Funding
The research was supported by Health Commission of Zhejiang Province (JBZX-202004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and the design of the study: LL, and JCK. Acquisition of data: YCJ, CXY, CHW, and SWM. Analysis and interpretation of data: LL and YCJ. Draft and critical analysis: LL, YCJ, and CXY.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Reference No. IIT-20211228-0151-01). In addition, written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Human participants and/or animals
Research involving human participants and/or animals. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Yao, C., Chen, X. et al. Optimizing surgical management of iatrogenic bile duct injury: transhepatic percutaneous cholangial drainage combined with end-to-end biliary anastomosis. Updates Surg 75, 1911–1917 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01565-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01565-w