Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Proctological disorders: psychometrics assessment of personality features and clinical evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with gastrointestinal diseases have been shown to report greater stress, anxiety, depression and obsessive–compulsive characteristics. The aim of our study is to investigate personality characteristics and general distress of adult patients suffering from common coloproctological conditions. We conducted a retrospective observational study including patients aged 18 years or older, with diagnosis of haemorrhoidal disease (HD group) or anal fissure (AF group). The final sample was composed of 64 participants, who were asked to complete a battery of questionnaires. They were compared with a control group of healthy volunteers. In terms of general distress, HD group scored higher than both the CG and AF groups. The two proctological groups had higher scores in neuroticism/emotional lability compared to the CG group. In the MOCQ-R scale (obsessive–compulsive tendency), HD group had significantly higher scores compared to the CG group in the total score (p < 0.01,) and also scored higher in the doubting/ruminating subscale compared to the AF group. We support the importance of taking a multidisciplinary perspective and incorporating psychometric tools to assess the psychological and personality dimensions of patients into proctological clinical practice. The correct early evaluation and management of these conditions may result in an improvement in patients’ quality of life and better response to treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Gallo G, Sacco R, Sammarco G (2018) Epidemiology of hemorrhoidal disease. In: Ratto C, Parello A, Litta F (eds) Hemorrhoids coloproctology, vol 2. Springer, Cham, pp 3–7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Mapel DW, Schum M, Von Worley A (2014) The epidemiology and treatment of anal fissures in a population-based cohort. BMC Gastroenterol 16(14):129. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-14-129.PMID:25027411;PMCID:PMC4109752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giuliani A, Romano L, Lazzarin G, Maffione F, Valiyeva S, Schietroma M, Carlei F (2020) Relationship between haemorrhoidal grade and toilet habits. Ann Ital Chir 91:192–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganz RA (2013) The evaluation and treatment of hemorrhoids: a guide for the gastroenterologist. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(6):593–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE (2009) Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases. Gastroenterology 136(2):376–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gardner IH, Siddharthan RV, Tsikitis VL (2020) Benign anorectal disease: hemorrhoids, fissures, and fistulas. Ann Gastroenterol 33(1):9–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salati SA (2021) Anal fissure—an extensive update. Pol Przegl Chir 93(4):46–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Newman M, Collie M (2019) Anal fissure: diagnosis, management, and referral in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 69(685):409–410

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Abramowitz L, Bouchard D, Siproudhis L, Trompette M, Pillant H, Bord C, Senejoux CA, Favreau-Weltzer C, Berdeaux G, Zkik A (2019) Psychometric properties of a questionnaire (HEMO-FISS-QoL) to evaluate the burden associated with haemorrhoidal disease and anal fissures. Colorectal Dis 21(1):48–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arısoy Ö, Şengül N, Çakir A (2017) Stress and psychopathology and its impact on quality of life in chronic anal fissure (CAF) patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(6):921–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Belsey J, Greenfield S, Candy D, Geraint M (2010) Systematic review: impact of constipation on quality of life in adults and children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31(9):938–949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Caetano AC, Oliveira D, Gomes Z, Mesquita E, Rolanda C (2017) Psychometry and Pescatori projective test in coloproctological patients. Ann Gastroenterol 30(4):433–437

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Miliacca C, Gagliardi G, Pescatori M (2010) The ‘Draw-the-Family Test’ in the preoperative assessment of patients with anorectal diseases and psychological distress: a prospective controlled study. Colorectal Dis 12(8):792–798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foxx-Orenstein AE, Umar SB, Crowell MD (2014) Common anorectal disorders. Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(5):294–301

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martowska K, Kołodziejczak M, Matczak A (2017) Temperamental characteristics and depressive symptoms in patients with mild proctological diseases based on research in 50 patients. A preliminary report. Nowa Medycyna 24:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cioli VM, Gagliardi G, Pescatori M (2015) Psychological stress in patients with anal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(8):1123–1129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Renzi C, Pescatori M (2000) Psychologic aspects in proctalgia. Dis Colon Rectum 43(4):535–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao SS, Seaton K, Miller MJ, Schulze K, Brown CK, Paulson J, Zimmerman B (2007) Psychological profiles and quality of life differ between patients with dyssynergia and those with slow transit constipation. J Psychosom Res 63(4):441–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yılmaz TU, Taş Hİ, Uçar E, Cerit C, Çelebi A, Güler SA, Utkan Z. Relationship between functional constipation and anal-retentive behavior features. Turk J Surg. 2018 Sep 21;35(3):165–170. https://doi.org/10.5578/turkjsurg.4035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goligher JC (1984) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, vol 5. Baillière Tindall, London, pp 98–149

    Google Scholar 

  21. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bottesi G, Ghisi M, Altoè G, Conforti E, Melli G, Sica C (2015) The Italian version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: factor structure and psychometric properties on community and clinical samples. Compr Psychiatry 60:170–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Henry JD, Crawford JR (2005) The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 44(Pt 2):227–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertolotti G, Zotti AM, Michielin P, Vidotto G, Sanavio E (1990) A computerized approach to cognitive behavioural assessment: an introduction to CBA-20 primary scales. J Behav Ther Expe Psychiatry 21(1):21–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanavio E, Bertolotti G, Michielin P, Vidotto G, Zotti AM (1997) CBA-2.0 cognitive behavioural assessment 2.0, scale primarie. Firenze, Organizzazioni Speciali

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG (1975) Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. Hodder and Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hodgson RJ, Rachman S (1977) Obsessional-compulsive complaints. Behav Res Ther 15(5):389–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanghvi P, Dey B (2019) Psychological management of anxiety in post-haemorrhoids surgery. J Psychosoc Res 14(1):149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hadasik K, Arasiewicz H, Brzezińska-Wcisło L (2021) Assessment of the anxiety and depression among patients with idiopathic pruritus ani. Adv Dermatol Allergol/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii 38(4):689–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee JH, Kim HE, Kang JH, Shin JY, Song YM (2014) Factors associated with hemorrhoids in Korean adults: Korean national health and nutrition examination survey. Korean J Fam Med 35(5):227–236

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jain M, Baijal R, Srinivas M, Venkataraman J (2019) Fecal evacuation disorders in anal fissure, hemorrhoids, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Indian J Gastroenterol 38(2):173–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Owen HA, Buchanan GN, Schizas A, Cohen R, Williams AB (2016) Quality of life with anal fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98(5):334–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu Y, Wang L, Liu J, Geng F, Li Y, Zheng L (2022) The relationship between anal disease and quality of life: a bibliometric study. Ann transl Med 10(8):484

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuiper SZ, Kimman ML, Rørvik HD, Olaison G, Breukink SO. Making Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Haemorrhoidal Disease in Clinical Practice: A Perspective. Front Surg. 2021 Aug 25;8:728532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.728532.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Navarro-Sánchez A, Luri-Prieto P, Compañ-Rosique A, Navarro-Ortiz R, Berenguer-Soler M, Gil-Guillén VF, Pérez-Jover V (2021) Sexuality, quality of life, anxiety, depression, and anger in patients with anal fissure: a case-control study. J Clin Med 10(19):4401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yue J (2021) Speaking shame and laughing it off: using humorous narrative to conquer the shame of anorectal illness. Qual Health Res 31(5):847–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tol RRV, Kimman ML, Breukink SO, Kuiper SZ, Melenhorst J, Stassen LP, Dirksen CD (2019) Experiences of patients with haemorrhoidal disease-a qualitative study. J Coloproctol 39:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM et al (2019) The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol rev 99(4):1877–2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Qin HY, Cheng CW, Tang XD, Bian ZX (2014) Impact of psychological stress on irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 20(39):14126–14131

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Margolis KG, Cryan JF, Mayer EA (2021) The microbiota-gut-brain axis: from motility to mood. Gastroenterology 160(5):1486–1501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Russo A, Pescatori M (2005) Psychological Assessment of Patients with Proctological Disorders. In: Complex Anorectal Disorders. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-057-5_40

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy

    Antonio Giuliani, Lucia Romano, Margherita Attanasio, Leonardo Tersigni, Elisabetta Iacobelli & Monica Mazza

Authors
  1. Antonio Giuliani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucia Romano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Margherita Attanasio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leonardo Tersigni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elisabetta Iacobelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Monica Mazza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Romano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giuliani, A., Romano, L., Attanasio, M. et al. Proctological disorders: psychometrics assessment of personality features and clinical evaluation. Updates Surg 75, 2291–2296 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01548-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01548-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation