Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contralateral internal iliac artery transposition for retroperitoneal sarcoma involving common iliac artery

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complete resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) involving major vessels frequently requires vascular resection and reconstruction. The use of artificial grafts often leads to postoperative vascular graft infection (VGI), which usually requires reoperation and sometimes leads to death. In the present study, the data of RPS patients who underwent contralateral iliac artery (IIA) transposition for reconstruction of the common iliac artery (CIA) after RPS resection from 2015–2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were described. Contralateral IIA transposition was performed to reconstruct the CIA after segmental resection in three patients. All patients underwent concomitant organ resection. Colon resection was performed for all patients, nephrectomy was performed for two patients, and segmental resection of the left ureter with transurethral ureterostomy was performed for one patient. Complete resection was achieved in all patients, and microscopic tumor infiltration to the CIA was observed in all patients (tunica adventitia: 2, tunica media: 1). No major complications occurred during the hospital stay. During the follow-up period (6.0–29.1 months), one patient died from tumor recurrence, and the other two patients did not have any evidence of recurrence or metastatic disease at the latest follow-up. The level of lower limb function was favorable (MSTS93 scores: 28–30). The pelvic organ functions, including bowel, bladder, and sexual functions, were not impaired in any of the patients. This novel technique in which contralateral IIA transposition is performed to reconstruct the CIA after RPS resection is simple and reliable and may be a good alternative to artificial grafts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Porter GA, Baxter NN, Pisters PW (2006) Retroperitoneal sarcoma: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, surgery, and radiotherapy. Cancer Am Cancer Soc 106:1610–1616. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Song TK, Harris EJ, Raghavan S, Norton JA (2009) Major blood vessel reconstruction during sarcoma surgery. Arch Surg 144:817–822. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Revest M, Camou F, Senneville E, Caillon J, Laurent F, Calvet B, Feugier P, Batt M, Chidiac C (2015) Medical treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infections: review of the literature and proposals of a Working Group. Int J Antimicrob Agents 46:254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.04.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gharamti A, Kanafani ZA (2018) Vascular graft infections: an update. Infect Dis Clin N Am 32:789–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2018.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coindre JM (2006) Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: review and update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1448–1453. https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165(2006)130[1448:GOSTSR]2.0.CO;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anaya DA, Lev DC, Pollock RE (2008) The role of surgical margin status in retroperitoneal sarcoma. J Surg Oncol 98:607–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ (1993) A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199301000-00035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cananzi FCM, Ruspi L, Galvanin J, Quagliuolo V (2019) Major vascular resection in retroperitoneal surgery. In: Quagliuolo V, Gronchi A (eds) Current treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas: a joint effort with the Italian society of surgical oncology. Springer, Milan, pp 77–92

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gronchi A, Lo VS, Fiore M, Mussi C, Stacchiotti S, Collini P, Lozza L, Pennacchioli E, Mariani L, Casali PG (2009) Aggressive surgical policies in a retrospectively reviewed single-institution case series of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma patients. J Clin Oncol 27:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.8871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonvalot S, Rivoire M, Castaing M, Stoeckle E, Le Cesne A, Blay JY, Laplanche A (2009) Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of surgical factors associated with local control. J Clin Oncol 27:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Radaelli S, Fiore M, Colombo C, Ford S, Palassini E, Sanfilippo R, Stacchiotti S, Sangalli C, Morosi C, Casali PG, Gronchi A (2016) Vascular resection en-bloc with tumor removal and graft reconstruction is safe and effective in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities and retroperitoneum. Surg Oncol 25:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2016.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group (2015) Management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the adult: a consensus approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group. Ann Surg Oncol 22:256–263. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3965-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group (2016) Management of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the adult: a consensus approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group. Ann Surg Oncol 23:3531–3540. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5336-7

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tzanis D, Bouhadiba T, Gaignard E, Bonvalot S (2018) Major vascular resections in retroperitoneal sarcoma. J Surg Oncol 117:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tseng WW, Wang SC, Eichler CM, Warren RS, Nakakura EK (2011) Complete and safe resection of challenging retroperitoneal tumors: anticipation of multi-organ and major vascular resection and use of adjunct procedures. World J Surg Oncol 9:143. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-9-143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bertrand MM, Carrere S, Delmond L, Mehta S, Rouanet P, Canaud L, Alric P, Quenet F (2016) Oncovascular compartmental resection for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with vascular involvement. J Vasc Surg 64:1033–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blair AB, Reames BN, Singh J, Gani F, Overton HN, Beaulieu RJ, Lum YW, Black JR, Johnston FM, Ahuja N (2018) Resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma en-bloc with inferior vena cava: 20 year outcomes of a single institution. J Surg Oncol 118:127–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25096

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson WR, Bower TC, Creager MA, Amin-Hanjani S, O'Gara PT, Lockhart PB, Darouiche RO, Ramlawi B, Derdeyn CP, Bolger AF, Levison ME, Taubert KA, Baltimore RS, Baddour LM (2016) Vascular graft infections, mycotic aneurysms, and endovascular infections: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 134:e412–e460. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fiore M, Colombo C, Locati P, Berselli M, Radaelli S, Morosi C, Casali PG, Gronchi A (2012) Surgical technique, morbidity, and outcome of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma involving inferior vena cava. Ann Surg Oncol 19:511–518. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1954-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ehsan O, Gibbons CP (2009) A 10-year experience of using femoro-popliteal vein for re-vascularisation in graft and arterial infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.03.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fernandez-Alonso L, Fernandez-Alonso S, Aguilar EM (2017) Iliac artery reconstruction with the superficial femoral vein after major oncologic resection. Vasc Endovascular Surg 51:350–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574417704559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McKay A, Motamedi M, Temple W, Mack L, Moore R (2007) Vascular reconstruction with the superficial femoral vein following major oncologic resection. J Surg Oncol 96:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Luu HY, Wang ED, Syed SM, Xu X, Hansen SL, Eichler CM, Nakakura EK (2018) Outcomes of arterial bypass preceding resection of retroperitoneal masses involving major vessels. J Surg Res 230:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Modrall JG, Sadjadi J, Ali AT, Anthony T, Welborn MR, Valentine RJ, Hynan LS, Clagett GP (2004) Deep vein harvest: predicting need for fasciotomy. J Vasc Surg 39:387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2003.10.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Landreneau RJ, Mitchum P, Fry WJ (1989) Iliac arterial transposition. Arch Surg 124:978–981. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410080114019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lazzeri M, Benaim G, Turini D, Beneforti P, Turini F (1997) Iatrogenic external iliac artery disruption during open pelvic lymph node dissection: successful repair with hypogastric artery transposition. Scand J Urol Nephrol 31:205–207. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599709070332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Klonaris C, Katsargyris A, Papapetrou A, Vourliotakis G, Tsiodras S, Georgopoulos S, Giannopoulos A, Bastounis E (2007) Infected femoral artery pseudoaneurysm in drug addicts: the beneficial use of the internal iliac artery for arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 45:498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mishra B, Joshi MK, Gupta B, Farooque K (2018) Internal iliac artery transposition for vascular reconstruction in a patient with life-threatening iatrogenic common iliac artery injury. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2016-219138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Joh JH, Choi SI, Kim SH, Park HC (2014) Hypogastric artery transposition to restore the arterial flow after resection of the external iliac artery. Vasc Specialist Int 30:91–93. https://doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2014.30.3.91

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bourne AC, Kraiss LW, Holden JA, Mone MC, Barton RG (2002) Radical resection of a malignant mesenchymoma with hypogastric artery transposition. J Surg Oncol 80:214–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.10121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bonde A, Velmahos A, Kalva SP, Mendoza AE, Kaafarani H, Nederpelt CJ (2019) Bilateral internal iliac artery embolization for pelvic trauma: effectiveness and safety. Am J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh A, Kishore R, Saxena SS (2016) Ligating internal iliac artery: success beyond hesitation. J Obstet Gynaecol India 66:235–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0859-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Andriole GL, Sugarbaker PH (1985) Perineal and bladder necrosis following bilateral internal iliac artery ligation. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 28:183–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaisary AV, Smith P (1985) Spinal cord ischemia after ligation of both internal iliac arteries during radical cystoprostatectomy. Urology 25:395–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(85)90498-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospital’s Ascent Plan [Grant number DFL20181104].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CP-L and CY-H contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and data analysis were performed by BN-L and JH-W. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CP-L, and all authors reviewed previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Yi Hao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures described herein were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, CP., Liu, BN., Wu, JH. et al. Contralateral internal iliac artery transposition for retroperitoneal sarcoma involving common iliac artery. Updates Surg 74, 1157–1163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00843-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00843-1

Keywords

Navigation