Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of inverted-V bracing on retrofitting against progressive collapse of steel moment resisting frames

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of inverted-V bracing on enhancing progressive collapse resistance of steel Moment Resisting Frames (MRF) were investigated in this study. A series of nonlinear static and dynamic analyses were performed to determine the resistance of four generic MRFs retrofitted by ten inverted-V bracing element. These structures were subjected to an exterior column loss and had a different number of stories and span lengths in order to study the effect of these variations on the structural response. Both force-controlled and deformation-controlled actions were implemented to determine if the column loss would lead to a failure progression. Results showed that structural configuration affects the structural resistance against failure progression and hence the appropriate brace element to retrofit it. Also, it was shown that for the studied 4-story frames, by increasing the span length by 20%, the structural resistance decreases by 42% on average. Finally, it was observed that by decreasing the span length, the Dynamic Increase Factor (DIF) suggested by the UFC, will lead to underestimating the required cross-sectional area of the brace for strengthening the unbraced structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AISC 341-05 (2005). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction. Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • AISC 360-05 (2005). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction. Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE 7-05 (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, VA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE 41-06 (2007). Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, VA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R., Wenger, W. and Popov, E. (1980). “Inelastic buckling of steel struts under cyclic load reversal.” Report No: EERC-80/40. Earthquake Engineering Research Center Berkeley (CA): University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai, A. S. and Di Sarno, L. (2008), Fundamentals of earthquake engineering, Wiley Chichester. UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, F. (2012). “Response of a multi-storey steel composite building with concentric bracing under consecutive column removal scenarios.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 70 (2012), pp. 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSA (2003). Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects, General Services Administration. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi Rezvani, F. and Asgarian, B. (2014). “Effect of seismic design level on safety against progressive collapse of concentrically braced frames.” Steel and Composite Structures, 16 (2), pp. 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal, K, and El-Tawil, S. (2011). “Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis.” Engineering Structures, 33 (9), pp. 2653–2661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheyroddin, A., Gerami, M., and Mehrabi, F. (2014). “Assessment of the dynamic effect of steel frame due to sudden middle column loss.” Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23 (5), pp. 392–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. and Lee, H. (2013). “Progressive collapse-resisting capacity of framed structures with infill steel panels.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 89 (2013), pp. 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. and Hao, H. (2013). “Numerical study of structural progressive collapse using substructure technique.” Engineering Structures, 52 (2013), pp. 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. (2013). “New dynamic increase factor for nonlinear static alternate path analysis of building frames against progressive collapse.” Engineering Structures. 48 (2013), pp. 666–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. (2015). “Pulldown Analysis for Progressive Collapse Assessment.” Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 29 (1), 04014027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L. (2007). OpenSees command Language manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISTIR 7396 (2007). Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings. U.S. Department of Commerce: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, B. I., Giriunas, K. A., and Sezen, H. (2014). “Progressive collapse testing and analysis of a steel frame building.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 94 (2014), pp. 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szyniszewski, S. and Krauthammer, T. (2012). “Energy flow in progressive collapse of steel framed buildings.” Engineering Structures, 42 (2012), pp. 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, M. H. and You, Z. K. (2012). “Experimental evaluation of inelastic dynamic amplification factors for progressive collapse analysis under sudden support loss.” Mechanics Research Communications, 40 (2012), pp. 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UFC (2009). Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, Department of Defence: Unified Facilities Criteria, UFC 4-023-03. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos, D. and Allin Cornell, C. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31 (3), pp. 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid Reza Ronagh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashemi Rezvani, F., Taghizadeh, M.A.M. & Ronagh, H.R. Effect of inverted-V bracing on retrofitting against progressive collapse of steel moment resisting frames. Int J Steel Struct 17, 1103–1113 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-9019-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-9019-4

Keywords

Navigation