Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Background

Carbon emissions are responsible for global warming. Countries around the world are trying to reduce carbon emission.

Purpose

This article throws light on carbon neutrality and the need of reducing carbon emissions.

Methods

Operating theatre environment is a site of carbon emissions. Identifying sources and ways to reducing carbon emission by surgeons is a start to achieve a greener surgical environment.

Results

The article discusses the aforementioned and the need to achieve better carbon profile of surgical setups without compromising patient safety.

Conclusion

Global warming is at the forefront of most industries today. The medical field is one such industry which needs to look into the carbon emissions on a day-to-day basis. Reducing sources of carbon emissions will make operating theatres more eco-friendly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Ball S, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet. 2009;373(9676):1693-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1. Erratum in: Lancet. 2009;373(9682):2200. PMID: 19447250

  2. MacNeill AJ, Lillywhite R, Brown CJ. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(9):e381–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6. (Epub 2017 Dec 8 PMID: 29851650).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rizan C, Steinbach I, Nicholson R, Lillywhite R, Reed M, Bhutta MF. The carbon footprint of surgical operations: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2020;272(6):986–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003951. (PMID: 32516230).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pradere B, Mallet R, de La Taille A, Bladou F, et al. Sustainability task force of the french association of urology. Climate-smart actions in the operating theatre for improving sustainability practices: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2023;83(4):331–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.027. (Epub 2022 Feb 10 PMID: 35151515).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aldoori J, Hartley J, MacFie J. Sustainable surgery: in and out of the operating theatre. Br J Surg. 2021;108(6):e219–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab073. (PMID: 33713111).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Power NE, Silberstein JL, Ghoneim TP, Guillonneau B, Touijer KA. Environmental impact of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: an estimate of the carbon dioxide footprint. J Endourol. 2012;26(12):1639–44. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0298. (Epub 2012 Oct 16 PMID: 22845049 PMCID: PMC3521130).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Woods DL, McAndrew T, Nevadunsky N, Hou JY, et al. Carbon footprint of robotically-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: a comparison. Int J Med Robot. 2015;11(4):406–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1640. (Epub 2015 Feb 22 PMID: 25708320).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Papadopoulou A, Kumar NS, Vanhoestenberghe A, Francis NK. Environmental sustainability in robotic and laparoscopic surgery: systematic review. Br J Surg. 2022;109(10):921–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac191. (PMID: 35726503).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB. Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1): e1918911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dzau VJ, Levine R, Barrett G, Witty A. Decarbonizing the US Health Sector—a call to action. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(23):2117–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2115675. (Epub 2021 Oct 13 PMID: 34644470).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan KS, Lo HY, Shelat VG. Carbon footprints in minimally invasive surgery: good patient outcomes, but costly for the environment. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;15(7):1277–85. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1277. (PMID: 37555111).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav S. Desai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interest and no funding.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Gaurav S. Desai is a MS FCPS.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Desai, G.S. The Carbon-Neutral Operating Theatre. J Obstet Gynecol India (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-01949-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-01949-x

Keywords

Navigation