Skip to main content
Log in

Changing Trends of Obstetric Hysterectomy Over Last 2 Decades: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center Tertiary Care Rural Teaching Hospital of Western India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The primary objective of our study to analyze the trend of obstetric hysterectomy (OH) over last 2 decade in rural tertiary care referral center of western India.

Design

Retrospective observational and comparative study from single rural tertiary care referral center of western India.

Method

A retrospective data collected of patients who underwent OH from Jan 2001 to Dec 2021. Each patient studied in detail for demographic and clinical profile, indication of OH, Intra operative and post operative complication and feto-maternal outcome. Patient of first decade (2001 to 2010) compared with second decade (2011 to 2021) to see the changing trend of OH.

Results

Total 19,666 patients delivered in study period.195 patient underwent OH. Incidence of OH is 0.9%. 171 out of 195 patients were referred (87%). If we see the trend of OH over 2 decades 2001 to 2010 and 2011 to 2021 incidence of OH slightly raised from 0.87% to 1.07% (p 0.16). Although Incidence of OH in cesarean delivery rises from 0.6 to 1.4% (p 0.6) but this change due to overall increase in cesarean section rate from 37 to 49%(p < 0.0001). Indication of OH significantly change as uterine rupture decrease significantly from 61 to 22%(p < 0.001) and morbidly adherent placenta increases from 7 to 23%(p 0.007). ICU admission and ventilator support increases from 54 to 79%(p 0.04) and 22% to 70% (p < 0.001), respectively, due to improved critical care services, but maternal death remains relatively same 15% & 20% (p 0.5).

Conclusion

Primary CS rates should be decreased to prevent adherent placenta spectrum disorders. Good antenatal care and development of a robust referral system can decrease maternal mortality. Greater utilization of skill laboratory and simulators will go a long way in developing the skills of aspiring doctors in operative vaginal deliveries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell SF, Watkins A, John M, et al. Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage defined by quantitative blood loss measurement: a national cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bajwa SK, Bajwa SJS. Delivering obstetric critical care in developing nations. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2012;2(1):32–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sparić R, Kadija S, Hudelist G, et al. History of caesarean hysterectomy. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2012;59(1):9–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell SM, Corcoran P, Manning E, et al. Peripartum hysterectomy incidence, risk factors and clinical characteristics in Ireland. European J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 2016;207:56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kallianidis AF, Maraschini A, Danis J, et al. Epidemiological analysis of peripartum hysterectomy across nine European countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(10):1364–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Flood KM, Said S, Geary M, et al. Changing trends in peripartum hysterectomy over the last 4 decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(6):632.e1-632.e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chawla J, Arora D, Paul M, et al. Emergency Obstetric Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital in North India over Eight Years. Oman Med J. 2015;30(3):181–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rana S, Kattel P, Prasad Deep J. Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Five Year Analysis. Nepal J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2020, [cited 2022 Sep 16];15(2). Available from: https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NJOG/article/view/32902

  10. Rawashdeh H, Obeidat R, Masa’deh L. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary teaching hospital in Northern Jordan: a 15-year review. Gynecol Surg. 2021;18(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rani PR, Begum J. Recent advances in the management of major postpartum haemorrhage–A review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(2):QE01-5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleming ET, Yule CS, Lafferty AK, et al. Changing patterns of peripartum hysterectomy over time. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138(5):799–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta N, Dragovic K, Trester R, et al. The changing scenario of obstetrics and gynaecology residency training. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(3):401–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. James AH, Federspiel JJ, Ahmadzia HK. Disparities in obstetric haemorrhage outcomes. Res Pract Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2022;6(1): e12656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pettersen S, Falk RS, Vangen S, et al. Peripartum hysterectomy due to severe postpartum haemorrhage: a hospital-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(7):819–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Heitkamp A, Seinstra J, van den Akker T, et al. A district-wide population-based descriptive study of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a middle-income country. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;146(1):103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Qayum K, Kar I, Sofi J, et al. Single- versus double-layer uterine closure after cesarean section delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e18405. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Vachon-Marceau C, Demers S, Bujold E, et al. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):65.e1-65.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Faralli I, Del Negro V, Chinè A, et al. Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder: ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(11):2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Del Negro V, Aleksa N, Galli C, et al. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder: ideation of an ultrasonographic score and correlation with surgical and neonatal outcomes. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;11(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010023.PMID:33375532;PMCID:PMC7824485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Selman AE. Caesarean hysterectomy for placenta praevia/accreta using an approach via the pouch of Douglas. BJOG. 2016;123(5):815–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13762.Epub.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hussein AM, Dakhly DMR, Raslan AN, et al. The role of prophylactic internal iliac artery ligation in abnormally invasive placenta undergoing caesarean hysterectomy: a randomized control trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(20):3386–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1463986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study not funded by any authority.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishal Sheth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors undersigned declare that they have no any conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any animal studies. Ethical approval taken from HREC committee of institution before conducting this study. All authors declare that this article not under consideration for publication anywhere.

Informed consent

Written informed consent taken from all patients included in our study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Vishal Sheth is a Associate professor; Smruti Vaishnav is a professor and head; Shilpa Sapre is a professor; Rumi Bhattacharjee is a professor; Nitin Raithatha is an professor and Manisha Asrani is an Intern.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheth, V., Vaishnav, S., Sapre, S. et al. Changing Trends of Obstetric Hysterectomy Over Last 2 Decades: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center Tertiary Care Rural Teaching Hospital of Western India. J Obstet Gynecol India 73 (Suppl 2), 206–212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01842-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01842-z

Keywords

Navigation