Skip to main content
Log in

Treating Dehiscence During Implant Placement and Loading on Angled Abutment in Maxillary Lateral Incisor Region: A Case Report

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

The primary factor causing recession is the morphology and anatomy of the dentition. The facial bony plate overlying the root is usually very thin. The complete absence of bone over the facial root surface is referred to as dehiscence. Such buccal bone defects in case of implant dentistry threaten the survival of dental implant. Many surgical techniques are introduced to enhance alveolar bone volume for placing the dental implants. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is one such established surgical technique for correcting buccal dehiscence defects, along with the use of various barrier membranes for the same. This case report describes an implant placement in the maxillary left lateral incisor region showing dehiscence on the labial cortical plate, along with bone graft and GTR membrane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Abed AM, Pestekan RH, Yaghini J, Razavi SM, Tavakoli M, Amjadi M (2011) A comparison of two types of decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in treatment of dehiscence defects around implants in dogs. Dent Res J 8(3):132–137

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carmagnola D, Berglundh T, Araujo M, Albrektsson T, Lindhe J (2000) Bone healing around implants placed in a jaw defect augmented with Bio-Oss: an experimental study in dogs. J ClinPeriodontol 27(11):799–805

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christoph HF, Jung HE, Jung RE, Lindhe J, Lang NP, Ridge Karring T (2008) Augmentation procedures. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. Oxford, Blackwel, pp 1084–1092

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melloing JT, Triplett RG (1993) Guided tissue regeneration and endosseous dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 13:109–119

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buser D, Dula K, Belser UC, Hirt HP, Berthold H (1993) Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. I. Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 13:29–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oda T, Sawaki Y, Ueda M (2000) Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implant placement. IntJ Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cordaro L, Sarzi AD, Cordaro M (2002) Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:103–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T (2002) Alveolar ridge augmentation by combining autogenous mandibular bone grafts and non-resorbable membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T (2002) Alveolar ridge augmentation using a resorbable copolymer membrane and autogenous bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:192–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T (2002) Augmentation of the rat jaw with autogeneiccortico-cancellous bone grafts and guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:203–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Yaman D, Lang NP (2008) Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases. ClinOral Implants Res 19(1):19–25

    Google Scholar 

  12. Becker W, Lekholm U, Dahlin C, Becker BE, Donath K (1994) The effect of clinical loading on bone regenerated by gtam barriers: a study in dogs. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 9:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nowzari H, Slots J (1995) Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for guided bone regeneration around implants. IntJ Oral Maxillofac Implants 10:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Keil C, Wegscheider WA (1998) Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:639–646

  15. Jung RE, Zwahlen R, Weber FE, Molenberg A, Van Lenthe GH, Hammerle CH (2006) Evaluation of an in situ formed synthetic hydrogel as a biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:426–433

  16. Rosen PS, Mark A (2001) Reynolds guided bone regeneration for dehiscence and fenestration defects on implants using an absorbablepolymer barrier. J Periodontol 72(2):250–256

  17. Lee S-H, Hyun-Joong Y, Park M-K, Kim Y-S (2008) Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23(6):1089–1094

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavallaro J Jr, Greenstein G (2011) Angled implant abutments: a practical application of available knowledge. J Am Dent Assoc 142:150–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Sumanth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sumanth, K.S., Savitha, B., Lotwani, V. et al. Treating Dehiscence During Implant Placement and Loading on Angled Abutment in Maxillary Lateral Incisor Region: A Case Report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14 (Suppl 1), 319–322 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0376-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0376-9

Keywords

Navigation