Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparative Study on the Relationship Between Inter Alar Width, and Inter Commissural Width on Circumferential Arc Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Different Age Groups

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

This study was done to determine the relationship between interalar width and inter commissural width on circumferential arc width of maxillary anterior teeth in dentulous subjects between the age groups of 20–50 years. The study involved 300 subjects, in whom measurements were made from the distal aspect of each maxillary canine, across the facial surfaces of the six anterior teeth, using brass wire and a Vernier calliper. Interalar and inter commissural width were recorded after placing two points and measured with a Vernier calliper. Results were statistically analyzed using unpaired t test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Pearson’s correlation coefficient test. This study confirmed the reliability of interalar width to determine the circumferential arc width which can be used as a reference in edentulous patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Owens EG, Goodacre JC, Loh PL, Hanke G, Okamura M, Jo K et al (2002) A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 1: a comparison of intraoral parameters. Int J Prosthodont 15:273–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pound E (1954) Lost fine arts in the fallacy of ridges. J Prosthet Dent 4:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Philip Schiffman (1964) Relation of the maxillary canines to the incisive papilla. J Prosthet Dent 14:469–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ricketts, Robert M (1968) Esthetics environment and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthodontics 54:272–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shillingburg HT, Kalpan MJ (1972) Grace SC. Tooth dimensions—A comparative study. J South Calif Dent Assistants Assoc 40:830–839

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sidney I, Silverman (1967) Complete denture esthetics and its relation to facial esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 75:89–100

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kern EB (1967) Anthropometric parameters of tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent 17:431–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasanreisoglu U et al (2005) An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 94:530–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gomes VL et al (2009) Interalar distance to estimate the combined width of the six maxillary anterior teeth in oral rehabilitation treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent 21:26–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Puri M, Bhalla LR, Khanna VK (1972) Relationship of intercanine distance with the distance between the alae of nose. J Indiana Dent Assoc 4:46–49

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keng SB (1986) Nasal width dimensions and anterior teeth in prosthodontics. Ann Acad Med Singap 15:311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Picard E (1958) Complete denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent 8:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee HJ (1964) The appearance of artificial dentures. Aust Dent J 9:304–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wehner PJ, Hickey JC, Boucher CO (1967) Selection of artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 18:222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mavroskoufis F (1981) Ritchie G.M. Nasal width and incisive papilla as guides for the selection and arrangement of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 6:592–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scandrett RF, Kerber EP, Umrigar RA (1982) A clinical evaluation of techniques to determine the combined width of the maxillary anterior teeth and the maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 48:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffman W, Bomberg TJ (1986) Interalar width as a guide in denture tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent 55:219–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rai R (2010) Correlation of Nasal width to inter-canine distance in various arch forms. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 10:123–127

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith BJ (1975) The value of the nose width as an esthetic guide in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 34:562–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Latta GH Jr et al (1991) The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 65:250–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fariaby J et al (2005) Photographic analysis of faces of 20-year-old students in Iran. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:393–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McArthur DR (1985) Determining approximate size of maxillary anterior artificial teeth when mandibular teeth are present. Part I: size relationship. J Prosthet Dent 53:216–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmad I (2005) Anterior dental aesthetics: dental perspective. Br Dent J 199:135–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjana Kurien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurien, A., Cherian, K.P., Mhatre, S. et al. A Comparative Study on the Relationship Between Inter Alar Width, and Inter Commissural Width on Circumferential Arc Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Different Age Groups. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14, 352–357 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0329-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0329-8

Keywords

Navigation