Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Production strategies of organic basmati rice in Tarai region of Uttarakhand, India

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India, during rainy season 2012 to 2014 to explore possible outcomes of sustainable production of organic basmati rice in terms of productivity, water use efficiency and methane emission reduction in North Western Himalayas of India. Six sets of nutrient management and production technology treatments were taken in randomized block design (RBD) with three replications. Traditional basmati rice variety type 3 popularly known as Dehraduni Basmati was taken for study. Dry matter production, crop growth rate and effective tillers were found higher in green manuring (GM) + vermicompost (VC) during all the 3 years. Overall highest grain yield of basmati rice (average over 3 years) was found in GM + VC with Sesbania aculeate (3209 kg ha−1) followed by System of Rice Intensification (SRI) (3174 kg ha−1), while lowest grain yield of basmati rice was recorded in organic control (2871 kg ha−1). However, only four treatments were considered to quantify methane (CH4) flux. Maximum CH4 flux was observed at panicle initiation stage (55 days after transplanting (DAT)). Across the crop growth period, GM + VC, farmyard manure (FYM) + VC, SRI and chemical control produced an average CH4 flux of 20.19, 13.00, 9.83 and 5.53 mg m−2 h−1, respectively. This shows that among the nutrient sources, CH4 emission was higher in organically fertilized plots as compared to chemically fertilized with urea at initial stages; however, at later stages, not much variation was observed in CH4 emission for different nutrient sources. Even with in organic system, less CH4 was emitted from SRI field where water was maintained through alternate wetting and drying system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anitha S, Mathew J (2010) In situ green manuring with dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata Pers.): a cost effective management alternative for wet seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Trop Agric 48(1–2):34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulakh MS, Bodenbender J, Wassmann R, Rennenberg H (2000) Methane transport capacity of rice plants influence of methane concentration and growth stage analyzed with an automated measuring system. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 58:357–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bana OPS, Pant K (2000) Green manuring for ecologically sound crop production. Indian Farmers Digest 33(2):19–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisht PS, Puniya R, Pandey PC, Singh DK (2007) Grain yield and yield components of rice as influenced by different crop establishment methods. Int Rice Res Notes 32(2):33–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman BAM, Peng S, Castan AR, Visperas RM (2009) Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agric Water Manag 74:87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruderie K, Shambu P, Roy S (2009) Vulnerability reduction and adaption experiences from Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh: the System of Rice Intensification. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Vulnerability and Assessment Programme, India, pp. 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury MR, Kumar V, Sattar A, Brahmachari K (2014) Studies on the water use efficiency and nutrient uptake by rice under system of intensification. The Bioscan 9(1):85–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland DJ, (1997) “Rice farming today. In: The sustainability of rice farming”. CAB International, Oxon, UK and New York, USA. IRRI, Manilla, Philippines, 273

  • Dejene M, Lemlem M (2012) Integrated agronomic crop managements to improve Tef productivity under terminal drought. In: Md. Rahman M, Hasegawa H (eds) Water Stress, InTech Open Science, pp: 235–254

  • Delaune RD, Smith CJ, Patrick WH (1986) Methane production in Mississippi River deltaic plain peat. Org Geochem 9:193–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain MC, Kumar S, Wassmann R, Mitra S, Singh SD, Singh JP, Gupta S (2000) Methane emissions from irrigated rice fields in northern India, New Delhi. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 58(1–3):75–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kar B, Karmakar S, Saha G, and Bhattacharya R (2014) Estimation of methane flux on rice field as influenced by plant climate under varied management practices. In; International symposium on New Dimension in Agrometeorology for Sustainable Agriculture 16–18 Oct 34p

  • Khan NI, Malik AU, Umer F, Bodla MI (2010) Effect of tillage and farm yard manure on physical properties of soil. Int Res J Plant Sci 1(4):75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Rawat CR, Dhar S, Rai Suchit K (2005) Dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake and changes in soil fertility status as influenced by different organic and inorganic sources of nutrients to forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolour). Indian J Agri Sci 75(6):340–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukham E, Krishanranjan J, Premshekhar M (2004) Irrigation and nitrogen application schedule for hybrid ‘ADTRH 1’ rice (Oryza sativa) in Tamil Nadu. Indian J Agron 49(1):37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan A, Bhagat RM, Gupta RD (2008) Integrated nutrient management in sustainable rice-wheat cropping system for food security in India. SAARC J Agri 6(2):29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S, Jain MC, Kumar S, Bandyopadhyay SK, Kalra N (1999) Effect of rice cultivars on methane emission. Agri Ecosyst Environ 73(3):177–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R (2011) Aerobic rice system. Adv Agron 111:207–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna Y, Singh S, Parihar S (2007) Influence of irrigation regime and nitrogen management on productivity, nitrogen uptake and water use by rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agron 52(2):102–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AB, Ganguly TK (2005) Quality comparison of conventional compost, vermicompost and chemically rich compost. J Ind Soc Soil Science 53(3):352–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh DK, Singh G, Gupta S, Arora M, Verma S (2012) Yield sustainability and quality of basmati rice as influenced by conventional, organic and integrated modes of cultivation. Oryza 49(2):102–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RP, Bali SV, Gupta DK (2001) Soil fertility and productivity of rice-wheat cropping system in an Inceptisoil as influenced by integrated nutrient management. Indian J Agric Sci 71:82–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, Sixth edn. Publishing Corp. Calcutta, Oxford and IBH

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi HP, Jaishwal LM (2006) Effect of nitrogen on yield and yield attributes of rice hybrids under irrigated condition. Oryza 43(3):249–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang MX, Shangguan XJ (1995) Methane emission from various rice fields in China. In: Climate change and rice. Springer Publishers, IRRI, pp. 67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF-ICRISAT Project (2010) More rice for people, more water for the planet. Africare, Oxfam America, WWF-ICRISAT Project, Hyderabad, India pp 1-35

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. K. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, D.K., Akhtar, Z., Gupta, S. et al. Production strategies of organic basmati rice in Tarai region of Uttarakhand, India. Org. Agr. 7, 21–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0143-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0143-1

Keywords

Navigation