Skip to main content
Log in

The History of Lymphatic Anatomy and the Contribution of Frederik Ruysch

  • Medical History
  • Published:
Hellenic Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Discovery of the lymphatic system is documented in numerous sources and can be attributed to a variety of persons. Like many other important developments in medicine, the recognition of the lymphatic system starts with Hippocrates (ca. 460–370 BC), who described a disease course consistent with metastasis to lymph nodes. Until the 17th century, knowledge about the anatomy and pathophysiology of the lymphatic system was limited, probably because of the difficulty of visualizing lymph vessels in animals and humans. Frederik Ruysch (1638-1731), a “praelector anatomiae” of the Amsterdam Guild of Surgeons, must be considered one of the pioneers in lymphatic research. His contribution relied on meticulous anatomical dissection of lymph vessels, and with his innovative preservation techniques, he was the first to visualize lymphatic valves. This major step provided a better understanding of lymphatic anatomy and the circulation of lymph. The German pathologist Rudolf Virchow (1821–1902) suggested that lymph nodes function as filters in the lymphatic system and could therefore contain cancer. He was the first to propose that lymph fluid from any given area of the body drains through lymphatics to a specific lymph node and subsequently to other lymph nodes. Consequently, clinicians began to recommend that local therapy of cancer should be supplemented with regional lymph node treatment to improve the cure rate. Subsequently, lymph node surgery became an essential element of surgical oncology. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy were developed several decades ago by Donald Morton (1934–2014) to stage melanoma accurately and to avoid unnecessary lymph node dissection. In a way, history is now repeating itself, as today there is renewed interest in imaging lymph vessels and lymph nodes from an oncological perspective, more than 300 years since Ruysch committed himself to visualizing the lymphatic system. From this perspective, it is important to acknowledge early contributions of Ruysch in providing the foundations to our knowledge of lymphatic anatomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nieweg OE, Uren RF, Thompson JF. The history of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Cancer J 2015;21:3–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Karpozilos A, Pavlidis N. The treatment of cancer in Greek antiquity. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:2033–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hewson W. An inquiry into the properties of the blood. In: Gulliver G, ed. The Works of William Hewson FRS. London: Sydenham Society; 1846.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loukas M, Bellary SS, Kuklinski M, et al. The lymphatic system: a historical perspective. Clin Anat 2011;24:807–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singer C. The evolution of Anatomy. 2nd ed. New York: Dover Publications, Inc; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aselli G. De lactibus sive lacteis venis, quarto vasorum mesarai corum genere invento. 2nd ed. Milan, Italy: Bidellius JB; 1627.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Asellius G. De lactibus, sive lacteis venis quarto vasorum mesarai corum genere, novo invento Gasparis Asellii dissertatio: Qua sententiae anatomicae multae vel perperam receptae convelluntur, vel parum perceptae illustrantur. Bazel: Henric-Petrinis; 1628.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delamere G, Poirier P, Cuneo B. The lymphatics. In: Charpy PP, ed. A treatise of human anatomy. Westminster, UK: Archibald Constable and Co Ltd; 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loukas M, Bellary SS, Kuklinski M, et al. The lymphatic system: A historical perspective. Clin Anat 2011;24:807–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chikly B. Who discovered the lymphatic system. Lymphology 1997;30:186–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Horne J. Novus ductus chyliferus. Leiden: Lugduni Batavorum; 1652.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bartholin T. De lacteis thoracis in homine brutisque nuperrime observatis. Martzan M, ed. Copenhagen: Hafniae; 1652.

  13. Sappey PhC. Anatomie, physiologie, pathologie des vaisseaux lymphatiques considérés chez l'homme et les vertébrés. Paris, France: A. Delahaye et E. Lacrosnier; 1874.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kooijmans L. De doodskunstenaar, de anatomische lessen van Frederik Ruysch. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Middelkoop NE. Nieuw leven voor Adriaen Backers Anatomische les van Dr. Frederick Ruysch. Amstelodamum 2005;92–1:3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ijpma FF, van Gulik TM. "Anatomy lesson of Frederik Ruysch" of 1670: A tribute to Ruysch's contributions to lymphatic anatomy. World J Surg 2013;37:1996–2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Bree E, Schoretsanitis G. The Amsterdam Guild of Surgeons and the training of surgeons in the early modern period. Hell J Surg 2018;90:205–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Bree E, Tsiaoussis J, Schoretsanitis G. Anatomy lessons by the Amsterdam Guild of Surgeons. Medical education and art. Hell J Surg 2018;90:267–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baljet B. The painted Amsterdam anatomy lessons: Anatomy performances in dissecting rooms? Ann Anat 2000;182:3–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Anatomy Book of the Amsterdam Guild of Surgeons (1631–1731). Amsterdam: Amsterdam Guild of Surgeons; 1731.

  21. Arlebout YF. Alle de ontleed-, genees-, en heelkundige werken van Frederick Ruysch. Amsterdam: Janssoons van Waesberge; 1744.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harvey M. Exercitatio anatomica de motu cordis et sanguinis in animalibus. Frankfurt: William Fitzer; 1628.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hanson JV. Resurrecting death: Anatomical art in the cabinet of Dr. Frederik Ruysch. Art Bull 1996;78:663–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruysch F. Dilucidatio valvularum in vasis lymphaticis et lacteis cum figuris aeneis, accesserunt quaedam observations anatomicae rariores. The Hague, The Netherlands: Herman Gael; 1665.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mirilas P, Lainas P, Panutsopulos D, et al. The monarch and the master: Peter the Great and Frederik Ruysch. Arch Surg 2006;141:602–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Driessen-van het Reve JJ. De Kunstkamera van Peter de Grote: De Hollandse inbreng, gereconstrueerd uit brieven van Albert Seba en Johann Daniel Schumacher uit de Jaren 1711–1752. Hilversum: Verloren; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Boer L, Radziun AB, Oostra RJ. Frederik Ruysch (1638-1731): Historical perspective and contemporary analysis of his teratological legacy. Am J Med Genet A 2017;173:16–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Radziun A, Chistov Y. The first scientific collections of Kunstkamera. St. Petersburg: DITON; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Virchow R. Die Krankhaften Geschwulste. Berlin, Germany: August Hirschwald; 1863

    Google Scholar 

  30. Virchow RLK. Cellular Pathology 1859. Special Edition. London: John Churchill; 1978:204–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sappey PC, Karmanski A, Beau É, et al. Anatomie, physiologie, pathologie des vaisseaux lymphatiques considérés chez l'homme et les vertébrés. Paris, France: Adrien Delahaye, Imprimerie de E. Martinet; 1874.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Halsted WS. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June 1889 to January 1894. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull 1894;4:297–323.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Snow H. Melanotic cancerous disease. Lancet 1892;ii:872–4.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Neuhaus SJ, Clark MA, Thomas JM. Dr. Herbert Lumley Snow, MD, MRCS (1847-1930): The original champion of elective lymph node dissection in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:875–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 1992;127:392–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Valsecchi ME, Silbermins D, de Rosa N, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma: A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1479–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. van der Ploeg IM, Nieweg OE, van Rijk MC, et al. Axillary recurrence after a tumour-negative sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34:1277–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Niebling MG, Pleijhuis RG, Bastiaannet E, et al. A systematic review and meta-analyses of sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer and melanoma, a plea for tracer mapping. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:466–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Goyal A. New Technologies for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection. Breast Care (Basel) 2018;13:349–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Final trial report of sentinel node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:599–609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Completion dissection or observation for sentinel-node metastasis in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2211–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:927–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Giuliano AE, Ballman K, McCall L, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: Long-term follow-up from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg 2016;264:413–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP, et al. Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol 2005;173:816–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Slomovitz BM, Coleman RL, Oonk MH, et al. Update on sentinel lymph node biopsy for early-stage vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015;138:472–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eelco de Bree.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Bree, E., Tsiaoussis, J. & Schoretsanitis, G. The History of Lymphatic Anatomy and the Contribution of Frederik Ruysch. Hellenic J Surg 90, 308–314 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-018-0495-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-018-0495-6

Key words

Navigation