Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative evaluation of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis vs acute cholecystitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hellenic Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Aim-Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) during index admission for acute cholecystitis (AC) is now an established procedure, but timing for LC in gallstone-induced acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is still controversial. Interval cholecystectomy is justified in cases of severe pancreatitis, however, in patients with mild disease, which constitute the majority (80%) of the cases, patients can safely be operated during the index admission. The profile of patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis and AC appears to be similar, since both are complications of gallstone disease. The LC in both situations is equally challenging, due to risk of inflammation and adhesions. However, both conditions are likely to benefit from early LC, in terms of rapid recovery and shortened hospital stay. But no author has compared the outcome of LC in these two similar clinical entities in the past. Hence the present study compares the outcome of LC in case of mild ABP versus AC.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study was conducted on 77 patients undergoing LC for AC with or without pancreatitis, during index admission. Cases were divided into two groups of mild ABP (n=25) and AC (n=52). Both groups were compared with respect to the clinical presentation, timing of cholecystectomy, operative findings, duration of surgery, difficulty in dissection, intra-operative or postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay and outcome at time of discharge.

Results

The majority of patients in both groups underwent successful LC. Both groups were comparable, with respect to demographic profile, mean duration of surgery, gallbladder adhesions (32% vs 29%), thickened edematous gallbladder (76% vs 71%), difficult dissection (32% vs 29%) and need of conversion to open procedure (16% vs 17%). Both groups were also comparable, with respect to intra-operative complications (8% vs 10%). Post operative recovery was prolonged in case of ABP, in comparison to AC, but was not significant statistically (p >0.05). Total post-operative complications were significantly more in ABP group (p <0.01). Post operative stay (mean days 2.76 vs 2.34), as well as total hospital stay (mean days 7.24 vs 5.15) was significantly prolonged in cases with ABP (p <0.05).

Conclusion

LC can be safely performed during index admission in patients with mild ABP as can be done in cases of AC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. JPN guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: treatment of gallstoneinduced acute pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006;13:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron DR, Goodman AJ. Delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis: re-admission and outcomes. Ann R coll Surg Engl 2004;86:385–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ranson JH. The timing of biliary surgery in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1979;189:654–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Osborne DH, Imrie CW, Carter DC. Biliary surgery in the same admission for gallstone associated acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1981;68:758–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sinha R. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute biliary pancreatitis: the optimal choice? HPB Surg 2008;10:332–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranson JHC. Etiological and prognostic factors in human acute pancreatitis: a review. Am J Gastroenterol 1982;77:633–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon JA, Hillam JD. Surgical treatment of biliary tract disease associated with acute pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1970;120:371–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ong GB, Lam KH, Lim TK, John W. The acute pancreatitis in Hong Kong. Br J Surg 1979;66:398–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horward JM, Ehrlich EW. Gallstone pancreatitis a clinical entity. Surgery 1982;51:177–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bedirli A, Sozuer EM, Sakrak O, Babayigit H, Yilmaz Z. Comparison of the results of early, delayed and elective surgery in biliary pancreatitis. Turk J Gastroenterol 2003;14:97–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly TR, Wagner DS. Gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial of the timing of surgery. Surgery 1988;104:600–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. da Costa DW, Dijksman LM, Bouwense SA, et al. Costeffectiveness of same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy after mild gallstone pancreatitis in the PONCHO trial. Br J Surg 2016;103:1695–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Papachristou GI, Muddana V, Yadav D, et al. Comparison of BISAP, Ranson’s, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:435–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dambrauskas Z, Gulbinas A, Pundzius J, Barauskas G. Value of the different prognostic systems and biological markers for predicting severity and progression of acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010;45:959–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tzovaras G, Zacharoulis D, Liakou P, Theodoropoulos T, Paroutoglou G, Hatzitheofilou C. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective nonrandomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:5528–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang YC, Yang HR, Chung PK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ. Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis: timing does not influence conversion rate. Surg Endosc 2006;20:806–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Fukui T. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today 2005;35:553–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roulin D, Saadi A, Di Mare L, Demartines N, Halkic N. Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis, Are the 72 hours Still the Rule?: A Randomized Trial. Ann Surg 2016;264:717–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stimac D, Krznaric ZI, Radic M, Zuvic-Butorac M. Outcome of the biliary acute pancreatitis is not associated with body mass index. Pancreas 2007;34:165–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Banz V, Gsponer T, Candinas D, Guller U. Population based analysis of 4113 patients with acute cholecystitis defining the optimal time point for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2011;254:964–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu B, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Gong K, Lu Y, Zhang N. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions. N World J Surg 2012;36:2654–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Nixon SJ, Paterson-Brown S. Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early management of acute gallbladder disease. Br J Surg 2005;92:586–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ammori BJ, Davides D, Vezakis A, Larvin M, McMahon MJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Are patients with biliary pancreatitis at increased operative risk? Surg Endosc 2003;17:777–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly T, Elliot DW. The management of gallstone pancreatitis in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1996;172:225–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alimoglu O, Ozkan O, Sahin M, Akcakaya A, Eryilmaz R, Bas G. Timing of cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis: outcomes of cholecystectomy on first admission and after recurrent biliary pancreatitis. World J Surg 2003;27:256–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Falor AE, De-Virgilio C, Stabile BE, et al. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis. Time for a paradigm shift. Arch Surg 2012;147:1031–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor E, Wong C. The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild gallstone pancreatitis. Am Surg 2004;70:971–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Baal MC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. The Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis. A Systematic Review. Ann Surg 2012;255:860–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gonzalez-Rodrıguez FJ, Paredes-Cotore JP, Ponton C, et al. Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? Conclusions of a controlled trial. Hepatogastroenterology 2009;56:11–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Low SW, Iyer SG, Chang SK, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: safe implementation of successful strategies to reduce conversion rates. Surg Endosc 2009;23:2424–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aboulian A, Chan T, Yaghoubian A, et al. Early cholecystectomy safely decreases hospital stay in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis. A randomized prospective study. Ann Surg 2010;251:615–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India

    Sanjay Marwah, Kapil Dev Shivran, Mahavir S. Jangra, Jangvir Singh, Satya Prakash Gupta & Vikram Pal Singh

Authors
  1. Sanjay Marwah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kapil Dev Shivran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahavir S. Jangra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jangvir Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Satya Prakash Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vikram Pal Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Marwah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marwah, S., Shivran, K.D., Jangra, M.S. et al. Comparative evaluation of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis vs acute cholecystitis. Hellenic J Surg 89, 4–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-017-0370-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-017-0370-x

Key words

Search

Navigation