Abstract
Unpredictable rainfall, variations in farm inputs, crop-diseases, and the inherent potential of genotypes are among the major factors for low and variable crop yield. Fourteen elite groundnut genotypes were examined in 14 environments to analyze adaptability and stability of genotypes, and identify mega-environments if they exist. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, cultivar-superiority measure, and genotype plus genotype-by-environment (GGE) biplot analysis were used for data analysis. The environment (69.8%) and genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) effects (21.4%) were dominating the genotypic effect (8.8%). The GEI was significant (P < 0.01), and two distinct environments (mega-environments) were identified, suggesting separate national groundnut breeding strategies for Babile and Pawe. ICGV-94100 and ICGV-97156 were stable and had the highest-yield at Babile and Pawe, respectively. The higher heritability value was recorded in more homogeneous and favorable environments, indicating the genetic potential of groundnut genotypes were better attained in more homogeneous and favorable environments. AMMI model, cultivar-superiority measure, and GGE biplots were helpful methodologies and complemented each other to evaluate the adaptability and stability of groundnut genotypes in diverse environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanche SB, Myers GO, Kang MS. 2007. GGE biplot and traditional stability measures for interpreting genotype by environment interactions. J. Crop Improve. 20: 123–135
Blum A. 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments, CRC Press
Crossa J, Gauch HG Jr, Zobel, RW. 1990. Additive main effect and multiplicative interactions analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Sci. 30: 493–500
CSA, Central Statistical Agency. 2011. Area, production and yield of crops for private peasant holdings for Meher season 2010/2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Dwivedi SL, Crouch JH, Nigam SN, Ferguson ME, Paterson AH. 2003. Molecular breeding of groundnut for enhanced productivity and food security in the semi-arid tropics: opportunities and challenges. Adv. Agron. 80: 153–221
Ebdon JS, Gauch HG Jr. 2002a. Additive main effect and multiplicative interactions analysis of national turf grass performance trials: I. Interpretation of genotype x Environment Interaction. Crop Sci. 42: 489–496
Ebdon JS, Gauch HG Jr. 2002b. Additive main effect and multiplicative interactions analysis of national turf grass performance trials: II. Cultivar Recommendations. Crop Sci. 42: 497–506
Gauch HG. 1988. Model Selection and Validation for Yield Trials with Interaction. Biometrics 44(3): 705–715
Gauch HG, Piepho HP, Annicchiarico P. 2008. Statistical Analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci. 48: 866–889
Gauch HG, Zobel RW. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37: 311–326
Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Noordwijk AJ Van. 1991. Nestling growth in the Great Tit. I. Heritability estimates under different environmental conditions. J. Evol. Biol. 3: 341–362
Kang MS, Aggarwal VD, and Chirwa RM. 2006. Adaptability and stability of bean cultivars as determined via yield-stability statistic and GGE biplot analysis. J. Crop Improv. 15(1): 97–120
Kebede A, Bushra F. 2012. Registration of BaHa-jidu and BaHa-gudo groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties. East Afr. J. Sci. 6(1): 79–80
Kebede A, Tana T. 2014. Genotype by environment interaction and stability of pod yield of elite breeding lines of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in eastern Ethiopia. Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J. 3(2): 43–46
Khalil IA, Rahman H, Rehman NU, Arif, M, Khalil IH, Iqbal M, Ullah H, Afridi, K, Sajjad M, Ishaq M. 2011. Evaluation of maize hybrids for grain yield stability in north-west of Pakistan. Sarhad J. Agriv. 27(2): 213–218
Lin CS, Binns MR. 1988. A superiority performance measure of cultivar performance of cultivar x location data. Canad. J. Plant Sci. 68: 193–198
Nyquist WE, Baker RJ. 1991. Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant populations. Critical Rev. Plant Sci. 10(3): 235–322
Sharma RC, Morgounov AI, Braun HJ, Akin B, Kesser M, Kaya Y, Khalikulov Z, Ginkel MV, VSN International. 2014. GenStat for Windows 17th Edition. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK. Available at http://www.GenStat.co.uk
Yahyaoui A, Rajaram S. 2012. Yield stability analysis of winter wheat genotypes targeted to semi-arid environments in the international winter wheat improvement program. Int. J. Plant Breed. 6(1): 7–13
Yan W, Kang MS. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47: 641–653
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kebede B, A., Getahun, A. Adaptability and stability analysis of groundnut genotypes using AMMI model and GGE-biplot. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 20, 343–349 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-017-0061-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-017-0061-0