Abstract
“Problem-based learning” differs from lecture-based teaching because it centers on problems using scenarios to illustrate previously taught material and takes place within a group, where participants contribute to the learning process at every stage. Furthermore, there is no mention of the teacher, because its leader acts as a facilitator. Between 2011 and 2013, we organized six “chalk and blackboard interactive workshops”. For each workshop, 6–8 medical students, 12–14 pediatricians in training and 2–4 experienced pediatricians met during 2 days to address clinical cases. Each case dealt with using two blackboards according to a simple schedule: (1) two pediatricians in training (alternatively: one student and one pediatrician in training), supported by one experienced pediatrician, present the problem of a child, ask the participants to collect further diagnostic information and to plan the examination (the experienced pediatrician, the pediatrician in training and the medical student had previously pitched a script containing well-defined educational goals); (2) the participants make and justify a diagnostic assessment, suggest and interpret the laboratory tests and finally recommend management; (3) the interpretation of diagnostic studies is also carefully dealt with. The time spent to deepen basic skills is higher than that devoted to diagnostic tests and treatment. Enormous participant gratification and enthusiasm were described by the participants to each workshop. In our opinion, “problem-based learning” and “chalk and blackboard workshop” share common advantages. The major advantage of the “chalk and blackboard workshop” is the inclusion of experienced pediatricians, who concurrently act both as teachers and facilitators.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Obviously, when the diagnosis seems clear-cut—a simple upper respiratory illness or a case of hives, for example—these steps may be superfluous.
References
Clark RV (1994) History and physical examination. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 23:699–707
Unti SM (1994) The critical first year of life. History, physical examination, and general developmental assessment. Pediatr Clin North Am 41:859–873
Schechter GP, Blank LL, Godwin HA Jr, LaCombe MA, Novack DH, Rosse WF (1996) Refocusing on history-taking skills during internal medicine training. Am J Med 101:210–216
Diwan AG, Kulkarni R, Sada E (2012) History taking: still a valuable tool in today’s era of modern medicine. J Assoc Physicians India 60:68
Lara-Torre E (2008) The physical examination in pediatric and adolescent patients. Clin Obstet Gynecol 51:205–213
Outram S, Nair BR (2008) Peer physical examination: time to revisit? Med J Aust 189:274–276
Nishigori H, Masuda K, Kikukawa M, Kawashima A, Yudkowsky R, Bordage G, Otaki J (2011) A model teaching session for the hypothesis-driven physical examination. Med Teach 33:410–414
Easton G, Stratford-Martin J, Atherton H (2012) An appraisal of the literature on teaching physical examination skills. Educ Prim Care 23:246–254
Rozenman Y, Gilon D, Fuchs S (1997) Clinical problem-solving. Where did good old clinical diagnosis go? N Engl J Med 336:1435–1438
Round A (2001) Introduction to clinical reasoning. J Eval Clin Pract 7:109–117
Rencic J (2011) Twelve tips for teaching expertise in clinical reasoning. Med Teach 33:887–892
Collins J (2004) Education techniques for lifelong learning: making a powerpoint presentation. Radiographics 24:1177–1183
Collins J (2004) Education techniques for lifelong learning: giving a powerpoint presentation: the art of communicating effectively. Radiographics 24:1185–1192
Alpert JS (2011) Some simple rules for effective communication in clinical teaching and practice environments. Am J Med 124:381–382
Harden RM (2008) Death by powerpoint—the need for a ‘fidget index’. Med Teach 30:833–835
Volpintesta EJ (2011) The perils of powerpoint. Am J Med 124:e9
Engel CE (1992) Problem-based learning. Br J Hosp Med 48:325–329
Galey WR (1998) What is the future of problem-based learning in medical education? Am J Physiol 275:S13–S15
Mennin S, Gordan P, Majoor G, Osman HA, Network TUFH (2003) Position paper on problem-based learning. Educ Health (Abingdon) 16:98–113
Wood DF (2003) Problem based learning. BMJ 326:328–330
Kilroy DA (2004) Problem based learning. Emerg Med J 21:411–413
Neville AJ (1999) The problem-based learning tutor: Teacher? Facilitator? Evaluator? Med Teach 21:393–401
Koh GC, Khoo HE, Wong ML, Koh D (2008) The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review. CMAJ 178:34–41
Dewey J (1894) The ego as cause. Philos Rev 3:337–341
Mansouri M, Lockyer J (2007) A meta-analysis of continuing medical education effectiveness. J Contin Educ Health Prof 27:6–15
Conflict of interest
None for each and every author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bianchetti, M.G., Bettinelli, A., Fossali, E.F. et al. “Chalk and blackboard interactive 2-day workshop” for pediatricians in training and medical students: preliminary experience. J Med Pers 12, 68–72 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0179-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0179-0