Skip to main content
Log in

The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale for College Students

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Mindful self-care is a way of embodied self-regulation that can safeguard and enhance psychological well-being. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among college students.

Method

A total of 1486 college students (Mage = 19.36, SD = 1.16) from four different universities participated in this study. All participants completed a series of online surveys, including the MSCS, the Self-Compassion Scale–Short Form, the Body Appreciation Scale-2, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the validity of the MSCS, and the R package measureQ was utilized to calculate the reliability. Additionally, we conducted comparative analyses involving the MSCS (33 items), its brief version (Brief-MSCS, 24 items), and previous relevant research.

Results

The MSCS and Brief-MSCS demonstrated an acceptable factor structure, while the Brief-MSCS exhibited a more robust structure. Notably, the bifactor model adequately fitted the data for both versions. In bifactor model, each item not only belonged to its own group of factors but also belonged to a general factor. Both versions displayed satisfactory convergent validity, discriminant validity, concurrent validity, and robust composite reliability. Furthermore, Chinese college students exhibited a higher level of mindful self-care than Chinese medical professionals and a Western community sample.

Conclusions

The MSCS and Brief-MSCS have been found to be reliable and valid tools for assessing the levels of mindful self-care among college students, with the brief version showing superior performance. The robust fit of the bifactor model suggests that there is an overarching structure of mindful self-care that can be used to assess an individual’s level through the total score. Moreover, there are differences in the level of mindful self-care among different groups, which need further verification.

Preregistration

This study is not preregistered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data of the present study is available from the first corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the editors and reviewers of this manuscript for their valuable recommendations, and all the participants in this study for their unselfish assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (22BSH093). The funders did not influence the design of the study, analysis, summarizing of the results, writing the article or decision to submit for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CJ and NM contributed equally to this work. CJ: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation. NM: Investigation, formal analysis. WZ: Writing—reviewing and editing, conceptualization, supervision. XJ: Conceptualization, supervision. JX: Investigation, validation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Zhang or Xu Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This research was approved by the Central China Normal University Institutional Review Board (IRB Number: CCNU-IRB-202303015a) and adhered to the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Electronic informed consent was obtained from each participant before participation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Use of Artificial Intelligence Statement

Artificial intelligence tools were not used in this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ju, C., Mo, N., Zhang, W. et al. The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale for College Students. Mindfulness 15, 616–630 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02308-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02308-7

Keywords

Navigation