Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Reported Trait Mindfulness and Couples’ Relationship Satisfaction: a Meta-Analysis

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

New theoretical perspectives have begun to shift the study of trait mindfulness beyond individual processes to interpersonal romantic relationships. Viability of these pursuits is perhaps contingent on the basic assumption that higher trait mindfulness is associated with beneficial outcomes like relationship satisfaction. Moreover, if this association is not consistent across sample characteristics or if the available knowledge appears tainted by publication bias, then the basic assumption of this emerging research may not be tenable.

Methods

Twenty-eight samples of studies correlating trait mindfulness and relationship satisfaction were collected.

Results

The average effect size was small (.24) and publication bias was not evident. The effect size was consistent across age, gender, marital status, meditation status, and mindfulness dimensionality.

Conclusions

This study supports emerging theoretical perspectives linking trait mindfulness to romantic relationship outcomes. The association between trait mindfulness and relationship satisfaction does not appear sensitive to a publication bias mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

*References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis

  • *Adair, K. C., Boulton, A. J., & Algoe, S. B. (2018). The effect of mindfulness on relationship satisfaction via perceived responsiveness: findings from a dyadic study of heterosexual romantic partners. Mindfulness, 9(2), 597–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Asber, C. E. (2014). Qualities of mindfulness and relationship satisfaction: how mindfulness training in one partner affects a relationship (Doctoral dissertation). Alliant International University.

  • *Atkinson, B. J. (2013). Mindfulness training and the cultivation of secure, satisfying couple relationships. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 2(2), 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (Ed.). (2015). Mindfulness-based treatment approaches: Clinician’s guide to evidence base and applications. Elsevier.

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S. J., Eddy, K. T., Angstadt, M., Nathan, P. J., & Phan, K. L. (2007). Amygdala–frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(4), 303–312.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • *Barnes, S., Brown, K. W., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W. K., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 482–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). Measuring mindfulness: first steps towards the development of a comprehensive mindfulness scale. Mindfulness, 4(1), 18–32.

  • Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettcher, J., Åström, V., Påhlsson, D., Schenström, O., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2014). Internet-based mindfulness treatment for anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 45(2), 241–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.

  • Brotto, L. A., Basson, R., & Luria, M. (2008). A mindfulness-based group psychoeducational intervention targeting sexual arousal disorder in women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5(7), 1646–1659.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., Creswell, J. D., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of mindfulness: Theory, research, and practice. Guilford Publications.

  • *Burpee, L. C., & Langer, E. J. (2005). Mindfulness and marital satisfaction. Journal of Adult Development, 12(1), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31(1), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. W., Carson, K. M., Gil, K. M., & Baucom, D. H. (2004). Mindfulness-based relationship enhancement. Behavior Therapy, 35(3), 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. W., Carson, K. M., Gil, K. M., & Baucom, D. H. (2007). Self-expansion as a mediator of relationship improvements in a mindfulness intervention. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E. C., Schönbrodt, F. D., Gervais, W. M., & Hilgard, J. (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: a comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 115–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1999). Interventions for couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 165–190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the common χ 2 tests. Biometrics, 10(4), 417–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, J. E., Mulrow, C. D., Localio, R., Stack, C. B., Meibohm, A. R., Guallar, E., & Goodman, S. N. (2014). Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change. Annals of Internal Medicine, 160(4), 267–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182-185.

  • Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 665–694.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C., Levine, J. M., Mackie, D. M., Morf, C. C., Sansone, C., Vazire, S., & West, S. G. (2014). Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: recommendations for research and educational practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572-583.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrel, L. E., & Keeling, M. L. (2010). Relational aspects of mindfulness: implications for the practice of marriage and family therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 32(4), 412–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Gambrel, L. E., & Piercy, F. P. (2015). Mindfulness-based relationship education for couples expecting their first child—Part 1: a randomized mixed-methods program evaluation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(1), 5–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillath, O., Bunge, S. A., Shaver, P. R., Wendelken, C., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment-style differences in the ability to suppress negative thoughts: exploring the neural correlates. Neuroimage, 28(4), 835–847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Giolzetti, A. C. (2012). An examination of the relationship between mindfulness and love (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology.

  • Goodall, K., Trejnowska, A., & Darling, S. (2012). The relationship between dispositional mindfulness, attachment security and emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 622–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, J., & Knapp, G. (2001). On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses. Statistics in Medicine, 20(12), 1771–1782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V. (1984). Advances in statistical methods for meta-analysis. New Directions for Evaluation, 1984(24), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Lunstad, J., Birmingham, W., & Jones, B. Q. (2008). Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 239–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Horst, K. C. (2013). Trait mindfulness as a predictive factor for intimate partner violence perpetration among young adults (Doctoral dissertation). Kansas State University.

  • *Jones, K. C., Welton, S. R., Oliver, T. C., & Thoburn, J. W. (2011). Mindfulness, spousal attachment, and marital satisfaction: a mediated model. The Family Journal, 19(4), 357–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: The program of the stress reduction clinic at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center. Delacorte Press.

  • *Kappen, G., Karremans, J. C., Burk, W. J., & Buyukcan-Tetik, A. (2018). On the association between mindfulness and romantic relationship satisfaction: the role of partner acceptance. Mindfulness, 9(5), 1543–1556.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Karremans, J. C., Schellekens, M. P., & Kappen, G. (2017). Bridging the sciences of mindfulness and romantic relationships: A theoretical model and research agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(1), 29-49.

  • *Khaddouma, A., & Gordon, K. C. (2018). Mindfulness and young adult dating relationship stability: a longitudinal path analysis. Mindfulness, 9(5), 1529–1542.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Khaddouma, A., Gordon, K. C., & Bolden, J. (2015a). Zen and the art of dating: mindfulness, differentiation of self, and satisfaction in dating relationships. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 4(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Khaddouma, A., Gordon, K. C., & Bolden, J. (2015b). Zen and the art of sex: examining associations among mindfulness, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction in dating relationships. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 30(2), 268–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

  • Kozlowski, A. (2013). Mindful mating: Exploring the connection between mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 28(1–2), 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Krafft, J., Haeger, J., & Levin, M. E. (2017). The interaction of mindful awareness and acceptance in couples satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, H., Laurent, S., Hertz, R., Egan-Wright, D., & Granger, D. A. (2013). Sex-specific effects of mindfulness on romantic partners’ cortisol responses to conflict and relations with psychological adjustment. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(12), 2905–2913.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Lenger, K. A., Gordon, C. L., & Nguyen, S. P. (2017). Intra-individual and cross-partner associations between the five facets of mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Mindfulness, 8(1), 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundblad, A. M., & Hansson, K. (2006). Couples therapy: effectiveness of treatment and long-term follow-up. Journal of Family Therapy, 28(2), 136–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Maniaci, M. R. (2015). For better, for worse: discrepancies between implicit and explicit evaluations in newlywed marriage (Doctoral dissertation). University of Rochester.

  • McClelland, S. I. (2011). Who is the “self” in self reports of sexual satisfaction? Research and policy implications. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 8(4), 304–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, J., Adler-Baeder, F., & Rodriguez, P. (2016). Mindfully in love: a meta-analysis of the association between mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 4(1), 89–101.

  • McShane, B. B., Böckenholt, U., & Hansen, K. T. (2016). Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis: an evaluation of selection methods and some cautionary notes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 730–749.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Michaels, J. B. (2007). Mindfulness training and relationship satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation). Pacific Graduate School of Psychology.

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 56–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nhat Hanh, T. (1975). The miracle of mindfulness. Beacon Press.

  • *Ormiston, A. E. (2011). The role of attachment security and mindfulness in relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship conflict (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Database (Accession No. 875560394)).

  • *Pakenham, K. I., & Samios, C. (2013). Couples coping with multiple sclerosis: a dyadic perspective on the roles of mindfulness and acceptance. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 36(4), 389–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Parent, J., Clifton, J., Forehand, R., Golub, A., Reid, M., & Pichler, E. R. (2014). Parental mindfulness and dyadic relationship quality in low-income cohabiting Black stepfamilies: associations with parenting experienced by adolescents. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3(2), 67–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pepping, C. A., Davis, P. J., & O’Donovan, A. (2013). Individual differences in attachment and dispositional mindfulness: the mediating role of emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 453–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, M., Langer, E. J., Bodner, T., & Zilcha-Mano, S. (2012). The development and validation of the Langer mindfulness scale-enabling a socio-cognitive perspective of mindfulness in organizational contexts. Fordham University Schools of Business Research Paper.

  • Quinn-Nilas, C. (2019). Relationship and sexual satisfaction: a developmental perspective on bidirectionality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519876018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Brown, K. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). How integrative is attachment theory? Unpacking the meaning and significance of felt security. Psychological Inquiry, 18(3), 177–182.

  • *Saavedra, M. C., Chapman, K. E., & Rogge, R. D. (2010). Clarifying links between attachment and relationship quality: Hostile conflict and mindfulness as moderators. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 380–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: a new approach to preventing relapse. Guilford Press.

  • Shadish, W. R., & Baldwin, S. A. (2003). Meta-analysis of MFT interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29(4), 547–570.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P. R., Lavy, S., Saron, C. D., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Social foundations of the capacity for mindfulness: an attachment perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 264–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. J. (2007). The mindful brain: Reflection and attunement in the cultivation of well-being. WW Norton & Company.

  • Siegling, A. B., & Petrides, K. V. (2014). Measures of trait mindfulness: convergent validity, shared dimensionality, and linkages to the five-factor model. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1164.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • *Smith, A. R. (2015). Mindfulness and marital satisfaction: direct and indirect effects (Doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University.

  • Spanier, G. B. (1987). Dyadic adjustment scale. In R. Sherman & N. Fredman (Eds.), Handbook of measurement for marriage and family therapy (pp. 52–58). Routledge.

  • Van Dam, N. T., Earleywine, M., & Borders, A. (2010). Measuring mindfulness? An item response theory analysis of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 805–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vevea, J. L., & Woods, C. M. (2005). Publication bias in research synthesis: sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 428–443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viechtbauer W, (2005) Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(3), 261–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48 http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wachs, K., & Cordova, J. V. (2007). Mindful relating: exploring mindfulness and emotion repertoires in intimate relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 464–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. A. (2004). The seven-point mind training. Snow Lion Publications.

  • Walsh, R., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). The meeting of meditative disciplines and Western psychology: a mutually enriching dialogue. American Psychologist, 61(3), 227–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Wiggins, K. T. (2012). Mindfulness and emotion in relationships: emotion regulation, empathy, and affect as mediators of the association between mindfulness and relationship satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation). The University of New Mexico.

  • *Williams, A. M., & Cano, A. (2014). Spousal mindfulness and social support in couples with chronic pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 30(6), 528–535.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, N. D., Crane, D. R., Schaalje, G. B., & Law, D. D. (2005). What works for whom: a meta-analytic review of marital and couples therapy in reference to marital distress. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 33(4), 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Zamir, O., Gewirtz, A. H., & Zhang, N. (2017). Actor–partner associations of mindfulness and marital quality after military deployment. Family Relations, 66(3), 412–424.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Christopher Quinn-Nilas was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Doctoral Fellowship (752-2015-1326).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, The University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada

    Christopher Quinn-Nilas

Authors
  1. Christopher Quinn-Nilas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Quinn-Nilas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quinn-Nilas, C. Self-Reported Trait Mindfulness and Couples’ Relationship Satisfaction: a Meta-Analysis. Mindfulness 11, 835–848 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01303-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01303-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation