Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A field demonstration of groundwater vulnerability assessment using transport modeling and groundwater age modeling, Beijing Plain, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater vulnerability is often regarded as the resistance of aquifers to pollutions, which is in fact the groundwater environment vulnerability. Similarly the renewable capacity of groundwater system can be regarded as the indicator for groundwater resources vulnerability. In this paper, the concept of groundwater vulnerability is extended to include both the groundwater environment vulnerability and groundwater resources vulnerability, and the extended overall groundwater vulnerability is assessed by examining the solute transport process from ground surface to the water table (for groundwater environment vulnerability), and evaluating the renewable capacity of groundwater system (for groundwater resources vulnerability). For this case study in Beijing Plain, a 1D-modeling, 2D-mapping model is constructed in HYDRUS to simulate the solute transport process through vadose zone. The transit times and solute concentrations at the water table are selected as the indicators for groundwater environment vulnerability. Meanwhile, a 3D groundwater age model in MODFLOW/MT3DMS is employed to model the age distribution in saturated zone, and the modeled ages are taken as the indicators for groundwater resources vulnerability. These two models are coupled together by exchanging their vertical infiltrations and water table elevations. Overall vulnerability is finally assessed by taking all the indicators into account. The result suggests the overall vulnerability can finely represent the synthetic impact of solute transport characteristics (groundwater environment vulnerability in vadose zone) and groundwater system renewability (groundwater resources vulnerability in saturated zone). The most vulnerable regions of Beijing Plain are mostly in agricultural areas, the medium vulnerable areas mostly appear at pumping sites, and the least vulnerable areas are mostly distributed in recharge regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acutis M, Donatelli M (2003) SOILPAR 2.00: software to estimate soil hydrological parameters and functions. Eur J Agron 18(3–4):373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G. (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. EPA/600/2–87/035. US Environmental Protection Agency, USA

  • Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media, Hydrology Paper. No. 3, Colorado State University, Fort Collins

  • Cao GL, Zheng CM, Scanlon BR, Liu J, Li WP (2013) Use of flow modeling to assess sustainability of groundwater resources in the North China Plain. Water Resour Res 49(1):159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civita M, Maio MD (1997) SINTACS: Un sistema parametrico per la valutazione e la cartografia della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi all’inquinamento. Metodologia and automatizzazione, Pitagora Editrice, Bologna 1997:191

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong YH, Xu HZ, Li GM (2013) Wellhead protection area delineation using multiple methods: a case study in Beijing. Environ Earth Sci 70(1):481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan YH, Tao S, Li BG (2004) Spatial and temporal variation of reference crop evapotranspiration in Beijing. Chin Agric Meteorol. 25(2):22–25 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Durner W (1994) Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure. Water Resour Res 32(9):211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson T, VanderSteen J, Sophocleous MA, Taniguchi M, Alley WM, Allen DM, Zhou YX (2010) Groundwater sustainability strategies. Nat Geosci 3:378–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque MA, Burgess WG (2012) 14C dating of deep groundwater in the Bengal Aquifer System, Bangladesh: implications for aquifer anisotropy, recharge sources and sustainability. J Hydrol 444–445(11):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmak S, Haman DZ (2007) Evapotranspiration: Potential or Reference? Electronic Data Information Source: ABE 343. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, US

  • Li HL, Boufadel MC, Weaver JW (2008) Tide-induced seawater–groundwater circulation in shallow beach aquifers. J Hydrol 352(1–2):211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margat J (1968) Groundwater vulnerability to contamination. (doc) 68 SGC 198 HYD, BRGM, Orleans, France

  • Neukum C, Azzam R (2009) Quantitative assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability to contamination using numerical simulations. Sci Total Environ 408(2):245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford W (2011) Calibration of models using groundwater age. Hydrogeol J 19:13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon B, Faunt CC, Longuevergne L, Reedy RC, Alley WM, McGuire VL, McMahon PB (2012) Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. PNAS 109(24):9320–9325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi XZ, Yu DS, Warner ED, Pan XZ, Petersen GW, Gong ZG, Weindorf DC (2004) Soil Database of 1:1,000,000 digital soil survey and reference system of the Chinese genetic soil classification system. Soil Surv Horizons 45:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Simunek J, Sejna M, Saito H, Sakai M, Genuchten MTV (2009) The HYDRUS-1D Software Package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, California

  • Stempvoort VD, Evert L, Wassenaar L (1993) Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can Water Res J 18(1):25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun F, Shao HB, Wang WQ, Watanabe N, Bilke L, Yang ZS, Huang ZF, Kolditz O (2012) Groundwater deterioration in Nankou-a suburban area of Beijing: data assessment and remediation scenarios. Environ Earth Sci 67(6):1573–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SX (2013) Hydrochemical and isotopic characteristics of groundwater in the Yanqi Basin of Xinjiang province, northwest China. Environ Earth Sci 71(1):427–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei GX, Chen FH, Ma JZ, Dong Y, Zhu GF, Edmunds WM (2014) Groundwater recharge and evolution of water quality in China’s Jilantai Basin based on hydrogeochemical and isotopic evidence. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3257-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Li GM, Dong YH, Li M, Yang JQ, Zhou D, Yang ZS, Zheng FD (2012) Influence of south to north water transfer on groundwater dynamic change in Beijing plain. Environ Earth Sci 65(4):1323–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Yao YY, Hayes G, Zhang BX, Zheng CM (2010) Quantitative assessment of groundwater vulnerability using index system and transport simulation, Huangshuihe catchment, China. Sci Total Environ 408(24):6108–6116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai YZ, Wang JS, Teng YG, Zuo R (2013) Hydrogeochemical and isotopic evidence of groundwater evolution and recharge in aquifers in Beijing Plain, China. Environ Earth Sci 69(7):2167–2177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 51409028), and the innovation team building program for universities in Chongqing (No. KJTD201305).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, China

    Cheng Yu

  2. Center for Water Research, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Cheng Yu, Yingying Yao, Guoliang Cao & Chunmiao Zheng

  3. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA

    Chunmiao Zheng

Authors
  1. Cheng Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yingying Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guoliang Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chunmiao Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, C., Yao, Y., Cao, G. et al. A field demonstration of groundwater vulnerability assessment using transport modeling and groundwater age modeling, Beijing Plain, China. Environ Earth Sci 73, 5245–5253 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3769-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3769-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation