Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anaesthesia in Maxillofacial Soft Tissue Injuries: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims and Objectives

Dexmedetomidine is a relatively new, potent, and highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist used for perioperative sympatholytic, analgesia, and sedation. We conducted this study to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to local anaesthesia for maxillofacial soft tissue injuries as day care in the emergency department on patient hemodynamics and analgesic efficacy.

Materials and Methods

Eighty patients gave informed consent to participate in the study. They were divided into Groups P and D, each of which consisted of 40 participants. Patients received saline injections in Group P, and Group D received dexmedetomidine (DEX) with local anaesthesia infiltration to both groups. Hemodynamic parameters, duration of surgery, pain of first rescue analgesia, Pain score, patient satisfaction, and surgeons satisfaction were recorded and quantified using unpaired t tests or Mann–Whitney and ANOVA tests. Data and qualitative data parameters were compared using Chi-square test. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Our study showed statistically significant reduced heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressures in DEX compared to the placebo group where none had hypotension or bradycardia in clinical settings. The dexmedetomidine group had shorter operative time and decreased need for analgesia due to lower VAS scores. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were superior in the DEX group compared to the other groups.

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine effectively suppresses the hemodynamic stress response during minor surgical procedures. We conclude that dexmedetomidine is an effective medication to be used in the emergency room for day-care procedures, as a potent analgesic, anxiolytic providing hemodynamically stable patients, with minimal side effects. We summarise that considering the above properties of dexmedetomidine can be incorporated into ERAS (early return after surgery) protocol, making it an optimal drug of choice as an alternative to moderate sedative drugs, in managing soft tissue injuries of maxillofacial region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kretlow JD, McKnight AJ, Izaddoost SA (2010) Facial soft tissue trauma. Semin Plast Surg 24(4):348–356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Aveta A, Casati P (2008) Soft tissue injuries of the face: early aesthetic reconstruction in polytrauma patients. Ann Ital Chir 79(6):415–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Etemadi Sh M, Kaviani N, Salimian K, Tajmiri G (2022) Effect of dexmedetomidine added to lidocaine cartridge on the level of patient sedation, cooperation, and patient and surgeon satisfaction during mandibular third-molar extraction surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Int J Dent 2:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4722674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mishra N, Birmiwal KG, Pani N, Raut S, Sharma G, Rath KC (2016) Sedation in oral and maxillofacial day care surgery: a comparative study between intravenous dexmedetomidine and midazolam. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 7(2):178–185

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ustün Y, Gündüz M, Erdoğan O, Benlidayi ME (2006) Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in outpatient third molar surgery yakup. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(9):1353–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gertler R, Brown HC, Mitchell DH, Silvius EN (2001) Dexmedetomidine: a novel sedative-analgesic agent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 14(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2001.11927725. (PMID: 16369581; PMCID: PMC1291306)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singaram M, Udhayakumar RK (2016) Prevalence, pattern, etiology, and management of maxillofacial trauma in a developing country: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(4):174–181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department (2023) Policy statement by the American College of Emergency Physicians, pp 1–2

  9. Bakshi SG, Paulin SV, Bhawalkar P (2020) A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the peri-operative role of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion in robotic-assisted laparoscopic oncosurgeries. Indian J Anaesth 64(9):784–789. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_664_20. (Epub 2020 Sep 1. PMID: 33162573; PMCID: PMC7641074)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wusiman P, Maimaitituerxun B, Saimaiti A, Moming A (2020) Epidemiology and pattern of oral and maxillofacial trauma. J Craniofac Surg 31(5):e517–e520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shepherd JP, Shapland M, Pearce NX, Scully C et al (1990) Pattern, severity and aetiology of injuries in victims of assault. J R Soc Med 83(2):75–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan TU, Rahat S, Khan ZA, Shahid L, Banouri SS et al (2022) Etiology and pattern of maxillofacial trauma. J PLoS ONE 17(9):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gursoytrak B, Kocaturk O, Koparal M, Gulsun B (2019) Assessment of effect of submucosal injection of dexmedetomidine on postoperative symptoms. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 78(3):366–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fasil F, Saundattikar G, Jawale RH (2022) Study of hemodynamic effects of preoperative single-bolus dexmedetomidine in elective laparoscopic surgeries. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 13(1):85–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fritsch G, Danninger T, Allerberger K, Tsodikov A, Felder TK, Kapeller M et al (2014) Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine extends the duration of interscalene brachial plexus blocks for elective shoulder surgery when compared with ropivacaine alone: a single-center, prospective, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 39(1):37–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raghu R, Indira P, Swetha A (2019) Effects of preoperative single bolus dose of dexmedetomidine on perioperative hemodynamics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Clin Anaesth 6(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar S, Kushwaha B, Prakash R et al (2014) Comparative study of effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine premedication in perioperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Internet J Anesthesiol 33(1):600–606

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gadve VR, Shenoi R, Vats V, Shrivastava A (2018) Evaluation of anxiety, pain, and hemodynamic changes during surgical removal of lower third molar under local anesthesia. Ann Maxillofac Surg 8(2):247–253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Schäfers M, Geis C, Svensson CI, Luo ZD, Sommer C (2003) Selective increase of tumour necrosis factor-alpha in injured and spared myelinated primary afferents after chronic constrictive injury of rat sciatic nerve. Eur J Neurosci 17(4):791–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koch A, Zacharowski K, Boehm O et al (2007) Nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines correlate with pain intensity in chronic pain patients. Inflamm Res 56:32–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li S, Yang Y, Yu C, Yao Y, Wu Y, Qian L, Cheung CW (2015) Dexmedetomidine analgesia effects in patients undergoing dental implant surgery and its impact on postoperative inflammatory and oxidative stress. Oxid Med Cell Longev. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/186736

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhanot E, Tilvawala K, Shah V (2015) A comparative study of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for intravenous sedation in dental procedures. Indian J Appl Res 5(10):221–224

    Google Scholar 

  23. Venn RM, Hell J, Grounds RM (2000) Respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in the surgical patient requiring intensive care. Crit Care 4(5):302–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Garip L, Verbist J, Stragier H, Meyns J, Mesotten D, Vundelinckx J (2022) A comparative study of patient satisfaction about anesthesia with dexmedetomidine for ambulatory dental surgery. BMC Res Notes 15(1):376–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Perrott JL, Co MT, Reynolds SC, Gunning DJ (2012) Dexmedetomidine as a procedural sedative for percutaneous tracheotomy: case report and systematic literature review. Case Rep Crit Care. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/659415

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Elsawy A (2021) Dexmedetomidine is an excellent additive to local anaesthesia for postoperative analgesia in bilateral third Molar teeth extraction surgery. Al-Azhar Int Med J. https://doi.org/10.21608/aimj.2021.66816.1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang L, Zhou Y, Zhang T, Huang L, Peng W (2020) Comparison in sedative effects between dexmedetomidine and midazolam in dental implantation: a randomised clinical trial. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7082597

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

UH helped in conception and design of the work, literature search, interpretation of data, data analysis, manuscript editing. CS contributed to data collection, revising it critically for important intellectual content. AS was involved in final approval of the version to be published. AMK drafted the article. SSJ prepared the manuscript. AI analysed the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Hemavathi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hemavathi, U., Sreekanth, C., Shetty, A. et al. Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anaesthesia in Maxillofacial Soft Tissue Injuries: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02122-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02122-7

Keywords

Navigation