Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retrospective Analysis of Subtarsal Incision in Maxillofacial Trauma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Subciliary, subtarsal and infraorbital incisions are the conventional cutaneous approaches to infraorbital rim and floor.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was developed with 30 patients reviewed over a period of 12 months.

Result

No cases showed ectropion in minimum 12-month follow-up. Mild scleral show was present in 3 cases. At the end of 12 months, scar was invisible in 25 patients, mild in 4 patients and moderate in 1 patient who developed wound infection.

Conclusion

Subtarsal incision shows good result with very minimal post-operative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kushner GM (2006) Surgical approaches to the infraorbital rim and orbital floor: the case for the transconjunctival approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:108–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marzola C (2008) Fundamentos de cirurgia buco maxilo facial, vol 6. Ed. Bigforms, Bauru

    Google Scholar 

  3. Subramanian B (2009) Comparison of various approaches for exposure of infraorbital rim fractures of zygoma. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 8(2):99–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bassichis BA et al (2007) Lower-lid blepharoplasty. Oper Tech Otolaryngol 18:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baqain ZH et al (2008) Subtarsal approach for orbital floor repair: a long-term follow-up of 12 cases in a Jordanian Teaching Hospital. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rohrich RJ et al (2003) Subciliary versus subtarsal approaches to orbitozygomatic fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1708–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson S et al (2006) Surgical approaches to the infraorbital rim and orbital floor: the case for the subtarsal approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:104–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feldman EM (2011) The subtarsal incision: where should it be placed? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:2419–2423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sullivan T (1990) Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil 11:256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baryza MJ et al (1995) The Vancouver scar scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil 16:535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Draaijers L et al (1960) The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2004

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fearmonti R et al (2010) A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty 10:e43

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nedelec B et al (2008) Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity. J Burn Care Res 29:501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roques C et al (2007) A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 6:249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Converse JM (1981) A ramdomised comparison of four incision for orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis E III et al (1985) An analysis of 2,067 cases of zygomatico-orbital fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Werther JR (1998) Cutaneous approaches to the lower lid and orbit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:60–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Holtman B et al (1981) A randomized comparison of four incisions for orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Melo Crosara J et al (2009) Comparison of cutaneous incisions to approach the infraorbital rim and orbital floor. Braz J Oral Sci 8(2):88–91

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bahr W et al (1992) Comparison of transcutaneous incisions used for exposure of the infraorbital rim and orbital floor: a retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ridgway EB et al (2009) The incidence of lower eyelid malposition after facial fracture repair: a retrospective study and meta-analysis comparing subtarsal, subciliary, and transconjunctival incisions. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kunal Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was undertaken in conformity with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahajan, R.K., Gupta, K., Srinivasan, K. et al. Retrospective Analysis of Subtarsal Incision in Maxillofacial Trauma. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 19, 443–446 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01302-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01302-0

Keywords

Navigation