Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Body composition assessment and nutritional status evaluation in men and women Portuguese centenarians

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

To assess body composition, nutritional status and its differences between genders in a sample of Portuguese centenarians.

Design

Observational cross-sectional study.

Setting

Centenarians recruited in Portugal, able to give informed consent.

Participants

A total of 252 subjects, with a median age of 100 years, mostly women (77.8%) who accepted to participate in the study, during the period of 2012 to 2014.

Measurements

Anthropometric data collected (weight, height, BMI, waist circumference, hip and waist/hip ratio) were evaluated according to WHO criteria. A portable tetrapolar bioimpedance analyzer was used to calculate body composition and to assess resting metabolism. Nutritional status was evaluated according to three different criteria: BMI, waist circumference and body fat percentage using anthropometric equations and bioimpedance.

Results

We observed an overall mean weight of 51.02±11.03Kg, height of 1.55±0.07m and a BMI of 21.07±3.69Kg/m2. For most of the evaluated parameters, we found substantial differences between genders. The prevalence of underweight and overweight were 25.3% and 13.3%, respectively. Only 5 subjects were obese. Overweight subjects were mostly men (W=10.6% vs. M=22.6%), whereas women were more underweight (W=28.7% vs. M=13.2%). When considering the waist circumference, 26.5% were above the cut-off value. Most of centenarians (72.9%) had a healthy level of visceral fat. This measurement was highly correlated with waist circumference (r= 0.687, p<0.001). The mean of body fat mass was 10.69±6.50Kg, fat-free mass 40.87±7.60Kg and total body water 27.54±6.25Kg. According to body fat mass criteria assessed by bioimpedance, the prevalence of obesity in study population was 6.0% with no gender differences (p = 0.225). Obesity prevalence using anthropometric equations was higher (Deurenberg: 77.7% and Gallagher: 42.8%) than the obtained value by bioimpedance analysis, although according to Bland-Altman analysis both equations showed a good agreement (Deurenberg: 95.8% and Gallagher: 97%) with bioimpedance method. The prevalence of hypohydration (12.9%) was tendentiously higher in women compared to men (W= 15.4% vs. M= 5.0%, p=0.087). Despite the frequency of osteoporosis was higher in women (W = 71.85% vs. M = 28.15%), 95% of men revealed criteria for osteoporosis. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was significantly different between genders using bioimpedance analysis (W= 1123.33± 173.91; M= 1350.10± 188.88; p<0.001) or Harris Benedict equation (W= 934.92± 102.60; M= 1018.85± 171.68; p=0.001). Bland- Altman analysis between methods indicate that there was an agreement of 97.6%. The overall mean metabolic age obtained was 83.52±1.11 years, well below the chronologic age (p<0.001).

Conclusions

In Portuguese centenarians, clinical and nutritional approach should be improved on the gender basis. In relation to nutritional status, centenarians were more frequently underweight than overweight. The thinness could be a natural process, contributing for the longevity being rather overweight a reducing factor in life expectancy. BMI and waist circumference showed a good correlation with body fat percentage. Despite the results of Bland- Altman analysis, Deurenberg and Gallagher equations are not suitable to evaluate obesity prevalence in centenarians. Harris Benedict equation seems to be a good option to measure RMR in centenaries, when BIA is not available. Body composition and nutritional characterization of Portuguese centenarians are relevant contribution in scientific evidence production for the action plan of healthy ageing in Europe (2012–2020) and also for clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. INE. Projecções de População Residente em Portugal, 2008–2060. Instituto. INE, editor. Lisboa; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rochon PA, Gruneir A, Wu W, Gill SS, Bronskill SE, Seitz DP, et al. Demographic Characteristics and Healthcare Use of Centenarians: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 62:86–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. INE. Censos 2011 Resultados Definitivos- Portugal. Instituto Nacional de Estatística IP, editor. Lisboa; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Snead DB, Birge SJ, Kohrt WM. Age-related differences in body composition by hydrodensitometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74(2):770–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts SB, Ss PFC, Evans WJ, Heyman MB, Young VR. Energy Expenditure, Aging and Body Composition. J Nutr. 1993;123:474–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Henry C. Mechanisms of changes in basal metabolism during ageing. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jun;54:S77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kyle UG, Genton L, Hans D, Karsegard L, Slosman DO, Pichard C. Age-related differences in fat-free mass, skeletal muscle, body cell mass and fat mass between 18 and 94 years. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001;55:663–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed T, Haboubi N. Assessment and management of nutrition in older people and its importance to health. Clin Interv Aging 2010;5:207–16.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frontera WR, Hughes VA, Lutz KJ, Evans WJ. A cross-sectional study of muscle strength and mass in 45- to 78-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71(2):644–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Poehlman ET. Regulation of energy expenditure in aging humans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41(5):552–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Going S, Williams D, Lohman T. Aging and body composition: biological changes and methodological issues. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1995;23:411–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chumlea W, Baumgartner N. Status of anthropometry and body composition data in elderly subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50:1158–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paolisso G, Gambardella A, Balbi V, Ammendola S, D´Amore A, Varricchio M. Body composition, body fat distribution, and resting metabolic rate in healthy centenarians. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;62:746–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rech CR, Cordeiro BA, Petroski EL, Vasconcelos Fa G. Validation of bioelectrical impedance for the prediction of fat-free mass in Brazilian elderly subjects. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2008;52(7):1163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Román MC, Ruiz IR, Rico de Cos S, Bellido MC. Análisis de la composición corporal por parámetros antropométricos y bioeléctricos. An Pediatría 2004;61(1):23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:2191–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lohman, T G; Roche, A F; Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Illinois: Human Kinetics Books; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. WHO. Waist circumference and waist–hip ratio: report of a WHO expert consultation, Geneva, 8–11 December 2008. Geneve; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  19. WHO Technical Report Series. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation. Geneve; 2000 p. 1–253.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign I: HKB, editor. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Books; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Kooy K, Seidell JC. Techniques for the measurement of visceral fat: a practical guide. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993;17:187–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. WHO Expert Committee. Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry. Geneve: WHO Technical Report Series; 1995. p. 854–452.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tanita Corporation. Body composition analyser BC-420MA. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(5):1226–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris J, Benedict F. A Biometric Study of Human Basal Metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1918;4(12):370–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;307–10.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Deurenberg P1, Yap M van SW. Body mass index and percent body fat: a meta analysis among different ethnic groups. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22(12):1164–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Deurenberg P, Weststrate Ja., Seidell JC. Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas. Br J Nutr. 1991;65(02):105–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB. How Useful Is Body Mass Index for Comparison of Body Fatness across Age, Sex, and Ethnic Groups? Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(3):228–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shirreffs SM. Markers of hydration status. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(Suppl 2):56–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tanita Body Weight Science Institute. Understanding your measurements. [Internet] Tanita Body Weight Science Institute.

  32. Magnolfi SU, Noferi I, Petruzzi E, Pinzani P, Malentacchi F, Pazzagli M, et al. Centenarians in Tuscany: The role of the environmental factors. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;48(2):263–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bender R, Jöckel KH, Trautner C, Spraul M, Berger M. Effect of age on excess mortality in obesity. JAMA 1999;281(16):1498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dent M, Swanston D. Briefing Note: Obesity and life expectancy. National Obesity Observatory, editor. National Obesity Observatory. UK: Solutions for Public Health; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, Westfall AO, Allison DB. Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA 2003;289(2):187–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hatton TJ. How have Europeans grown so tall? Oxf Econ Pap. 2013;1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Paolisso G, Manzella D, Barbieri M, Rizzo MR, Gambardella A, Varricchio M. Baseline heart rate variability in healthy centenarians: differences compared with aged subjects (>75 years old). Clin Sci (Lond) 1999;97(5):579–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Buffa R, Floris G, Lodde M, Cotza M, Marini E. Nutritional status in the healthy longeval population from Sardinia (Italy). J Nutr Health Aging 2010;14(2):97–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Winter JE, MacInnis RJ, Wattanapenpaiboon N, Nowson CA. BMI and all-cause mortality in older adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(4):875–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. De Hollander EL, Bemelmans WJ, Boshuizen HC, Friedrich N, Wallaschofski H, Guallar-castillón P, et al. The association between waist circumference and risk of mortality considering body mass index in 65- to 74-year-olds: A meta-analysis of 29 cohorts involving more than 58 000 elderly persons. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:805–17.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Paolisso G, Barbieri M, Bonafè M, Franceschi C. Metabolic age modelling: the lesson from centenarians. Eur J Clin Invest. 2000;30(10):888–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Barzilai N, Gupta G. Revisiting the role of fat mass in the life extension induced by caloric restriction. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54(3):B89–96; discussion B97–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lemieux S, Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Després JP. A single threshold value of waist girth identifies normal-weight and overweight subjects with excess visceral adipose tissue. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64(5):685–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Han TS, van Leer EM, Seidell JC, Lean ME. Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sample. BMJ. 1995;311(7017):1401–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Huffman DM, Barzilai N. Role of visceral adipose tissue in aging. Biochim Biophys Acta. Elsevier B.V. 2009;1790(10):1117–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Clasey JL, Bouchard C, Teates CD, Riblett JE, Thorner MO, Hartman ML, et al. The use of anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures to estimate total abdominal and abdominal visceral fat in men and women. Obes Res. 1999;7(3):256–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dobbelsteyn CJ, Flowerdew G, Canadian T, Health H. A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors. The Canadian Heart Health Surveys. 2001;652–61.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Huxley R, Mendis S, Zheleznyakov E, Reddy S, Chan J. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist:hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular risk—a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:16–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Steen B. Body composition and aging. Nutr Rev. 1988;46(2):45–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Forbes GB. Human Body Composition. New York: Springer Verlag; 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Roubenoff R. Sarcopenia and its implications for the elderly. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54 Suppl 3:S40–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Barreto PDS, Demougeot L, Vellas B, Rolland Y. How much exercise are older adults living in nursing homes doing in daily life? A cross-sectional study. J Sports Sci. 2015; 33:116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Roubenoff R. The Pathophysiology of Wasting in the Elderly. J Nutr. 1999;129:256–9.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Evans WJ, Paolisso G, Abbatecola AM, Corsonello A, Bustacchini S, Strollo F, et al. Frailty and muscle metabolism dysregulation in the elderly. Biogerontology 2010;11:527–36.

  55. Bales CW, Ritchie CS. Sarcopenia, weight loss, and nutritional frailty in the elderly. Annu Rev Nutr. 2002;22:309–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Barbieri M, Gambardella A, Paolisso G, Varricchio M. Metabolic aspects of the extreme longevity. Exp Gerontol. 2008;43(2):74–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Berghaus, Sabine; Müller, Dirk; Gandjour, Afschin; Civello, Daniele; Stock S. Osteoporosis in German men: a cost-of-illness study. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;11:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bor A, Matuz M, Gyimesi N, Biczók Z, Soós G, Doró P. Gender inequalities in the treatment of osteoporosis. Maturitas. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2014;80(2):162–9.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Buchholza C, Rafii M, Pencharz PB. Is resting metabolic rate different between men and women? Br J Nutr. 2001;86:641–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rodrigues RAS, Espinosa MM, Melo CD, Perracini MR, Fett WCR, Fett CA. New values anthropometry for classification of nutritional status in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18(7):655–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wham CA., Redwood KM, Kerse N. Validation of the nutrition screening tool “Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition, version II” among octogenarians. J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18(1):39–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alameda Primary Care Health Center, Lisbon, Portugal

    Alda Pereira da Silva

  2. Genetics Laboratory, Environmental Health Institute, ISAMB, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal, Av. Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal

    Alda Pereira da Silva, A. Matos, A. Valente, Â. Gil, I. Alonso, R. Ribeiro & M. Bicho

  3. Universitary Geriatric Unit of Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    Alda Pereira da Silva & J. Gorjão-Clara

  4. Academic Medical Center of Lisbon - North of Lisbon Hospital Center, Lisbon, Portugal

    Alda Pereira da Silva & J. Gorjão-Clara

  5. Department of Nutritional Science, Atlantica University, Barcarena, Portugal

    A. Valente

  6. Instituto Rocha Cabral, Lisbon, Portugal

    Â. Gil & M. Bicho

  7. Nutrition division St Louis Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal

    I. Alonso

  8. Molecular Oncology Group, Portuguese Institute of Oncology Porto Centre, Porto, Portugal

    R. Ribeiro

Authors
  1. Alda Pereira da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Matos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Valente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Â. Gil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Bicho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. Gorjão-Clara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alda Pereira da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pereira da Silva, A., Matos, A., Valente, A. et al. Body composition assessment and nutritional status evaluation in men and women Portuguese centenarians. J Nutr Health Aging 20, 256–266 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0566-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0566-0

Key words

Search

Navigation