Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Successful Business Model Types of Cloud Providers

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The acceleration of technical change in the fast moving electronics market increases the uncertainty and risk for IT providers. Influenced by new IT provisioning concepts such as cloud computing, providers are looking to identify stable guidelines and success factors within existing and new business models. The authors have conducted an intensive analysis of the business model characteristics of 45 providers in the cloud market that are critical to success. A cloud business model framework with 105 characteristics was used to systemize the business models, and the data was analyzed statistically in regard to indicators for success. The results revealed 42 success-related business model characteristics, and a cluster analysis led to three common combinations of characteristics that describe meta types of cloud business models. The most promising meta type is a specialized cloud provider with customer-oriented branch solutions, while small-scale newcomers with aggregation services experience difficulties to be competitive. To evaluate and verify the results and the success of each business model type, 12 expert interviews were conducted. The interview statements were aggregated and summarized to offer recommendations for action and a prediction for the success of cloud business models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Debei MM, Avison D (2010) Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. Eur J Inf Syst (EJIS) 19(3):359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg MR (1973) Cluster analysis for applications. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacher J, Pöge A, Wenzig K (2010) Clusteranalyse: Anwendungsorientierte Einführung in Klassifikationsverfahren, 3rd edn. Oldenbourg, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter J, Eyles J (1997) Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis. Trans Inst Br Geogr 22:505–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettis RA, Hitt MA (1995) The new competitive landscape. Strateg Manag J (SMJ) 16(S1):7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blashfield RK (1976) Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods. J Psychol Bull 83(3):377–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart T, Krumeich J, Werth D, Loos P (2011) Analyzing the business model concept – a comprehensive classification of literature. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) 32

  • Cohen SS, Zysman J, DeLong BJ (2000) Tools for thought: what is new and important about the “e-conomy”? Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Clark VL (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • de Brentani U (1991) Success factors in developing new business services. Eur J Mark 25(2):33–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles RG (1991) The performance measurement manifesto. Harv Bus Rev 69(1):131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst CH, Rothlauf F (2012) Potenzielle Erfolgsfaktoren von SaaS-Unternehmen. In: Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI)

  • Faust D (1982) A needed component in prescriptions for science: empirical knowledge of human cognitive limitations. Sci Commun 3(4):555–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz H, Kopp R (2004) Betriebliche Experteninterviews. Sozialwissenschaften und Berufspraxis 27(1):51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner (2013) Hype cycle for emerging technologies 2013: Gartner’s 2013 hype cycle for emerging technologies maps out evolving relationship between humans and machines. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2575515

  • Gaskell G (2000) Individual and group interviewing. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G (eds) Qualitative researching: a practical handbook. Sage, London, pp 38–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Gläser J, Laudel G (2010) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, 4th edn. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon RJ (2000) Does the “New Economy” measure up to the great inventions of the past? National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 7833

  • Grupp H, Schubert T (2010) Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance. Res Policy 39(1):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes B (2008) Cloud computing. Commun ACM 51(7):9–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf C (2004) Qualitative interviews: an overview. In: Flick U, von Kardoff E, Steinke I (eds) A companion to qualitative research. Sage, London, pp 203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsti A, Tolonen J, Brannback M (2004) Electronic business models: five cases from five industries. In: Proceedings of the European conference on information systems (ECIS)

  • Hsieh H, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. J Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittner CD, Larcker DF, Meyer MW (2003) Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. Account Rev 78(3):725–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch LJ (2004) Deploying common systems globally: the dynamics of control. Int J Inf Syst Res 15(4):374–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labes S, Erek K, Zarnekow R (2013a) Common patterns of cloud business models. In: Proceedings of the Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS) 19

  • Labes S, Erek K, Zarnekow R (2013b) Literaturübersicht von Geschäftsmodellen in der Cloud. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI) 11

  • Labes S, Hanner N, Zarnekow R (2015) Success factors of cloud business models. In: Proceedings of the European conference on information systems (ECIS) 23

  • Lambert SC, Davidson RA (2013) Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, innovation and classification: an analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010. Eur Manag J (EMJ) 31:668–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AH, Chen W, Chang C (2008) A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leidecker JK, Bruno AV (1984) Identifying and using critical success factors. Int J Long Range Plan (LRP) 17(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold R, Trinczek R (2009) Experteninterviews. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring P (2004) Qualitative content analysis. In: Flick U, von Kardoff E, Steinke I (eds) A companion to qualitative research. Sage, London, pp 266–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Mell P, Grance T (2011) The NIST definition of cloud computing. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Computer Security. doi:10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qalitative data analysis. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers MD (1997) Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Q 21(June):241–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder A (2004) The business model ontology: a proposition in a design science approach. Thesis. Université de Lausanne

  • Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Clark T (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters TJ, Waterman RH (1982) In search of excellence: lessons from America’s best-run companies, 2nd edn. Profile, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Punj G, Stewart DW (1983) Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for application. J Mark Res 20(May):134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockart JF (1979) Chief executives define their own data needs. Harv Bus Rev 57(2):81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockart JF (1982) The changing role of the inf syst executive: a critical success factors perspective. Sloan Manag Rev 23(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling J (2006) On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: designing the process for content analysis. Eur J Psychol Assess 22(1):28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeffler S, Buzzell RD, Heany DF (1974) Impact of strategic planning on profit performance. Harvard University, Boston, MA, Graduate School of Business Administration, pp 137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer SM, Smith HJ, Linder JC (2005) The power of business models. Bus Horizons 48:199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staehler P (2002) Business models as an unit of analysis for strategizing. International Workshop on Business Models. http://www.hec.unil.ch/aosterwa/Documents/workshop/Draft_Staehler.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2016

  • Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27(2):237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan L (2004) Exploring website features for business information. J Scientometr 61(3):467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan L, Yang R (2012) Web data as academic and business quality estimates: a comparison of three data sources. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol (ASIS&T) 63(10):1960–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veit D, Clemons E, Benlian A, Buxmann P, Hess T, Kundisch D, Leimeister JM, Loos P, Spann M (2014) Business models. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Bala H (2013) Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q 37(1):21–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther S, Plank A, Eymann T, Singh N, Phadke G (2012) Success factors and value propositions of software as a service providers – a literature review and classification. In: Proceedings of the Americas conference on Inf Syst (AMCIS)

  • Wang F, Vaughan L (2014) Firm web visibility and its business value. J Internet Res (INTR) 24(3):292–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhardt C, Anandasivam A, Blau B, Borissov N, Meinl T, Michalk W, Stößer J (2009) Cloud computing – a classification, business models, and research directions. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(5):391–399. doi:10.1007/s12599-009-0071-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz BW (2010) Electronic business, 3rd edn. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2005) Qualitative research. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zerdick A, Picot A, Schrape K, Artope A, Goldhammer K, Heger DK, Lange UT, Vierkant E, Lopez-Escobar E, Silverstone R (2001) Die Internet-Ökonomie: Strategien für die digitale Wirtschaft. Europ Commun Council Rep, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Zolnowski A, Boehmann T (2011) Business modeling for services: current state and research perspectives. In: Proceedings of the Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS) 17

  • Zott C, Amit R, Massa L (2011) The business model: recent developments and future research. J Manag (JoM) 37(4):1019–1042

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany

    Stine Labes, Nicolai Hanner &  Ruediger Zarnekow

Authors
  1. Stine Labes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolai Hanner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruediger Zarnekow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stine Labes.

Additional information

Accepted after two revisions by Prof. Dr. Bichler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Labes, S., Hanner, N. & Zarnekow, R. Successful Business Model Types of Cloud Providers. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59, 223–233 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0455-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0455-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation