Skip to main content
Log in

Low-flow aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Echocardiography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 12 January 2014

Abstract

Valvular aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvular disease in developed countries. Treatment decisions in AS are mainly based upon the symptomatic status of the patient and the severity of AS. Doppler echocardiography represents the standard tool for detecting and assessing the severity of the disease. Under the same denomination of severe AS [aortic valve area (AVA) < 1 cm2], several entities might be identified that differ in terms of trans-valvular flow rates and pressure gradients development. From a clinical standpoint, severe AS (AVA < 1 cm2) can be subdivided into 4 flow-gradient patterns: normal flow/low gradient (NF/LG), normal flow/high gradient (NF/HG), low flow/high gradient (LF/HG) and low flow/low gradient (LF/LG). The most commonly described entity is the paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe AS state, in which the stroke volume is unexpectedly reduced, despite preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. In daily practice, misdiagnosing this clinical condition might lead to an inappropriate timing of follow-up with an unnecessary delay of aortic valve replacement (AVR), which may, in turn, have a negative impact on patient outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lancellotti P, Donal E, Magne J, et al. Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis: the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay. Heart. 2010;96:1364–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006;114:e84–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, et al. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart. 2010;96:1463–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adda J, Mielot C, Giorgi R, et al. Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, et al. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115:2856–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B. Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:281–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jander N, Minners J, Holme I, et al. Outcome of patients with low-gradient “severe” aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2011;123:887–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1845–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Akins C. New approaches to quantifying aortic stenosis severity. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008;10:91–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area. Heart. 2010;96:1431–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lancellotti P, Magne J. Valvuloarterial impedance in aortic stenosis: look at the load, but do not forget the flow. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:354–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, et al. Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:235–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lancellotti P, Donal E, Magne J, et al. Impact of global left ventricular afterload on left ventricular function in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:537–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Monin JL, Lancellotti P, Monchi M, et al. Risk score for predicting outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrmann S, Störk S, Niemann M, et al. Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:402–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zoghbi WA. Low-gradient “severe” aortic stenosis with normal systolic function: time to refine the guidelines? Circulation. 2011;123:838–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lancellotti P, Lebois F, Simon M, et al. Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2005;112(9 Suppl):I377–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clavel MA, Ennezat PV, Maréchaux S, et al. Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:175–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lancellotti P, Rosenhek R, Pibarot P, et al. ESC Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease position paper—heart valve clinics: organization, structure, and experiences. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1597–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehrotra P, Jansen K, Flynn AW, et al. Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1906–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, et al. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1259–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tarantini G, Covolo E, Razzolini R, et al. Valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction exceeding 0.50. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1808–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barasch E, Fan D, Chukwu EO, et al. Severe isolated aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular systolic function and low transvalvular gradients: pathophysiologic and prognostic insights. J Heart Valve Dis. 2008;17:81–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None related to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizio Lancellotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lancellotti, P., Seisyou, K. Low-flow aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Echocardiogr 12, 12–16 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-013-0201-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-013-0201-1

Keywords

Navigation