Abstract
The aim of this study is to contribute to the determination of the normal values of human anogenital distance (AGD) and anal position index (API) in the antenatal period. 59 formalin-fixed human fetuses were examined. AGD was measured by the distance between the center of the anus and the posterior fourchette in females, and the distance between the center of the anus and the posterior scrotal raphe in males. API in female fetuses was determined with the formula API = fourchette–center of anus/fourchette-coccyx formula, and API = posterior scrotal raphe-center of anus/posterior scrotal raphe-coccyx in males. The mean AGDs of the female and male fetuses in the second trimester were 5.60 ± 1.60 mm and 9.64 ± 2.75 mm and 12.88 ± 4.14 mm and 17.26 ± 5.55 mm in the third trimester, respectively. The AGD values were found to be significantly higher in the males (p = 0.002). While the API values detected in the female and male fetuses were 0.43 ± 0.085 and 0.55 ± 0.072 in the second trimester, they were 0.46 ± 0.079 and 0.55 ± 0.058 in the third trimester. The API values were found to be significantly higher in the male fetuses (p < 0.001). When the distribution of API values of the fetuses in the second and third trimesters was examined, no significant difference was found (p = 0.499). In addition, no significant correlation was found between API and AGD values and percentile groups of fetuses (p ˃ 0.05). The AGD and API differed significantly between female and male fetuses starting from the antenatal second trimester, and the difference was preserved independently of the fetal percentile in the later stages of pregnancy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aydin E, Holt R, Chaplin D, Hawkes R, Allison C, Hackett G, Austin T, Tsompanidis A, Gabis L, Ziv SI, Baron-Cohen S (2019) Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound. Prenat Diagn 39:527–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5459
Baron-Cohen S, Auyeung B, Nørgaard-Pedersen B, Hougaard DM, Abdallah MW, Melgaard L, Cohen AS, Chakrabarti B, Ruta L, Lombardo MV (2015) Elevated fetal steroidogenic activity in autism. Mol Psychiatry 20:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.48
Broome DR, Hayman LA, Herrick RC, Braverman RM, Glass RB, Fahr LM (1998) Postnatal maturation of the sacrum and coccyx: MR imaging, helical CT, and conventional radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(4):1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530059
Callegari C, Everett S, Ross M, Brasel JA (1987) Anogenital ratio: measure of fetal virilization in premature and full-term newborn infants. J Pediatr 111:240–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80075-6
Chan WT, Lee HC, Wang WN, Yeung CY, Jiang CB (2009) Determination of the normal position of the anus in Taiwanese infants. Pediatr Neonatol 50:158–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1875-9572(09)60055-3 (PMID: 19750890)
Colmant C, Morin-Surroca M, Fuchs F, Fernandez H, Senat MV (2013) Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal sex determination: is ultrasound still relevant? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 171:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.005
Cools M, Nordenström A, Robeva R, Hall J, Westerveld P, Flück C, Köhler B, Berra M, Springer A, Schweizer K, Pasterski V (2018) Caring for individuals with a difference of sex development (DSD): a consensus statement. Nat Rev Endocrinol 14:415–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-018-0010-8
Davari HA, Hosseinpour M (2006) The anal position index: a simple method to define the normal position of the anus in neonate. Acta Paediatr 95:877–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/08035250500449882
Dean A, Sharpe RM (2013) Clinical review: anogenital distance or digit length ratio as measures of fetal androgen exposure: relationship to male reproductive development and its disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:2230–2238. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-4057
Dean A, Smith LB, Macpherson S, Sharpe RM (2012) The effect of dihydrotestosterone exposure during or prior to the masculinization programming window on reproductive development in male and female rats. Int J Androl 35:330–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01236.x
Efrat Z, Akinfenwa OO, Nicolaides KH (1999) First-trimester determination of fetal gender by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:305–307. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.14690705
Eisenberg ML, Hsieh TC, Lipshultz LI (2013) The relationship between anogenital distance and age. Andrology 1:90–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00019.x
Ertürk N, Kandemir Ö (2017) Determination of normal anal position index using a modified technique in Turkish neonates. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 22:29–32. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.194617
Genç A, Taneli C, Tansuğ N, Kasirga E, Yilmaz D, Küçükoğlu T, Onağ A (2002) Evaluation of the location of the anus by a modified technique in the neonate. J Pediatr Surg 37:80–82. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.29432
Gilboa Y, Perlman S, Kivilevitch Z, Messing B, Achiron R (2017) Prenatal anogenital distance is shorter in fetuses with hypospadias. J Ultrasound Med 36:175–182
Hernández-Peñalver AI, Sánchez-Ferrer ML, Mendiola J, Adoamnei E, Prieto-Sanchez MT, Corbalan-Biyang S, Carmona-Barnosi A, Nieto A, Torres-Cantero AM (2018) Assessment of anogenital distance as a diagnostic tool in polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online 37:741–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00019.x
Isbir C, Elvan Ö, Taşkınlar H, Çetin Z, Temel G (2020) Assessment of clitoral anatomy in human fetuses. Surg Radiol Anat: SRA 42:453–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02383-9
Kluth D, Hillen M, Lambrecht W (1995) The principles of normal and abnormal hindgut development. J Pediatr Surg 30(8):1143–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(95)90007-1
Loreto-Gómez C, Farías P, Moreno-Macías H, Romano-Riquer SP, Riojas-Rodríguez H (2017) Anogenital distance: a longitudinal evaluation of its variants and indices in boys and girls of Sonora, Mexico. Reprod Toxicol 73:167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.08.011
Mackanjee HR, Iliescu BM, Dawson WB (1996) Assessment of postnatal gestational age using sonographic measurements of femur length. J Ultrasound Med 15:115–120. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1996.15.2.115
Najdi N, Safi F, Hashemi-Dizaji S, Sahraian G, Jand Y (2019) First trimester determination of fetal gender by ultrasonographic measurement of anogenital distance: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed 17:51–56. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i1.3820
Núñez-Ramos R, Fabbro MA, González-Velasco M, Núñez Núñez R, Romanato B, Vecchiato L, D’Agostino S, Blesa Sánchez E (2011) Determination of the anal position in newborns and in children with chronic constipation: comparative study in two European healthcare centres. Pediatr Surg Int 27:1111–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2914-4
Pang D (1993) Sacral agenesis and caudal spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery 32(5):755–779. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199305000-00009
Papadopoulou E, Vafeiadi M, Agramunt S, Basagana X, Mathianaki K, Karacosta P, Spanaki A, Koutis A, Chatzi L, Vrijheid M, Kogevinas M (2013) Anogenital distances in newborns and children from Spain and Greece: predictors, tracking and reliability. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 27:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12022
Pedreira DA, Yamasaki A, Czeresnia CE (2001) Fetal phallus “erection” interfering with the sonographic determination of fetal gender in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:402–404. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00532.x
Reisner SH, Sivan Y, Nitzan M, Merlob P (1984) Determination of anterior displacement of the anus in newborn infants and children. Pediatrics 73:216–217
Romano-Riquer SP, Hernández-Avila M, Gladen BC, Cupul-Uicab LA, Longnecker MP (2007) Reliability and determinants of anogenital distance and penis dimensions in male newborns from Chiapas, Mexico. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21:219–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00810.x
Salazar-Martinez E, Romano-Riquer P, Yanez-Marquez E, Longnecker MP, Hernandez-Avila M (2004) Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Environ Health 3:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-3-8
Sathyanarayana S, Beard L, Zhou C, Grady R (2010) Measurement and correlates of ano-genital distance in healthy, newborn infants. Int J Androl 33:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01044.x
Suryana Y, Makhmudi A (2018) Assessment of the normal anal position index (API) of Indonesian neonates. J Med Sci 50:431–435. https://doi.org/10.19106/JMedScie/005004201807
Thankamony A, Pasterski V, Ong KK, Acerini CL, Hughes IA (2016) Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans. Andrology 4:616–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12156
Van Der Straaten S, Springer A, Zecic A et al (2020) The external genitalia score (EGS): a European multicenter validation study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105:142. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz142
Vocel J, Marková H (1978) Význam vrásnĕní plosky a délky nohy pro upresnĕní gestacního vĕku novorozence [Signifivance of sole dermatoglyphics and of foot length in the accurate determination of gestational age in newborn infants]. Cesk Pediatr 33:618–620
Welsh M, Saunders PT, Fisken M, Scott HM, Hutchinson GR, Smith LB, Sharpe RM (2008) Identification in rats of a programming window for reproductive tract masculinization, disruption of which leads to hypospadias and cryptorchidism. J Clin Invest 118:1479–1490. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI34241
Woon JT, Stringer MD (2012) Clinical anatomy of the coccyx: a systematic review. Clin Anat 25(2):158–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21216
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science, so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind’s overall knowledge that can then improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude.
Funding
This research did not receive any grant from the commercial or non-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HT and OE: protocol development, data analysis, and manuscript writing; CI and IK: data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing; AN: protocol development, manuscript writing, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Taşkınlar, H., Elvan, Ö., İsbir, C. et al. Anogenital distance and anal position index in cadaveric human fetuses. Anat Sci Int 98, 155–163 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-022-00680-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-022-00680-9