Abstract
Assessment of the range of motion at a joint is among the methods employed by orthopedic surgeons and physiotherapists to determine courses of therapy and joint recovery. Females tend to have a greater range of motion at the elbow joint than males. In the present case–control study, the elbow extension angle was compared between males and females with and without the supratrochlear aperture. A total of 453 dry humeri and their corresponding ulnae were included in the study, and elbow extension angle was measured using a goniometer. The average extension angle in this sample was 173°, and it was significantly greater when the STA was present (\(\bar{X}\) = 175.4°) than when it was absent (\(\bar{X}\) = 171°). It was greater in females (\(\bar{X}\) = 174.5°) than in males (\(\bar{X}\) = 171.3°) irrespective of STA status, and was greater on the left in both sexes. Hyperextension characterized 13 % of the sample, whereas the majority (76 %) showed hypoextension and only a few (11 %) exhibited normal extension. Trochlear notch depth and olecranon–coronoid distance would found to be useful for predicting the presence of the supratrochlear aperture, while the transverse and vertical diameters of the supratrochlear aperture were found to be the most useful parameters when predicting the degree of extension. The functional benefits of hyperextension at the elbow joint are not fully understood. However, these results are important to orthopedic surgeons and physiotherapists as they permit a greater understanding of normal elbow range of motion in the South African population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akagi R, Takai Y, Kato E, Wakahara T, Ohta M, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T, Kawakami Y (2010) Development of an equation to predict muscle volume of elbow flexors for men and women with a wide range of age. Euro J Appl Physiol 108:689–694
Bland MD, Beebe JA, Hardwick DD, Lang CE (2008) Restricted active range of motion at the elbow, forearm, wrist, or fingers decreases hand function. J Hand Ther 21:268–274
Bryce CD, Armstrong AD (2008) Anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow. Orthop Clin N Am 39:141–154
Chapleau J, Canet F, Petit Y, Sandman E, Laflamme GY, Rouleau DM (2013) Demographic and anthropometric factors affecting elbow range of motion in healthy adults. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:88–93
Christos P, Marios P, Apostolos S (2011) Rare cases of humerus septal apertures in Greeks. Trends Med Res 6:178–183
De Groot JH, Angulo SM, Meskers CG, van der Heijden-Maessen HC, Arendzen JH (2011) Reduced elbow mobility affects the flexion or extension domain in activities of daily living. Clin Biomech 26:713–717
De Wilde V, De Maeseneer M, Lenchik L, Van Roy P, Beeckman P, Osteaux M (2004) Normal osseous variants presenting as cystic or lucent areas on radiography and CT imaging: a pictorial overview. Eur J Radiol 51:77–84
Ellenbecker TS, Roetert EP (2003) Isokinetic profile of elbow flexion and extension strength in elite junior tennis players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33:79–84
Erdogmus S, Guler M, Eroglu S, Duran N (2014) The importance of the supratrochlear foramen of the humerus in humans: an anatomical study. Med Sci Monit 20:2643–2650
Glanville EV (1967) Perforation of the coronoid-olecranon septum. Humero-ulnar relationships in The Netherlands and African populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 26:85–92
Gunal I, Kose N, Erdogan O, Gokturk E, Seber S (1996) Normal range of motion of the joints of the upper extremity in male subjects, with special reference to side. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78:1401–1404
Hirsh IS (1927) The supratrochlear foramen: clinical and anthropological considerations. Am J Surg 2:500–505
Houshian S, Mehdi B, Larsen MS (2001) The epidemiology of elbow fracture in children: analysis of 355 fractures, with special reference to supracondylar humerus fractures. J Orthop Sci 6:312–315
Krishnamurthy A, Yelicharla A, Takkalapalli A, Munishamappa V, Bovinndala B, Chandramohan M (2011) Supratrochlear foramen of humerus—a morphometric study. Int J Biol Med Res 2:829–831
Kubicka AM, Myszka A, Piontek J (2015) Geometric morphometrics: does the appearance of the septal aperture depend on the shape of ulnar processes? Anat Rec (Hoboken) 298:2030–2038
Magermans DJ, Chadwick EK, Veeger HE, van der Helm FC (2005) Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living. Clin Biomech 20:591–599
Mays S (2008) Septal aperture of the humerus in a mediaeval human skeletal population. Am J Phys Anthropol 136:432–440
Myszka A, Trzciński D (2015) Septal aperture and osteoarthritis—the same or independent origins? Adv Anthropol 5:116–121
Ndou R, Schepartz LA (2016) Morphometric characteristics of the humerus and ulna in limbs bearing the supratrochlear aperture (STA). Anat Rec (Hoboken) 299:220–233
Ndou R, Smith P, Gemell R, Mohatla O (2013) The supratrochlear foramen of the humerus in a South African dry bone sample. Clin Anat 26:870–874
O’Neill OR, Morrey BF, Tanaka S, An KN (1992) Compensatory motion in the upper extremity after elbow arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 281:89–96
Papaloucas C, Papaloucas M, Stergioulas A (2012) Rare cases of humerus septal apertures in Greeks. Trends Med Res 6:178–183
Provins KA, Salter N (1955) Maximum torque exerted about the elbow joint. J Appl Physiol 7:393–398
Rouleau DM, Canet F, Chapleau J, Petit Y, Sandman E, Faber KJ, Athwal GS (2012) The influence of proximal ulnar morphology on elbow range of motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:384–388
Sahajpal DT, Pichora D (2006) Septal aperture: an anatomic variant predisposing to bilateral low-energy fractures of the distal humerus. Can J Surg 49:363–364
Singhal S, Rao V (2007) Supratrochlear foramen of the humerus. Anat Sci Int 82:105–107
Smits-Engelsman B, Klerks M, Kirby A (2011) Beighton score: a valid measure for generalized hypermobility in children. J Pediatr 158:119–123, 123:e1–4
Soucie JM, Wang C, Forsyth A, Funk S, Denny M, Roach KE, Boone D, The Hemophilia Treatment Center N (2011) Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia 17:500–507
Vasen AP, Lacey SH, Keith MW, Shaffer JW (1995) Functional range of motion of the elbow. J Hand Surg Am 20:288–292
Acknowledgments
I am very grateful to my mentor Professor Lynne Schepartz for guidance, and to Brendon Billings for access to the skeletal collection and Thokozani Zwane for assistance with data collection. Dr. Tope Esan assisted with advice on the application of statistical methods.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
Funds for the project came from the National Research Council (South Africa), grant number 84389, University of the Witwatersrand Faculty Research Council, the Wits WHC dividend, grant number 001-403-8421101.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ndou, R. The significance of the supratrochlear aperture (STA) in elbow range of motion: an anatomical study. Anat Sci Int 93, 88–97 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-016-0376-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-016-0376-4