Abstract
The occurrence of a likely graptolite in lowest Wuliuan strata of the Franconian Forest almost certainly records the oldest known graptolithoid hemichordate in West Gondwana and possibly the oldest graptolite presently known. The fossil is a delicate, erect, apparently unbranched rhabdosome with narrow thecae tentatively assigned to the poorly known genus Ovetograptus of the Dithecodendridae. This report includes an overview of pre-Furongian graptolithoids with slight corrections on the stratigraphic position of earlier reported species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cambrian graptolithoid hemichordates almost certainly were relatively common sessile, benthic faunal elements during the Middle and Late Cambrian (Miaolingian and Furongian), and may have their earliest known appearances in the upper Lower Cambrian (see review in Landing et al. 2018). However, formal reports of these early eucolonial metazoans are fairly rare. The reason for this is that diagenesis and metamorphism often obscure a taxonomically useful preservation. In addition, putative early representatives of graptolithoids, particularly the colonial Graptolithina, appear to have been occasionally assigned to other groups, such as “algae” (e.g., Walcott 1919). Nevertheless, several species of undisputable graptolites have been reported from Middle Cambrian/Miaolingian strata (see Overview and stratigraphic revision of pre-Furongian graptolites).
This report describes a fossil from the lowest Wuliuan Stage and Miaolingian Series of the Franconian Forest, Germany that is almost certainly the oldest known graptolite in West Gondwana. Although the specimen is not very well preserved, there is little doubt about its systematic position as discussed below. Given limited outcrop at a small, overgrown quarry where it was collected, it is unlikely that additional specimens will be collected, so the specimen merits a short characterization.
Taxonomic and chronologic terminology
The suprageneric taxonomy in this report follows Beklemishev (1951) in his definition of the Graptolithoidea Beklemishev (1951) as a class that is identical to and a senior synonym of Maletz’ (2014) expanded class “Pterobranchia.” The Graptolithoidea (late Early Cambrian?–Recent) include a subclass Graptolithina for all modular colonial animals with organic thecal walls with fusellar structure (i.e., Landing et al. 2018, p. 125). The reptant, sessile modular colonies of the rhabdopleurids and dithecoids represent families of the Graptolithina (i.e., Maletz 2014, 2017), while sessile forms with triad budding and bush- or fan-like rhabdosomes are the order Dendroidea (Upper Cambrian–Carboniferous). The remaining pelagic graptolithines are assigned to the order Graptoloidea Lapworth in Hopkinson and Lapworth (1875) (Lower Ordovician–Lower Devonian). In this report, the Cambrian is divided into three proposed, formally defined subsystems (Lower, Middle, Upper) and subperiods (Early, Middle, Late) following Landing et al. (2020).
Material, locality, stratigraphy, and geological setting
The graptolite is known from a single incomplete specimen collected from the lower Wildenstein Member of the Tannenknock Formation in the Wildenstein tectonic block of the Franconian Forest (i.e., Frankenwald) of northeastern Bavaria, Germany (Fig. 1). The collection locality is a small abandoned quarry north of Wildenstein (ca. N 50° 12′ 01″, E 11° 33′ 35″) and is locality W9 of Geyer et al. (2019a, Appendix 1; Fig. 2).
The Cambrian succession of the Franconian Forest region is remarkably similar to that of the south Moroccan margin of West Gondwana (Geyer et al. 2019a). Thus, the specimen discussed herein expands the known record of Middle Cambrian West Gondwanan graptolites known from Iberia, as well as the Barrandian region (“Perunica”) of Gondwana and East Gondwana (Victoria and Tasmania, Australia) (discussed below).
The lower Wildenstein Member is typically composed of fine-grained, shallow-marine sandstones of variable thicknesses. Its fauna consists of a moderately diverse assemblage dominated by trilobites with locally abundant articulate and acrothelid brachiopods, hyoliths and relatively rare helcionelloids, echinoderm ossicles from different systematic groups, bradoriids, sponge spicules, and remains of other fossil groups (e.g., Geyer 2010, 2017; Geyer et al. 2019a, 2019b; Streng and Geyer 2019).
The graptolite comes from a relatively hard, slightly feldspathic sandstone in a facies recording agitated waters. It is associated with a cranidium of the trilobite Parasolenopleura sp. (Fig. 3.1). Associated fossils are fairly large and commonly unfractured sclerites of other trilobites and hyoliths.
This part of the succession belongs to the Ornamentaspis frequens Zone in the regional biostratigraphic scheme, which corresponds to the O. frequens Zone of the Moroccan Anti-Atlas and characterizes the middle Agdzian Stage (see Geyer and Landing 2004) (Fig. 5). Unfortunately, this West Gondwanan biostratigraphy cannot be correlated precisely with the internationally applied chronostratigraphy, but the O. frequens Zone is thought to correspond to the lowest Wuliuan Stage and Miaolingian Series (e.g., Geyer 2019).
Systematic palaeontology
Class Graptolithoidea Beklemishev, 1951
Subclass Graptolithina Bronn, 1849
Incertae sedis
Family Dithecodendridae Obut, 1964
(Senior synonym of Dithecoidea Rickards and Durham, 2006).
Discussion. For genera assigned to the Dithecodendridae, see discussion in Maletz (2014, p. 490, 491).
Several graptolite taxa were described by Sdzuy (1974) from shales of the lower Oville Formation in the Oviedo and León provinces of the Cantabrian Mountains, northern Spain. Sdzuy (1974) recognized 11 different species and forms in open nomenclature, which he assigned to the four genera Tarnagraptus Sdzuy, 1974; Sotograptus Sdzuy, 1974; Ovetograptus Sdzuy, 1974; and Archaeolafoea Chapman, 1919. The specimens come from upper Agdzian–Caesaraugustan (upper Wuliuan–lower Drumian) strata. Mierzejewski (1986) suggested that most of the taxa are colonial scyphopolyps. However, based on recognizable fusellar rings, Maletz et al. (2005) considered them to be early graptolites.
The species from the Cantabrian Mountains are all erect colonies with limited branching. Taxa with comparable morphology are rare but include material (unnamed genus and species) from Drumian strata of the Chancellor Basin, British Columbia (Johnston et al. 2009); material assigned to Archaeolafoea and Mastigiograptus from the Middle Cambrian Wheeler and Marjum formations of Utah (LoDuca and Kramer 2014); and in the upper Wuliuan/Floran Heathcote fauna of the Monegeetta Shale Formation of Victoria, Australia (Chapman 1919; Chapman and Thomas 1936).
Genus Ovetograptus Sdzuy, 1974
Type species. Ovetograptus gracilis Sdzuy, 1974, from the lower Oville Formation of the Cantabrian Mountains, Spain (by original designation).
Discussion. Ovetograptus is characterized and distinguished from the closely related genera Tarnagraptus Sdzuy, 1974, and Sotograptus Sdzuy, 1974, by its long and very slender thecae, which are barely wider than the axis to which they are attached. In the only described species, O. gracilis, the thecae are distant from each other and the rhabdosome has a loose habit as emphasized by Sdzuy (1974).
Ovetograptus? sp.
Material. Single specimen from locality W9 of the Tannenknock Formation, Wildenstein Member (see Geyer et al. 2019a, b, fig. 10, for additional information on sample location). Reposited in the Mineralienkabinett S. Meier collection, Marktredwitz, SSMM 10357b.
Description. The specimen is a curved, almost horseshoe-shaped, unbranched rhabdosome more than 20 mm in length and 11 mm wide. Stolonal axis ca. 0.25–0.35 mm wide, slightly deformed during deposition and burial. The thecae appear to be arranged along the axis in a relatively unordered, pseudo-verticillate manner. Thecae ca. 2.0–2.4 mm long and ca. 0.2–2.5 mm wide, branch from axis at angles of generally ca. 25–40°; thecae nearly straight tubes with subparallel margins, but slightly broadened in the middle part in some of the thecae probably due to dorsoventral compression.
Preservation and suprageneric taxonomy. The Franconian Forest region underwent tectonic deformation during the Variscan/Hercynian Orogeny. The Cambrian is preserved as large blocks in a Lower Carboniferous melange and recognizable Cambrian fossils are limited in abundance. This means that the preservation of this specimen likely would not include preservation of such fine structures as the fusellar rings characteristic of graptolites. However, despite the imperfect preservation, fine details indicate the presence of transverse elements composing the stolonal axis, which appear to be intensified and amplified by compression and secondary transverse cracks, but represent primary structures (e.g., Fig. 3.4, .5, .10, arrowed). Examination under Backscatter SEM imaging did not reveal details which prove the presence of unequivocal fusellar sutures, but show rhythmic transverse lines created by residual organic material (e.g., Fig. 3.7, .9, .10) which suggest a primary compartmental composition. These “units” are subequal in size and broader (along the axis of the stolon) than the usual fuselli of younger/later graptolites (e.g., in Archaeolafoea longicornis; Maletz and Steiner 2015, fig. 3C).
The specimen is preserved as a thick black carbon film which indicates original organic walls (Fig. 3.2, .4, .9, .10). This suggests that the form cannot be assigned to the morphologically similar, colonial cnidarian Sphenothallus Hall, 1847, which has phosphatic wall structure (i.e., Landing et al. 2018). Organic wall structure is obviously consistent with assignment of the specimen to non-mineralized hydrozoans [as indicated by minor shrinkage cracks (e.g., Fig. 3.6, .7, .8, arrowed)]. However, hydrozoans are often characterized by paired thecae and hydrocladia (i.e., Song et al. 2021), and the Franconian Forest specimen has superficially alternating (but in fact pseudo-verticillate) thecae. There is no evidence of hydrocladia and not a regular alternation in arrangement of thecae as in some extant hydrozoans.
Discussion. The specimen resembles the only known species of Ovetograptus, O. gracilis, in the morphology of the rhabdosome as well as the size of the thecae. Ovetograptus gracilis has slender, straight-to-slightly curved thecae with a width comparable to or slightly narrower than the axis. However, O. gracilis is distinguished from the form represented by the specimen from the Franconian Forest. The latter has distinctly more elongate and more widely spaced thecae that branch from the axis at a higher angle and more delicate thecae and rhabdosome. Nevertheless, more and better preserved material would be needed to provide a well-defined characterization of the species represented by the described specimen.
Overview and stratigraphic revision of pre-Furongian graptolites
Undisputed graptolites from Middle Cambrian/Miaolingian strata include specimens from most of the Cambrian continents. The following list compliments the reviews in Maletz and Steiner (2015, fig. 11) and Ramírez-Guerrero and Cameron (2021, fig. 1), but also corrects or adjusts the stratigraphic information on the provenance of the Middle Cambrian taxa.
In general, three distinctly different morphological types of rhabdosomes can be distinguished. Several genera such as the Iberian Tarnagraptus, Ovetograptus, and Sotograptus and the Siberian and North China genus Siberiodendrum are erect colonies with limited branching or are unbranched and have relatively narrow tubes.
A distinctly different morphology is exhibited by Sphenoecium Chapman and Thomas, 1936, a genus which in its revised concept suggested by Maletz and Steiner (2015) includes several Miaolingian species from different Cambrian continents. The species of this genus are colonies with encrusting thecorhizae and numerous erect, tubular thecae that are usually relatively broad. This genus was tentatively assigned to the family Rhabdopleuridae (along with the morphologically distinct genus Archaeolafoea; see Maletz 2014; Maletz and Steiner 2015).
A third group is represented by Mastigograptus Ruedemann, 1908. This genus, characterized by trifid budding and erect rhabsosomes with widely separated autothecae, comprises the family Mastigograptidae.
The West Gondwana margin of the giant Gondwana continent has yielded Middle Cambrian graptolites from shales of the Oville Formation in the Cantabrian Mountains, northern Spain (Sdzuy 1974). These graptolites have a fairly long stratigraphical range from the upper Agdzian through the middle Caesaraugustan (= upper Wuliuan–middle Drumian). All known specimens are erect rhabdosomes of the Dithecodendridae. The form described by Sdzuy (1974) as Archaeolafoea sp. A is regarded herein as a probable new dithecodendrid closely related to the three other genera known from the Oville Formation (i.e., Tarnagraptus, Ovetograptus, Sotograptus).
East Gondwana has a number of probable upper Wuliuan/Floran graptolites in the Heathcote fauna of the Monegeetta Shale Formation of Victoria, Australia (Chapman 1919; Chapman and Thomas 1936), and the Dundas Group of Tasmania, Australia (Thomas and Henderson 1945; Quilty 1971). Two species from the Monegeetta Shale, Sphenoecium filicoides (Chapman, 1919) and S. discoidalis Chapman and Thomas, 1936, are congeneric with several species of Sphenoecium described from Bohemia, Norway, the western United States, and the Canadian Cordillera. Other species identified from the formation are Archaeolafoea longicornis Chapman, 1919; A. monegeetae Chapman, 1919; and Archaeocryptolaria skeatsi Chapman, 1919, with the latter considered to be a synonym of Archaeolafoea longicornis (i.e., Maletz and Steiner 2015). Protohalecium Chapman and Thomas, 1936, is another graptolite with a sinuously branching rhabdosome with increasing thecae separation proximally (Rickards and Durman 2006; Ramírez-Guerrero and Cameron 2021). The material from the Dundas Group has been described as Mastigograptus serialis Chapman and Thomas, 1936; M. simplex (Walcott, 1919); and Archaeolafoea monegeetae (Quilty, 1971). However, the specimens are poorly preserved and need careful revision.
Maletz et al. (2005) reported a graptolite species characterized by encrusting thecorhiza and erect tubes from the Perunica/Barrandian region of Gondwana. This is Rhabdotubus robustus Maletz et al. 2005, from the upper Jince Formation of the Barrandian region of the Czech Republic. The species was subsequently revised to Sphenoecium robustum by Maletz and Steiner (2015; erroneously spelled “Sphenoecium robustus”). Its known range corresponds to the middle Caesaraugustan Stage (=middle Drumian). This species has also been recorded from distinctly older strata of the lower Jince Formation from Luh, Bohemia, which belong to the middle Agdzian (=lower, but not lowest Wuliuan) (Maletz and Steiner 2015).
From the Avalonian microcontinent (e.g., Landing 1996; Landing et al. 2022), Howell (1963) described a specimen under the name Archaeolafoea terranovaensis from black shales of the Manuels River Formation on Conception Bay, southeastern Newfoundland (his “Kelligrews Brook Formation” in Howell 1963). This form was regarded as a hydrozoan. The specimen is difficult to assess. The strata from which it originates belong to the Guzhangian Paradoxides davidis Zone.
Two species have been described from the Baltica palaeocontinent. One of these is Dendrograptus mesocambricus from the Guzhangian part of the Alum Shale Formation of southern Norway (Öpik 1933). The other described by Bengtson and Urbanek (1986) is Rhabdotubus johanssoni from the upper Wuliuan part of the currently distinguished Borgholm Formation of southern Sweden. Both species have been synonymized and dealt with as Sphenoecium mesocambricum (Öpik, 1933) (erroneously spelled “Sphenoecium mesocambricus” by Maletz and Steiner (2015).
The Sibiria palaeocontinent has yielded an exceptionally well-preserved rhabdopleurid from the Zelenotsvet Formation of the southeastern Prianabar region on the Siberian Platform. The occurrence is in the Anomocarioides limbataeformis–Lejopyge laevigata/Aldanaspis truncata zones of the Bulunian Substage of the Mayan Stage (Guzhangian). It was first described as Rhabdopleura obuti by Durman and Sennikov (1993) and later revised to Sphenoecium obuti by Maletz and Steiner (2015). Associated taxa include Archaeolafoea sp. and Siberiodendrum robustum Obut, 1964 (Durman and Sennikov 1993).
Reports of graptolites from South China/the Yangtze Platform refer to specimens from the Kaili fauna of the Kaili Formation in Guizhou Province (Harvey et al. 2012). The early Wuliuan age of this material is more or less coeval with Ovetograptus? sp. described herein from the Franconian Forest. Unfortunately, the specimens from the Kaili Formation are only preserved as fragments of periderm with a distinctive banded microstructure. Harvey et al. (2012) suggested that they most likely represent rhabdopleurids. Malongitubus Hu, 2005, from the older (late Early Cambrian) Chengjiang Lagerstätte of South China has been interpreted as a possible pterobranch (and, thus, as a graptolite; Hu et al. 2018), but an unequivocal taxonomic assignment should be regarded as not possible based on the available material.
Siberiograptus Obut, 1964, is also recorded from the upper Furongian Fengshan Formation of Shandong Province, North China Platform (Lin 1985). Lin (1985) proposed two new species of the genus, S. simplex and S. polycladus. The first species is now termed Palaeodiphasia simplex, the type species of a new genus assigned to the Hydrozoa (Song et al. 2021). The latter species is poorly preserved and should be regarded as systematically problematical.
Laurentian graptolites are known from the Topazian–Marjuman (= uppermost Wuliuan–lower Guzhangian) Spence, Marjum and Wheeler formations of the western U.S., and from the Drumian Burgess Shale of Alberta, Canada (Ruedemann 1931, 1947). These include the cephalodiscid graptolithoid Cephalodiscus? sp. (see discussions in Maletz et al. 2005, and Maletz and Steiner 2015) and Sphenoecium wheelerensis Maletz and Steiner, 2015, from the Spence Shale of Idaho and the Wheeler and Marjum formations of Utah (Conway Morris and Robison 1988). The systematic position of Chaunograptus Hall, 1879, from the Burgess Shale has been disputed, but recent analyses suggest that it very likely is a rhabdopleurid graptolite (Maletz and Beli 2018; Ramírez-Guerrero and Cameron 2021). Furthermore, genera such as Yuknessia Walcott, 1919, and Dalyia Walcott, 1919, from the Drumian Burgess Shale of the Canadian Cordillera and Marjum and Wheeler formations of are regarded as Graptolithina (Maletz and Steiner 2015; LoDuca et al. 2015; Maletz and Beli 2018; Ramírez-Guerrero and Cameron 2021) and specimens from the Wheeler Formation previously identified as Yuknessia simplex Walcott, 1919, were considered as the new species S. wheelerensis (Maletz and Steiner, 2015).
Another possible graptolite from the middle Dyerian Forteau Formation of Laurentian western Newfoundland (Cambrian Stage 4) has been mentioned in Maletz and Steiner (2015, fig. 11) and would be the oldest known graptolithoid. However, it has not been figured or elsewise described.
Conclusions
The end of the Cambrian Evolutionary Radiation included the appearance of undoubted modular colonies of eumetazoans in the late Early Cambrian. These include rare specimens of coralomorphs, the likely cnidarian Sphenothallus, and the problematicum Torellella (see Landing et al. 2018). Tiny colonies of sessile graptolites may have appeared by the late Early Cambrian in tropical carbonate platform facies in NE Laurentia, and relatively abruptly have a world-wide distribution in Middle Cambrian shelf and marginal successions (Baltica, East and West Gondwana, Sibiria, western Laurentia, South China platform, possibly Avalonia). The occurrence of Ovetograptus? sp. appears to expand the lower Middle Cambrian range of early graptolites in West Gondwana from Iberia to the Franconian Forest of Germany (Fig. 5).
Change history
21 October 2022
Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note
References
Beklemishev, V.N. 1951. K postroeniyu sistemy zhivotnykh. Vtorichnorotye (Deuterostomia), ikh proizkhozdenie i sostav (Toward the building system of animals. Deuterostomia, their origin and composition). Uspekhi Sovremennoy Biologii 32: 256–270.
Chapman, F. 1919. On some hydroid remains of lower Palaeozoic age from Monegetta, near Lancefield. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, New Series 2 (31): 388–393.
Chapman, F., and D.E. Thomas. 1936. The Cambrian hydroidea of the Heathcote and Monegeeta districts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, New Series 48: 193–212.
Conway Morris, S., and R.A. Robison. 1988. More soft-bodied animals and algae from the Middle Cambrian of Utah and British Columbia. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 12: 1–48.
Durman, P.N., and N.V. Sennikov. 1993. A new rhabdopleurid hemichordate from the Middle Cambrian of Siberia. Palaeontology 36: 283–296.
Geyer, G. 2010. Cambrian and lowermost Ordovician of the Franconian Forest. In Prague 2010 – The 15th Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage subdivision Working Group, International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy, 4‒11 June 2010, Abstracts and Excursion Guide, eds. Fatka, O., and P. Budil. Czech Geological Survey, Prague: 78–92.
Geyer, G. 2017. Trilobites of the Galgenberg Member (Tannenknock Formation), middle Cambrian Stage 5, Franconian Forest, Germany: A paradigmatic lowermost middle Cambrian West Gondwanan fauna. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 91: 5–70.
Geyer, G. 2019. A comprehensive Cambrian correlation chart. Episodes 42: 321–332. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2019/019026.
Geyer, G., and E. Landing. 2004. A unified Lower–Middle Cambrian chronostratigraphy for West Gondwana. Acta Geologica Polonica 54: 179–218.
Geyer, G., E. Landing, S. Höhn, U. Linnemann, S. Meier, T. Servais, T. Wotte, and H.-G. Herbig. 2019a. Revised Cambrian stratigraphy in the Franconian Forest (Frankenwald), Germany, reveals typical West Gondwana succession in the Saxothuringian Belt. Newsletters on Stratigraphy 54 (2): 377–433. https://doi.org/10.1127/nos/2019/0495.
Geyer, G., M. Valent, and S. Meier. 2019b. Helcionelloids, stenothecoids and hyoliths from the Tannenknock Formation (traditional lower middle Stage 4/Wuliuan boundary interval) of the Franconian Forest, Germany. PalZ 93: 207–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-018-0433-5.
Hall, J. 1847. Palaeontology of New York. Containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower division of the New York System. Vol. 1. 338 pp. Albany: C. Van Benthuysen.
Harvey, T.H.P., J. Ortega-Hernandez, J.-P. Lin, Y.L. Zhao, and N.J. Butterfield. 2012. Burgess Shale-type microfossils from the middle Cambrian Kaili Formation, Guizhou Province, China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57: 423–436.
Hopkinson, J., and C. Lapworth. 1875. Description of the graptolites of the Arenig and Llandeilo rocks of St. Davidh’s. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 31: 631–672.
Howell, B.F. 1963. New Cambrian conchostracans from Wyoming and Newfoundland, brachiopods from Vermont, and worm, hydrozoan and problematicum from Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology 37: 164–167.
Hu, S., B.-D. Erdtmann, M. Steiner, Y. Zhang, F. Zhao, Z. Zhang, and J. Han. 2018. Malongitubus: A possible pterobranch hemichordate from the early Cambrian of South China. Journal of Paleontology 92: 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2017.134.
Johnston, K.J., P.A. Johnston, and W.G. Powell. 2009. A new, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale-type biota, Bolaspidella Zone, Chancellor Basin, southeastern British Columbia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 277: 106–126.
Landing, E. 1996. Avalon—insular continent by the latest Precambrian, In Avalonian and related peri-Gondwanan terranes of the circum-North Atlantic, eds. Nance, R.D., and M. Thompson. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 304: 27–64.
Landing, E., J. Antcliffe, G. Geyer, A. Kouchinsky, A. Andreas, and S.S. Bowser. 2018. Early evolution of colonial animals (Ediacaran evolutionary revolution-Cambrian evolutionary radiation-great Ordovician diversification interval). Earth-Science Reviews 178: 105–135.
Landing, E., G. Geyer, M.D. Schmitz, T. Wotte, and A. Kouchinsky. 2020. (Re)proposal of three Cambrian subsystems and their geochronology. Episodes 44: 273–283. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020088.
Landing, E., J.D. Keppie, D.F. Keppie, G. Geyer, and S.R. Westrop. 2022. Greater Avalonia—latest Ediacaran-Ordovician “peribaltic” terrane bounded by continental margin prisms (“Ganderia”, Harlech Dome, Meguma): Review, tectonic implications, and paleogeography. Earth-Science Reviews 224: 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103863.
Lin, Y.K. 1985. On the discovery of Siberiograptus from North China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 24: 237–242, 290 (In Chinese with English Abstract).
LoDuca, S.T., and A. Kramer. 2014. Graptolites from the wheeler and Marjum formations (Cambrian, Series 3) of Utah. Journal of Paleontology 88: 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1666/12-096.
LoDuca, S.T., J.B. Caron, J.D. Schiffbauer, S. Xiao, and A. Kramer. 2015. A reexamination of Yuknessia from the Cambrian of British Columbia and Utah. Journal of Paleontology 89: 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2014.7.
Maletz, J. 2014. The classification of the Pterobranchia (Cephalodiscida and Graptolithina). Bulletin of Geosciences 89: 477–540.
Maletz, J. 2017. Graptolite Palaeobiology. In Topics in Geobiology. New York: Wiley Blackwell, 366 pp.
Maletz, J., and E. Beli. 2018. Part V, Second Revision, Chapter 15: Subclass Graptolithina and incertae sedis Family Rhabdopleuridae: Introduction and Systematic Descriptions. Treatise Online 101: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17161/to.v0i0.7053.
Maletz, J., and M. Steiner. 2015. Graptolite (Hemichordata, Pterobranchia) preservation and identification in the Cambrian Series 3. Palaeontology 58: 1073–1107.
Maletz, J., M. Steiner, and O. Fatka. 2005. Middle Cambrian pterobranchs and the question: What is a graptolite? Lethaia 38: 73–85.
Mierzejewski, P. 1986. Ultrastructure, taxonomy and affinities of some Ordovician and Silurian organic microfossils. Palaeontologia Polonica 47: 129–220.
Obut, A.M. 1964. Podtip Stomochordata. Stomokhordovye, p. 279–337. In Osnovy paleontogii: Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Pogonophora, Chaetognatha, ed. Orlov, Yu.A. Nedra, Moscow, 379 pp (In Russian).
Öpik, A. 1933. Über einen kambrischen Graptolithen aus Norwegen. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift 13: 8–10.
Quilty, P.G. 1971. Cambrian and Ordovician dendroids and hydroids of Tasmania. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia 17: 171–189.
Ramírez-Guerrero, G.M., and C.B. Cameron. 2021. Systematics of pterobranchs from the Cambrian Period Burgess Shales of Canada and the early evolution of graptolites. Bulletin of Geosciences 96: 1–18.
Rickards, R.B., and P. Durman. 2006. Evolution of the earliest graptolites and other hemichordates. National Museum of Wales, Geological Series 25: 5–92.
Ruedemann, R. 1931. Some new Middle Cambrian fossils from British Columbia. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 79: 1–25.
Ruedemann, R. 1947. Graptolites of North America. Geological Society of America, Memoir 19: 1–652.
Sdzuy, K. 1974. Mittelkambrische Graptolithen aus NW-Spanien. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 48: 110–139.
Song, X., B. Ruthensteiner, M. Lyu, X. Liu, J. Wang, and J. Han. 2021. Advanced Cambrian hydroid fossils (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) extend the medusozoan evolutionary history. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B (Biological Sciences) 288 (1944): 20202939.
Streng, M., and G. Geyer. 2019. Middle Cambrian Bradoriida (Arthropoda) from the Franconian Forest, Germany, with a review of the bradoriids described from West Gondwana and a revision of material from Baltica. PalZ 93: 567–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-019-00448-z.
Thomas, D.E., and Q.J. Henderson. 1945. Some fossils from the Dundas series, Dundas. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 1944: 1–8.
Walcott, C.D. 1919. Middle Cambrian Algae. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology, IV. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 67: 217–260.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank M. Steiner (Berlin) for helpful comments on the specimen. T. Wotte (Freiberg) and an anonymous reviewer provided important suggestions on the manuscript, which is gratefully acknowledged. The specimen was studied during studies supported by research grant GE 549/22-1 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg (Frankfurt am Main) granted access to the type material of Sdzuy (1974) from the Cantabrian Mountains. Examination of the specimens by Backscatter SEM imaging was performed at a JEOL JXA-8800L Superprobe of the Lehrstuhl für Geodynamik und Geomaterialforschung, University of Würzburg.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Michael Amler.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Geyer, G., Landing, E., Meier, S. et al. Oldest known West Gondwanan graptolite: Ovetograptus? sp. (lower Agdzian/lowest Wuliuan; basal Middle Cambrian) of the Franconian Forest, Germany, and review of pre-Furongian graptolithoids. PalZ 97, 677–686 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-022-00627-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-022-00627-5