Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intersecting Barriers to PrEP Awareness and Uptake in Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in Atlanta, GA: a Syndemic Perspective

  • Full length manuscript
  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can sharply reduce HIV transmission risk, yet has not been widely adopted among those at highest risk for HIV, including Black men who have sex with men (BMSM). To better understand the evolving landscape of PrEP uptake in this at-risk population, we sought to examine psychosocial factors associated with PrEP uptake in a sample of BMSM residing in the Atlanta, GA, area.

Method

BMSM were recruited through online social media, LGBT venues, and participant referral, and self-reported demographic and psychosocial information via computer-assisted self-interview. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine psychosocial factors associated with PrEP uptake.

Results

In 293 BMSM, most (N = 260; 88.7%) reported awareness of PrEP yet few (N = 30; 10.1%) reported ever having taken PrEP. BMSM reporting more syndemic conditions were less likely to be current PrEP users (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.96). BMSM reporting recent condomless anal sex (CAS) with a partner met online (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.53; 95% CI: 1.07, 5.93), or who reported having chlamydia (aOR = 8.21; 95% CI: 1.42, 47.67) or STI-related symptoms (aOR = 4.35; 95% CI: 1.32, 14.37) in the past 3 months, or genital warts in their lifetime (aOR = 7.74; 95% CI: 2.47, 24.21) were more likely to have ever used PrEP. Sexual orientation stigma from health care providers was negatively associated with PrEP uptake (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.95) among BMSM reporting recent CAS and multiple partners.

Conclusion

Syndemic and stigma theories may inform strategies for improving PrEP uptake in BMSM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC fact sheet: HIV and African American gay and bisexual men. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/bmsm.html. 2019. Accessed 1/11/2019.

  2. Rubin MS, Colen CG, Link BG. Examination of inequalities in HIV/AIDS mortality in the United States from a fundamental cause perspective. Am.J.Public Health. 2010;100(6):1053–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy ME, Wilton L, Phillips G, et al. Understanding structural barriers to accessing HIV testing and prevention services among black men who have sex with men (BMSM) in the United States. AIDS & Behavior. 2014;18(5):972–96.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matthews DD, Herrick A, Coulter RW, et al. Running backwards: consequences of current HIV incidence rates for the next generation of black MSM in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(1):7–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McCarthy E, Myers JJ, Reeves K, Zack B. Understanding the syndemic connections between HIV and incarceration among African American men, especially African American men who have sex with men. Understanding the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States: Springer; 2016. p. 217–240.

  6. Maksut JL, Eaton LA, Siembida EJ, Fabius CD, Bradley AM. Health care discrimination, sex behavior disclosure, and awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis among Black men who have sex with men. Stigma and Health. 2017;3(4):330.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu H, Mendoza MC, Huang YA, Hayes T, Smith DK, Hoover KW. Uptake of HIV preexposure prophylaxis among commercially insured persons-United States, 2010-2014. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2017;64(2):144–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan E, Moran K, Ryan DT, Mustanski B, Newcomb ME. Threefold increase in PrEP uptake over time with high adherence among young men who have sex with men in Chicago. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(11):3637–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2122-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Smith H, Conway-Washington C, White D, Cherry C. Psychosocial factors related to willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among Black men who have sex with men attending a community event. Sex Health. 2014;11(3):244–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Eaton LA, Matthews DD, Bukowski LA, et al. Elevated HIV prevalence and correlates of PrEP use among a community sample of Black men who have sex with men. JAcquirImmune DeficSyndr. 2018;79(3):339–46.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elopre L, Kudroff K, Westfall AO, Overton ET, Mugavero MJ. The right people, right places, and right practices: disparities in PrEP access among African American men, women and MSM in the Deep South. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74(1):56–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cahill S, Taylor SW, Elsesser SA, Mena L, Hickson D, Mayer KH. Stigma, medical mistrust, and perceived racism may affect PrEP awareness and uptake in black compared to white gay and bisexual men in Jackson, Mississippi and Boston, Massachusetts. AIDS Care. 2017;29(11):1351–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Calabrese SK, Earnshaw VA, Underhill K, Hansen NB, Dovidio JF. The impact of patient race on clinical decisions related to prescribing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): assumptions about sexual risk compensation and implications for access. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):226–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Calabrese SK, Earnshaw VA, Krakower DS, Underhill K, Vincent W, Magnus M, et al. A closer look at racism and heterosexism in medical students’ clinical decision-making related to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): implications for PrEP education. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(4):1122–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Eaton LA, Earnshaw VA, Maksut JL, Thorson KR, Watson RJ, Bauermeister JA. Experiences of stigma and health care engagement among Black MSM newly diagnosed with HIV/STI. J.Behav.Med. 2018:1–9.

  17. Eaton LA, Kalichman SC, Price D, Finneran S, Allen A, Maksut J. Stigma and conspiracy beliefs related to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and interest in using PrEP among black and white men and transgender women who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1236–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Bauermeister J, Smith H, Conway-Washington C. Minimal awareness and stalled uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among at risk, HIV-negative, black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2015;29(8):423–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Stall R, Mills TC, Williamson J, et al. Association of co-occurring psychosocial health problems and increased vulnerability to HIV/AIDS among urban men who have sex with men. AmJPublic Health. 2003;93(6):939–42.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mustanski B, Garofalo R, Herrick A, Donenberg G. Psychosocial health problems increase risk for HIV among urban young men who have sex with men: preliminary evidence of a syndemic in need of attention. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(1):37–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Singer M. A dose of drugs, a touch of violence, a case of AIDS: conceptualizing the SAVA syndemic. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology. 2000;28(1):13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blashill AJ, Brady JP, Rooney BM, Rodriguez-Diaz CE, Horvath KJ, Blumenthal J, et al. Syndemics and the PrEP cascade: results from a sample of young Latino men who have sex with men. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2020;49(1):125–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chandler CJ, Bukowski LA, Matthews DD, Hawk ME, Markovic N, Stall RD, et al. Understanding the impact of a syndemic on the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in a community-based sample of behaviorally PrEP-eligible BMSM in the United States. AIDS Care. 2020;32(5):551–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report, 20172018.

  25. Wilson PA, Yoshikawa H. Improving access to health care among African-American, Asian and Pacific Islander, and Latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. In: Meyer IHNM, editor. The health of sexual minorities. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 607–37.

    Google Scholar 

  26. LaVeist T. Measuring trust in health care: medical mistrust index 2.1. 2013. http://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/johns-hopkinscenter-for-health-disparities-solutions/Projects/MMT.html. Accessed April 14 2019.

  27. Halkitis PN, Zade DD, Shrem M, Marmor M. Beliefs about HIV non-infection and risky sexual behavior among MSM. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16(5):448–58. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.16.5.448.48739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch.Intern.Med. 1998;158(16):1789–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Björgvinsson T, Kertz SJ, Bigda-Peyton JS, McCoy KL, Aderka IM. Psychometric properties of the CES-D-10 in a psychiatric sample. Assessment. 2013;20(4):429–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Delacre M, Lakens D, Leys C. Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology. 2017;30(1).

  32. Derrick B, Toher D, White P. Why Welch’s test is type I error robust. The Quantitative Methods in Psychology. 2016;12(1):30–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Behrens T, Taeger D, Wellmann J, Keil U. Different methods to calculate effect estimates in cross-sectional studies. Methods Inf Med. 2004;43(5):505–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. 2017.

  35. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2019;Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org.

  36. Palar K, Laraia B, Tsai AC, Johnson MO, Weiser SD. Food insecurity is associated with HIV, sexually transmitted infections and drug use among men in the United States. Aids. 2016;30(9):1457–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0000000000001095.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Burch LS, Smith CJ, Phillips AN, Johnson MA, Lampe FC. Socioeconomic status and response to antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a literature review. Aids. 2016;30(8):1147–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Friedman MR, Sang JM, Bukowski LA, Chandler CJ, Egan JE, Eaton LA, et al. Prevalence and correlates of PrEP awareness and use among Black men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2019;23:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02446-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Watson RJ, Fish JN, Allen A, Eaton L. Sexual identity disclosure and awareness of HIV prevention methods among Black men who have sex with men. Journal of sex research. 2018;55(8):975–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1375452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Beymer MR, Weiss RE, Bolan RK, Rudy ET, Bourque LB, Rodriguez JP, et al. Sex on demand: geosocial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(7):567–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. DeVost MA, Beymer MR, Weiss RE, Shover CL, Bolan RK. App-based sexual partner seeking and sexually transmitted infection outcomes: a cross-sectional study of HIV-negative men who have sex with men attending a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Los Angeles, California. SexTransmDis. 2018;45(6):394–9.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Badal HJ, Stryker JE, DeLuca N, Purcell DW. Swipe right: dating website and app use among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(4):1265–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lehmiller JJ, Ioerger M. Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86603.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Eaton LA, Maksut JL, Gamarel KE, Siembida EJ, Driffin DD, Baldwin R. Online sex partner meeting venues as a risk factor for testing HIV positive among a community-based sample of black men who have sex with men. Sex.Transm.Dis. 2016;43(6):360–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Holloway I, Dougherty R, Gildner J, et al. PrEP uptake, adherence, and discontinuation among California YMSM using geosocial networking applications. J.Acquir.Immune Defic.Syndr. 2017;74(1):15–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kipke MD, Weiss G, Ramirez M, Dorey F, Ritt-Olson A, Iverson E, et al. Club drug use in Los Angeles among young men who have sex with men. Subst.Use Misuse. 2007;42(11):1723–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Hambrick HR, Park SH, Palamar JJ, Estreet A, Schneider JA, Duncan DT. Use of poppers and HIV risk behaviours among men who have sex with men in Paris, France: an observational study. Sex Health. 2018;15:370–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Rolle C-P, Rosenberg ES, Siegler AJ, Sanchez TH, Luisi N, Weiss K, et al. Challenges in translating PrEP interest into uptake in an observational study of young Black MSM. J.Acquir.Immune Defic.Syndr. 2017;76(3):250–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hightow-Weidman LB, Magnus M, Beauchamp G, Hurt CB, Shoptaw S, Emel L, et al. Incidence and correlates of STIs among Black men who have sex with men participating in the HPTN 073 PrEP study. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:1597–604.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Cohen MS. Sexually transmitted diseases enhance HIV transmission: no longer a hypothesis. Lancet. 1998;351(Suppl 3):5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Weiss G, Smith D, Ye J, Newman S, Kitlas A, editors. Implementing PrEP in STD clinics: findings from a 2015 assessment of local health department engagement in PrEP implementation. 2016 national STD prevention conference. Atlanta: CDC; 2016.

  52. Hojilla JC, Vlahov D, Crouch P-C, Dawson-Rose C, Freeborn K, Carrico A. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake and retention among men who have sex with men in a community-based sexual health clinic. AIDS Behav 2017:1–4.

  53. Desrosiers A, Levy M, Dright A, Zumer M, Jallah N, Kuo I, et al. A randomized controlled pilot study of a culturally-tailored counseling intervention to increase uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among young Black men who have sex with men in Washington, DC. AIDS and Behavior. 2019;23(1):105–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Tan DH, Leon-Carlyle M, Mills R, Moses E, Carvalhal A. Self-administered screening for syndemic mental health problems should be routinely implemented among MSM PrEP users. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health. 2016;20(1):13–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Patel RR, Mena L, Nunn A, McBride T, Harrison LC, Oldenburg CE, et al. Impact of insurance coverage on utilization of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0178737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Whitfield TH, John SA, Rendina HJ, Grov C, Parsons JT. Why I quit pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)? A mixed-method study exploring reasons for PrEP discontinuation and potential re-initiation among gay and bisexual men. AIDS Behav. 2018:1–10.

  57. Van de Mortel TF. Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, The. 2008;25(4):40.

  58. McNeely J, Strauss SM, Rotrosen J, Ramautar A, Gourevitch MN. Validation of an audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) version of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST) in primary care patients. Addiction. 2016;111(2):233–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Morrison-Beedy D, Carey MP, Tu X. Accuracy of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) and self-administered questionnaires for the assessment of sexual behavior. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(5):541–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Gribble JN, Miller HG, Cooley PC, Catania JA, Pollack L, Turner CF. The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men. SubstUse Misuse. 2000;35(6–8):869–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all those who participated in this study, without whom this project would not have been possible.

Funding

This study was funded by a research grant from NIMH (R01-MH109409). Matthew Sullivan’s contributions to this work were supported by a training grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (T32-MH074387). Lisa Eaton is supported by research grants from NIH (R01-MH109409, R01-DA043068, and R34-MH115798).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Road, Unit 1020, Storrs, CT, 06269-1020, USA

    Matthew C. Sullivan

  2. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

    Lisa A. Eaton

Authors
  1. Matthew C. Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa A. Eaton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew C. Sullivan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sullivan, M.C., Eaton, L.A. Intersecting Barriers to PrEP Awareness and Uptake in Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in Atlanta, GA: a Syndemic Perspective. Int.J. Behav. Med. 28, 349–359 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-020-09925-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-020-09925-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation