Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive factors of successful sperm retrieval on microdissection testicular sperm extraction in Japanese men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate retrospectively the outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and to identify the parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval in this cohort of patients.

Methods

After excluding patients with normal testicular volume and serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level who received conventional TESE, this study included 329 consecutive NOA patients undergoing micro-TESE at our institution. The significance of several factors, including age, testicular volume, etiology and serum levels of FSH, luteinizing hormone (LH) and serum testosterone (T), as predictors of successful sperm retrieval, was evaluated.

Results

Of the 329 men included in this series, 246 (74.8 %), 40 (12.2 %), and 43 (13.1 %) were pathologically diagnosed with Sertoli cell only, maturation arrest, and hypospermatogenesis, respectively. Spermatozoa were retrieved in 97 (29.5 %) of these 329 men by micro-TESE. Older age and non-idiopathic etiology were significantly associated with the probability of successful sperm retrieval; however, there were no significant effects of testicular volume as well as serum levels of FSH, LH, and T on sperm retrieval outcome. Furthermore, Johnsen score of the micro-TESE specimen showed a significant association with whether spermatozoa were successfully retrieved. Univariate analysis of preoperative parameters identified older age and non-idiopathic etiology as significant predictors of successful sperm retrieval, of which only etiology appeared to be independently related to successful sperm retrieval on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Spermatozoa are significantly less likely to be successfully retrieved by micro-TESE in men with idiopathic azoospermia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ishikawa T, Nose R, Yamaguchi K, et al. Learning curves of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1008–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Okada H, Dobashi M, Yamazaki T, et al. Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2002;168:1063–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramasamy R, Yagan N, Schlegel PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology. 2005;65:1190–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y, et al. Prediction of successful outcome of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2004;172:1944–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bromage SJ, Falconer DA, Lieberman BA, et al. Sperm retrieval rates in subgroups of primary azoospermic males. Eur Urol. 2007;51:534–40 discussion 39-40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tunc L, Kırac M, Gurocak S, Yucel A, Kupeli B, Alkıbay T, Bozkirli I. Can serum Inhibin B and FSH levels, testicular histology and volume predict the outcome of testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia? Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38(3–4):629–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hopps CV, Mielnik A, Goldstein M, et al. Detection of sperm in men with Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa AZFb and AZFc regions. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1660–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandell RA, Mielnik A, Liotta D, et al. AZFb deletions predict the absence of spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction: preliminary report of a prognostic genetic test. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2812–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez M, BERNABÉS M, Gomez E, et al. Screening for AZF deletion in a large series of severely impaired spermatogenesis patients. J Androl. 2000;21:651–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reijo R, Alagappan RK, Page D, et al. Severe oligozoospermia resulting from deletions of azoospermia factor gene on Y chromosome. Lancet. 1996;347:1290–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klingmuller D, Haidl G. Inhibin B in men with normal and disturbed spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2376–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiraishi K. Hormonal therapy for non-obstructive azoospermia: basic and clinical perspectives. Reprod Med Biol. 2015;14(2):65–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell V, Robin G, Boitrelle F, et al. Correlation between testicular sperm extraction outcomes and clinical, endocrine and testicular histology parameters in 120 azoospermic men with normal serum FSH levels. Int J Androl. 2011;34:299–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ziaee SA, Ezzatnegad M, Nowroozi M, et al. Prediction of successful sperm retrieval in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Urol J. 2006;3:92–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Su L-M, Palermo GD, Goldstein M, Veeck LL, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia: testicular histology can predict success of sperm retrieval. J urol. 1999;161(1):112–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seo JT, Ko WJ. Predictive factors of successful testicular sperm recovery in non-obstructive azoospermia patients. Int J Androl. 2001;24:306–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hassan MA, Killick SR. Effect of male age on fertility: evidence for the decline in male fertility with increasing age. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(Suppl 3):1520–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramasamy R, Trivedi NN, Reifsnyder JE, et al. Age does not adversely affect sperm retrieval in men undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:653–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Nagy P, et al. Are there any predictive factors for successful testicular sperm recovery in azoospermic patients? Hum Reprod. 1997;12(1):80–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noritoshi Enatsu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Noritoshi Enatsu, Hideaki Miyake, Koji Chiba and Masato Fujisawa declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human right statements and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethical committee and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in this study.

Animal studies

This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Enatsu, N., Miyake, H., Chiba, K. et al. Predictive factors of successful sperm retrieval on microdissection testicular sperm extraction in Japanese men. Reprod Med Biol 15, 29–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-015-0212-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-015-0212-x

Keywords

Navigation