Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate retrospectively the outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and to identify the parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval in this cohort of patients.
Methods
After excluding patients with normal testicular volume and serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level who received conventional TESE, this study included 329 consecutive NOA patients undergoing micro-TESE at our institution. The significance of several factors, including age, testicular volume, etiology and serum levels of FSH, luteinizing hormone (LH) and serum testosterone (T), as predictors of successful sperm retrieval, was evaluated.
Results
Of the 329 men included in this series, 246 (74.8 %), 40 (12.2 %), and 43 (13.1 %) were pathologically diagnosed with Sertoli cell only, maturation arrest, and hypospermatogenesis, respectively. Spermatozoa were retrieved in 97 (29.5 %) of these 329 men by micro-TESE. Older age and non-idiopathic etiology were significantly associated with the probability of successful sperm retrieval; however, there were no significant effects of testicular volume as well as serum levels of FSH, LH, and T on sperm retrieval outcome. Furthermore, Johnsen score of the micro-TESE specimen showed a significant association with whether spermatozoa were successfully retrieved. Univariate analysis of preoperative parameters identified older age and non-idiopathic etiology as significant predictors of successful sperm retrieval, of which only etiology appeared to be independently related to successful sperm retrieval on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Spermatozoa are significantly less likely to be successfully retrieved by micro-TESE in men with idiopathic azoospermia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ishikawa T, Nose R, Yamaguchi K, et al. Learning curves of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1008–11.
Okada H, Dobashi M, Yamazaki T, et al. Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2002;168:1063–7.
Ramasamy R, Yagan N, Schlegel PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology. 2005;65:1190–4.
Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y, et al. Prediction of successful outcome of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2004;172:1944–7.
Bromage SJ, Falconer DA, Lieberman BA, et al. Sperm retrieval rates in subgroups of primary azoospermic males. Eur Urol. 2007;51:534–40 discussion 39-40.
Tunc L, Kırac M, Gurocak S, Yucel A, Kupeli B, Alkıbay T, Bozkirli I. Can serum Inhibin B and FSH levels, testicular histology and volume predict the outcome of testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia? Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38(3–4):629–35.
Hopps CV, Mielnik A, Goldstein M, et al. Detection of sperm in men with Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa AZFb and AZFc regions. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1660–5.
Brandell RA, Mielnik A, Liotta D, et al. AZFb deletions predict the absence of spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction: preliminary report of a prognostic genetic test. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2812–5.
Martinez M, BERNABÉS M, Gomez E, et al. Screening for AZF deletion in a large series of severely impaired spermatogenesis patients. J Androl. 2000;21:651–5.
Reijo R, Alagappan RK, Page D, et al. Severe oligozoospermia resulting from deletions of azoospermia factor gene on Y chromosome. Lancet. 1996;347:1290–3.
Klingmuller D, Haidl G. Inhibin B in men with normal and disturbed spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2376–8.
Shiraishi K. Hormonal therapy for non-obstructive azoospermia: basic and clinical perspectives. Reprod Med Biol. 2015;14(2):65–72.
Mitchell V, Robin G, Boitrelle F, et al. Correlation between testicular sperm extraction outcomes and clinical, endocrine and testicular histology parameters in 120 azoospermic men with normal serum FSH levels. Int J Androl. 2011;34:299–305.
Ziaee SA, Ezzatnegad M, Nowroozi M, et al. Prediction of successful sperm retrieval in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Urol J. 2006;3:92–6.
Su L-M, Palermo GD, Goldstein M, Veeck LL, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia: testicular histology can predict success of sperm retrieval. J urol. 1999;161(1):112–6
Seo JT, Ko WJ. Predictive factors of successful testicular sperm recovery in non-obstructive azoospermia patients. Int J Androl. 2001;24:306–10.
Hassan MA, Killick SR. Effect of male age on fertility: evidence for the decline in male fertility with increasing age. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(Suppl 3):1520–7.
Ramasamy R, Trivedi NN, Reifsnyder JE, et al. Age does not adversely affect sperm retrieval in men undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:653–5.
Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Nagy P, et al. Are there any predictive factors for successful testicular sperm recovery in azoospermic patients? Hum Reprod. 1997;12(1):80–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Noritoshi Enatsu, Hideaki Miyake, Koji Chiba and Masato Fujisawa declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human right statements and informed consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethical committee and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in this study.
Animal studies
This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
About this article
Cite this article
Enatsu, N., Miyake, H., Chiba, K. et al. Predictive factors of successful sperm retrieval on microdissection testicular sperm extraction in Japanese men. Reprod Med Biol 15, 29–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-015-0212-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-015-0212-x