Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Benign penile skin anomalies in children: a primer for pediatricians

  • Review article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Abnormalities involving the skin coverage of the penis are difficult to define, but they can significantly alter penile appearance, and be a cause of parental concern.

Data sources

The present review was based on a nonsystematic search of the English language medical literature using a combination of key words including "penile skin anomalies" and the specific names of the different conditions.

Results

Conditions were addressed in the following order, those mainly affecting the prepuce (phimosis, balanitis xerotica obliterans, balanitis, paraphimosis), those which alter penile configuration (inconspicuous penis and penile torsion), and lastly focal lesions (cysts, nevi and vascular lesions). Most of these anomalies are congenital, have no or minimal influence on urinary function, and can be detected on clinical examination. Spontaneous improvement is possible. In the majority of cases undergoing surgery, the potential psychological implications of genital malformation on patient development are the main reason for treatment, and the age generally recommended for surgery is after 12 months of age.

Conclusion

This review provides the pediatrician with a handy tool to identify the most common penile skin anomalies, counsel parents adequately, make sensible and evidence based choices for management, and recognize complications or untoward outcomes in patients undergoing surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borer JG, Retik AB. Current trends in hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 1999;26:15–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Castagnetti M, El-Ghoneimi A. Surgical management of primary severe hypospadias in children: systematic 20-year review. J Urol 2010;184:1469–1474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ebert AK, Reutter H, Ludwig M, Rösch WH. The exstrophyepispadias complex. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2009;4:23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics. Timing of elective surgery on the genitalia of male children with particular reference to the risks, benefits, and psychological effects of surgery and anesthesia. Pediatrics 1996;97:590–594.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yang C, Liu X, Wei GH. Foreskin development in 10 421 Chinese boys aged 0–18 years. World J Pediatr 2009;5:312–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsieh TF, Chang CH, Chang SS. Foreskin development before adolescence in 2149 schoolboys. Int J Urol 2006;13:968–970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Male circumcision. Pediatrics 2012;130:e756–e785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang SS, Tsai YC, Wu CC, Liu SP, Wang CC. Highly potent and moderately potent topical steroids are effective in treating phimosis: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 2005;173:1361–1363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Letendre J, Barrieras D, Franc-Guimond J, Abdo A, Houle AM. Topical triamcinolone for persistent phimosis. J Urol 2009;182:1759–1763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuehhas FE, Miernik A, Sevcenco S, Tosev G, Weibl P, Schoenthaler M, et al. Predictive power of objectivation of phimosis grade on outcomes of topical 0.1% betamethasone treatment of phimosis. Urology 2012;80:412–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dessanti A, Ginesu G, Iannuccelli M, Balata A. Phimosis. Preputial plasty using transversal widening on the dorsal side with EMLA local anesthetic cream. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:713–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nieuwenhuijs JL, Dik P, Klijn AJ, de Jong TP. Y-V plasty of the foreskin as an alternative to circumcision for surgical treatment of phimosis during childhood. J Pediatr Urol 2007;3:45–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceylan K, Burhan K, Yilmaz Y, Can S, Kus A, Mustafa G. Severe complications of circumcision: an analysis of 48 cases. J Pediatr Urol 2007;3:32–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cathcart P, Nuttall M, van der Meulen J, Emberton M, Kenny SE. Trends in paediatric circumcision and its complications in England between 1997 and 2003. Br J Surg 2006;93:885–890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiss A, Király L, Kutasy B, Merksz M. High incidence of balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys with phimosis: prospective 10-year study. Pediatr Dermatol 2005;22:305–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bochove-Overgaauw DM, Gelders W, De Vylder AM. Routine biopsies in pediatric circumcision: (non) sense? J Pediatr Urol 2009;5:178–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jayakumar S, Antao B, Bevington O, Furness P, Ninan GK. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children and its incidence under the age of 5 years. J Pediatr Urol 2012;8:272–275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Celis S, Reed F, Murphy F, Adams S, Gillick J, Abdelhafeez AH, et al. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children and adolescents: a literature review and clinical series. J Pediatr Urol 2014;10:34–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gargollo PC, Kozakewich HP, Bauer SB, Borer JG, Peters CA, Retik AB, et al. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys. J Urol 2005;174:1409–1412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz RH, Rushton HG. Acute balanoposthitis in young boys. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996;15:176–177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith GA, Sharma V, Knapp JF, Shields BJ. The summer penile syndrome: seasonal acute hypersensitivity reaction caused by chigger biteson the penis. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998;14:116–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gomes CM, Ribeiro-Filho L, Giron AM, Mitre AI, Figueira ER, Arap S. Genital trauma due to animal bites. J Urol 2001;165:80–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Bahnasawy MS, El-Sherbiny MT. Paediatric penile trauma. BJU Int 2002;90:92–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Badawy H, Soliman A, Ouf A, Hammad A, Orabi S, Hanno A. Progressive hair coil penile tourniquet syndrome: multicenter experience with 25 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:1514–1518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tiengo C, Castagnetti M, Garolla A, Rigamonti W, Foresta C, Azzena B. High-voltage electrical burn of the genitalia, perineum, and upper extremities: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. J Burn Care Res 2011;32:e168–e171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Djordjevic ML, Bumbasirevic MZ, Krstic Z, Bizic MR, Stojanovic BZ, Miocinovic R, et al. Severe penile injuries in children and adolescents: reconstruction modalities and outcomes. Urology 2014;83:465–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mackway-Jones K, Teece S. Best evidence topic reports. Ice, pins, or sugar to reduce paraphimosis. Emerg Med J 2004;21:77–78.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Anand A, Kapoor S. Mannitol for paraphimosis reduction. Urol Int 2013;90:106–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. DeVries CR, Miller AK, Packer MG. Reduction of paraphimosis with hyaluronidase. Urology 1996;48:464–465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar V, Javle P. Modified puncture technique for reduction of paraphymosis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2001;83:126–127.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Choe JM. Paraphimosis: current treatment options. Am Fam Physician 2000;62:2623–2626, 2628.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Raman SR, Kate V, Ananthakrishnan N. Coital paraphimosis causing penile necrosis. Emerg Med J 2008;25:454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zimmermann EF, Woodward MN. Isolated preputial reconstruction in distal hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol 2014;10:399. e1–399.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Castagnetti M. Commentary to "Foreskin retractility following hypospadias repair with preputioplasty—medium term outcomes". J Pediatr Urol 2013;9:1209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kallampallil J, Hennayake S. Foreskin retractility following hypospadias repair with preputioplasty—medium term outcomes. J Pediatr Urol 2013;9:1204–1209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gray J, Boston VE. Glanular reconstruction and preputioplasty repair for distal hypospadias: a unique day casemethod to avoid urethral stenting and preserve the prepuce. BJU Int 2003;91:268–270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Klijn AJ, Dik P, de Jong TP. Results of preputial reconstruction in 77 boys with distal hypospadias. J Urol 2001;165:1255–1257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hatipoglu N, Kurtoglu S. Micropenis: etiology, diagnosis and treatment approaches. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2013;5:217–223.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J, Bushnick PN, Firlit CF. Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique tocorrect the disorder. J Urol 1986;136:268–271.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Brien A, Shapiro AM, Frank JD. Phimosis or congenital megaprepuce? Br J Urol 1994;73:719–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Eroglu E, Bastian OW, Ozkan HC, Yorukalp OE, Goksel AK. Buried penis after newborn circumcision. J Urol 2009;181:1841–1843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Crawford BS. Buried penis. Br J Plast Surg 1977;30:96–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Borsellino A, Spagnoli A, Vallasciani S, Martini L, Ferro F. Surgical approach to concealed penis: technical refi nements and outcome. Urology 2007;69:1195–1198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Summerton DJ, McNally J, Denny AJ, Malone PS. Congenital megaprepuce: an emerging condition—how to recognize and treat it. BJU Int 2000;86:519–522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Masih BK, Brosman SA. Webbed penis. J Urol 1974;111:690–692.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Perlmutter AD, Chamberlain JW. Webbed penis without chordee. J Urol 1972;107:320–321.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Blalock HJ, Vemulakonda V, Ritchey ML, Ribbeck M. Outpatient management of phimosis following newborn circumcision. J Urol 2003;169:2332–2334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sivakumar B, Brown AA, Kangesu L. Circumcision in "buried penis"—a cautionary tale. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004;86:35–37.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hadidi AT. Buried penis: classification surgical approach. J Pediatr Surg 2014;49:374–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fisher PC, Park JM. Penile torsion repair using dorsal dartos fl ap rotation. J Urol 2004;171:1903–1904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sarkis PE, Sadasivam M. Incidence and predictive factors of isolated neonatal penile glanular torsion. J Pediatr Urol 2007;3:495–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Shaeer O. Torsion of the penis in adults: prevalence and surgical correction. J Sex Med 2008;5:735–739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Culp OS. Struggles and triumphs with hypospadias and associated anomalies: review of 400 cases. J Urol 1966;96:339–351.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pomerantz P, Hanna M, Levitt S, Kogan S. Isolated torsion of penis. Report of 6 cases. Urology 1978;1:37–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Snodgrass W. Editorial comment. J Urol 2009;182:290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhou L, Mei H, Hwang AH, Xie HW, Hardy BE. Penile torsion repair by suturing tunica albuginea to the pubic periosteum. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:e7–e9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Snow BW. Penile torsion correction by diagonal corporal plication sutures. Int Braz J Urol 2009;35:56–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fisher PC, Park JM. Penile torsion repair using dorsal dartos fl ap rotation. J Urol 2004;171:1903–1904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bauer R, Kogan BA. Modern technique for penile torsion repair. J Urol 2009;182:286–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bhat A, Bhat MP, Saxena G. Correction of penile torsion by mobilization of urethral plate and urethra. J Pediatr Urol 2009;5:451–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Aldaqadossi HA, Elgamal SA, Seif Elnasr MK. Dorsal dartos flap rotation versus suturing tunica albuginea to the pubic periosteum for correction of penile torsion: a prospective randomized study. J Pediatr Urol 2013;9:643–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Glenn JF, Anderson EE. Surgical correction of incomplete penoscrotal transposition. J Urol 1973;110:603–605.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Pinke LA, Rathbun SR, Husmann DA, Kramer SA. Penoscrotal transposition: review of 53 patients. J Urol 2001;166:1865–1868.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Amukele SA, Stock JA, Hanna MK. Management and outcome of complex hypospadias repairs. J Urol 2005;174:1540–1542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tempark T, Wu T, Singer C, Shwayder T. Dermatological complications of circumcision: lesson learned from cases in a pediatric dermatology practice. Pediatr Dermatol 2013;30:519–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Willis HL, Snow BW, Cartwright PC, Wallis MC, Oottamasathien S, de Vries C. Parameatal urethral cysts in prepubertal males. J Urol 2011;185:1042–1045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Canali R, Angelini L, Castagnetti M, Zhapa E, Rigamonti W. Scrotal dermoid extending to the posterior urethra through a corpus cavernosum in a child. J Pediatr Surg 2012;47:1618–1621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Yuan X, Wei G, Lin T, He D, Li X. Uncommon pediatric painless scrotal masses: a puzzle of pediatricians and urologists. Int Urol Nephrol 2010;42:979–984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Papali AC, Alpert SA, Edmondson JD, Maizels M, Yerkes E, Hagerty J, et al. A review of pediatric glans malformations: a handy clinical reference. J Urol 2008;180:1737–1742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bittencourt FV, Marghoob AA, Kopf AW, Koenig KL, Bart RS. Large congenital melanocytic nevi and the risk for development of malignant melanoma and neurocutaneous melanocytosis. Pediatrics 2000;106:736–741.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Price HN, Schaffer JV. Congenital melanocytic nevi-when to worry and how to treat: Facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 2010;28:293–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Leavitt DA, Hottinger DG, Reed RC, Shukla AR. A case series of genital vascular anomalies in children and their management: lessons learned. Urology 2012;80:914–918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kulungowski AM, Schook CC, Alomari AI, Vogel AM, Mulliken JB, Fishman SJ. Vascular anomalies of the male genitalia. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:1214–1221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Padua, Italy

    Marco Castagnetti, Mike Leonard, Luis Guerra, Ciro Esposito & Marcello Cimador

  2. Section of Pediatric Urology, Urology Unit, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy

    Marco Castagnetti

  3. Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Mike Leonard & Luis Guerra

  4. Department of Pediatrics, Federico II University of Naples, Padua, Italy

    Ciro Esposito

  5. Section of Pediatric Urology and Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department for Mother & Child Care and Urology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

    Marcello Cimador

Authors
  1. Marco Castagnetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mike Leonard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luis Guerra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ciro Esposito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marcello Cimador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Castagnetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castagnetti, M., Leonard, M., Guerra, L. et al. Benign penile skin anomalies in children: a primer for pediatricians. World J Pediatr 11, 316–323 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-015-0015-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-015-0015-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation