Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An integrated approach of the analytic network process and barometer model mapping of human settlement sustainability in Ardebil Province, Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this research is to evaluate the economic, social, and environmental aspects for sustainability assessment in Ardabil Province, Iran. We applied an analytic network process (ANP) approach to 10 economic indices, 16 indicators, and 24 environmental indices to reveal the relative importance of each indicator. The economic and social aspects yielded reasonably high sustainability values while the environmental aspects turned out to have a low sustainability value. In terms of human well-being, of the ten counties studied, the city of Sareyn turned out to be unsustainable, eight cities yielded average levels of sustainability, and the city of Ardebil reached an almost sustainable level. In relation to the ecosystem well-being, seven counties were almost unsustainable, while the two counties Pars Abad and Meshkinshahr average level of sustainability and the city of Ardebil reached an almost sustainable level. Results of this research outlined that an integrated approach of ANP and barometer model can be applied sustainable modeling efficiently. These results are discussed with decision makers and authorities in Ardebil provinces for the purpose of regional planning and sustainable development. In addition, results derived from this research can make an important contribution to the further development of political sustainability related decisions in particular. The main novelty of this research is to present a new and efficient approach for sustainability assessment tasks by means of integrating the analytic network process and barometer model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedi Gheshlaghi H, Feizizadeh B (2021) GIS-based ensemble modelling of fuzzy system and bivariate statistics as a tool to improve the accuracy of landslide susceptibility mapping. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04673-1

  • Aragonés-Beltrán P, Aznar J, Ferrís-Oñate J, García-Melón M (2008) Valuation of urban industrial land: an analytic network process approach. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):322–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo GC, Pimenta HCD, Reis LMM, Campos LMS (2013) Diagnosis of sustainability in the Brazilian city of Touros: an application of the barometer of sustainability. HOLOS 2:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo G, Vivier F, Labaja JJ, Hartley D, Ponzo A (2017) Assessing the impacts of tourism on the world’s largest fish Rhincodon typus at Panaon Island, Southern Leyte, Philippines. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 27(5):986–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asghar Zarrabi A, Rezaei M (2013) "Planning for sustainable urban development. Scientific” - Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR) 85(22): 13–17

  • Araújo GC, Pimenta HCD, Reis LMM, Campos LMS (2013) Diagnosis of sustanbility in the Brazilian city of Touros, an application of the brometer of sustanbility. Holos 29(2):161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arodudu OT, Helming K, Wiggering H, Voinov A (2017) Towards a more holistic sustainability assessment framework for agro-bioenergy systems — a review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 62:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J (2012) Sustainability assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal 30:53–62

  • Bossel H (1999) Indicators for sustainable development: theory, method, applications, international institute for sustainable development, Canada

  • Boggia A, Massei G, Pasi E, Rochi L, Paolotti L, Attard M (2018) Spatial multicriteria analysis for sustainability assessment: a new model for decision making. Land Use Policy 71:281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgass MJ, Halpern BS, Nicholson E, Milner-Gulland EJ (2017) Navigating uncertainty in environmental composite indicators. Ecol Indicat 75:268e278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behboudi D, Mohamadzade P, Feizizadeh B, Pooranvari A (2018) Multi-criteria based readiness assessment for developing spatial data infrastructures in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. GI Forum 2:322–333. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2018_02_s322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringera Ch, Jochem P (2007) Measuring the immeasurable—a survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics 63(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracolici MF, Cuffaro M, Lacagnina V (2018) Assessment of sustainable well-being in the italian regions: an activity analysis model. Ecol Econ 143:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Yang Y (2011) A fuzzy ANP-based approach to evaluate region agricultural drought risk. Procedia Engineering 23:822–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhang D (2020) Evaluation of city sustainability using multi-criteria decision-making considering interaction among criteria in Liaoning province China. Sustainable Cities and Society 59:102211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edalatpour MA, Mirzapour Al-e-hashem SMJ, Karimi B, Bahli B (2018) Investigation on a novel sustainable model for waste management in megacities: a case study in Teheran municipality. Sustain Cities Soc 36:286–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergu D, Kou G, Shi Y, Shi Y (2014) Analytic network process in risk assessment and decision analysis. Comput Oper Res 42:58–74

  • Feizizadeh B, Omrazadeh D, Ronag Z, Sharifi A, Blaschke T, Lakes T (2021a) A scenario-based approach for urban water management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and a case study for the Tabriz metropolitan area. Iran Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Ronagh Z, Pourmoradian S, Gheshlaghi H, Lakes T, Blaschke T (2021b) An efficient GIS-based approach for sustainability assessment of urban drinking water consumption patterns: a study in Tabriz city, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102584

  • Farahani H (2003) “Sustainability Assessment in Rural Areas Case Study: Tafresh Town”, Ph.D thesis, Department of geography and rural planning, faculty of geography, supervisor: Rahmatollah Farhoudi, University of Tehran

  • Fang C, Cui X, Li G, Bao C, Wang Z, Ma H, Ren Y (2019) Modeling regional sustainable development scenarios using the urbanization and eco-environment coupler: case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China. Sci Total Environ 689:820–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2013a) Land suitability analysis for Tabriz County, Iran: a multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS. J Environ Planning Manage 56:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2013b) GIS- Multi Criteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin. Iran. Nat Hazards 65(3):2105–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2014) An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based Multi Criteria landslide susceptibility mapping. Geogr Inf Sci 28(3):610–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T, Nazmfar H, Rezaei Moghaddam M (2013a) Landslide susceptibility mapping for the Urmia Lake basin, Iran: a multi criteria evaluation approach using GIS. Int J Environ Res 7(2):319–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T, Roodposhti MS (2013b) Integrating GIS based fuzzy set theory in multi criteria evaluation methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Int J Geoinform 9(3):49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Jankowski P, Blaschke T (2014) A GIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Comput Geosci 64:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Kienberger S (2017) Spatially explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for multi criteria-based vulnerability assessment. J Environ Plan Manag 1e23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1269643

  • Feizizadeh B, Shadman Roodposhti M, Blaschke T, Aryal J (2017) Comparing support vector machine kernel functions for GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Arabian Geoscience 10(5):122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B (2018) A novel approach of fuzzy Dempster-Shafer theory for spatial uncertainty analysis and accuracy assessment of object-based image classification. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 15(1):18–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbanzadeh O, Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2018) Multi-criteria risk evaluation by integrating an analytical network process approach into GIS-based sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 9(1):127–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbanzadeh O, Pourmoradian S, Blaschke T, Feizizadeh B (2019) Mapping potential nature-based tourism areas by applying GIS-decision making systems in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. J Ecotourism 18(3):261–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamepour M (2013) “Environmental planning and urban and regional sustainability (principles, methods and indicators of territorial sustainability environment)”, Publications, the Center for Human Sciences Research and Development.

  • Kemmler A, Spreng D (2007) Energy indicators for tracking sustainability in developing countries. Energy Policy 35(4):2466–2480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkaya G, Erdin C (2020) Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities through a hybrid MCDM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS technique. Heliyon 6(10):e05052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omarzadeh D, Pourmoradian, S., Feizizadeh, B., Khallaghi, H., Sharifi, A., Valizadeh Kamran, K., 2021.A GIS-based multiple ecotourism sustainability assessment of West Azerbaijan Province, Iran. J Environ Plan Manag, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1887827.

  • Handoh IC, Hidaka T (2010) On the timescales of sustainability and futurability. Futures 42(7):743–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayati Z, Seidayi SE, Hedayatollah N (2014) Analysis of effective indicators in rural sustainability (case study: Falavarjan County in Isfahan Province). Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 3(9):123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiremath RB, Balachandra P, Kumar B, Bansode SH, Murali J (2013) Indicator-based urban sustainability-a review. Energy Sustain Dev 17:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Wang J, Jing Z, Tang Q (2020) Measurement of sustainable transformation capability of resource-based cities based on fuzzy membership function: a case study of Shanxi Province, China. Res Pol 68:101739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoudi V, Majed V (2012) Planning sustainable urban development with an approach to core planning (a proposal for planning sustainable urban development in Tehran). Rahbord 21(64):43–72

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellanad B, Kishita Y, Yoshizawa G, Yamaguchi Y, Aoki K, Handoh IC (2014) Assessing sustainable regional energy systems: a case study of Kansai, Japan. Procedia Environ Sci 20:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchooli F, Sadeghi SH, Darvishan AK, Strobl J (2021) Multi-dimensional assessment of watershed condition using a newly developed barometer of sustainability. Science of the Total Environment. 148389

  • Mayer AL (2008) Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environ Int 34(2):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldan B, Janousková S, Hák T (2012) How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecol Ind 17:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K (2012) “The social pillar of sustainable development: a literature review and framework for policy analysis, Sustainability”: Science. Pract Pol 8(1):15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmir M, Zarkesh MMK, Monavari SM, Jozi SA, Sharifi E (2016) “Analysis of land suitability for urban development in Ahwaz County in southwestern Iran using fuzzy logic and analytic network process (ANP). Environ Monit Assess 188:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5401-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamadzadeh P, Pourmoradian S, Feizizadeh B, Sharifi A, Vogdrup-Schmidt M (2020) A GIS-based approach for spatially-explicit sustainable development assessments in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J, Rinner C (2015) Multi Criteria decision analysis in geographic information science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael FL, Noor ZZ, Figueroa MJ (2014) Review of urban sustainability indicators assessment e case study between Asian countries. Habitat Int 44:491–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazmfar H (2017) Urban development predictions direction of using a combination GIS and Bayesian the probabilistic model (case study: Ardabil). Hum Geog Res Quart 49:357–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazmfar H, Roshan Roodi S (2015) Assessment of development sustainability level in 9th district of Mashhad district based on hierarchy models and network analysis. Journal Management System 5(15):49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazmfar H, Beheshti B (2016) Application of Combined model analytical network process and fuzzy logic models in Landslide susceptibility zonation (Case Study: Chellichay Catchment)”. J Geogr Environ Plan 27(1):53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Naboureh A, Rezaei Moghaddam MH, Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2017) An integrated object-based image analysis and CA-Markov model approach for modeling land use/land cover trends in the Sarab plain. Arab J Geosci 10(12):259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) “Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60(3):498–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neaupane, K.M., Achet, S.H., Piantanakulchai, M. 2008. “Landslide hazard assessment: a qualitative and a knowledge-based”. https://doi.org/10.1061/40972(311)109.

  • Neaupane KM, Piantanakulchai M (2006) Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation. Eng Geol 85:281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opon O, Henry M (2019) “An indicator framework for quantifying the sustainability of concrete materials from the perspectives of global sustainable development”, Journal of Cleaner Production. J Clean Prod 218:718–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope J, Bond A, Hugé J, Morrison-Saunders A (2017) Reconceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 62:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott-Allen R (1995) “Barometer of sustainability: a method of assessing progress towards sustainable societies. PADATA”, Victoria, Canada

  • Prescott-Allen R (2001) The wellbeing of nations. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi MB (2020) Measuring sustainability of urban mobility: a pilot study of Asian cities. Case Studies on Transport Policy 8(4):1224–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi Toosi S, Samani J (2016) Evaluating water management strategies in watersheds by new hybrid fuzzy analytical network process (FANP) methods. Hydrol 534:364–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26

  • Saaty TL (1996a) “The analytic network process. Pittsburgh”: RWS Publications

  • Saaty TL (1996b) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process, vol 4922. RWS publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockhammer E, Hochreiter H, Obermayr B, Steiner K (1997) The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) as an alternative to GDP in measuring economic welfare. The results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW calculation 1955–1992. Ecol Econ 21(1):19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokati B, Feizizadeh B (2018) Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of agro-ecological modeling for Saffron plant cultivation using GIS spatial decision making methods. J Environ Planning Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1427561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanguay GA, Rajaonson J, Lefebvre JF, Lanoie P (2010) Measuring the sustainability of cities: an analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecol Ind 10:407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2007) World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision. Population Division, United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Valmohammadi C, Valmohammadi C, Ghassemi A, Ghassemi A (2016) Identification and prioritization of the barriers of knowledge management implementation using fuzzy analytical network process: a case study of the Iranian context. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 46(3):319–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2015-0046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voinov AA (2008) Systems science and modeling for ecological economics. Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Yari Hesar A, Badri SA, Faraji Sabokbar HA (2011) Evaluation and assessment of Tehran Metropolis rural areas, rural research 4: 89–122

  • Yi P, Dong Q, Li W, Wang L (2021) Measurement of city sustainability based on the grey relational analysis: the case of 15 sub-provincial cities in China. Sustainable Cities and Society. 103143

  • YariHesar A, Bakhtiar S (2016) Application of Alen Prescott stability measurement model in analysis rural sustainable tourism case study: Nir county-Ardabil province. J Manag Syst 6(22):121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasouri M (2010) A survey of regional inequality status in Khorasan Razavi Province. Int J Environ Sci Dev 1(1):60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Hou X, Gao M, Shi P (2010) Assessment of coastal zone sustainable development: a case study of Yantai, China. Ecological Indicators 10:1218–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabihi H, Ahmad A, Vogeler I, Said MN, Golmohammadi M, Golein B, Nilashi M (2015) Land suitability procedure for sustainable citrus planning using the application of the analytical network process approach and GIS. Comput Electron Agric 117:114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarrabi A, Rezaei M (2013) Planning for sustainable urban development. Scientific. Res Quart Geogr Data (SEPEHR) 85(22):13–17

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hossein Nazmfar or Bakhtiar Feizizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nazmfar, H., Saeideh, A., Feizizadeh, B. et al. An integrated approach of the analytic network process and barometer model mapping of human settlement sustainability in Ardebil Province, Iran. Appl Geomat 14, 237–252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00426-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00426-2

Keywords

Navigation