References
Huang M, Fasching PA, Haiderali A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant single agent pembrolizumab for high-risk early stage triple negative breast cancer in the United States. Adv Ther. 2023;40(3):1153–70.
Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, et al. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl Med. 2020;382:810–21.
Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines) breast cancer version3.2023. 2023. https://www.nccn.org/. Accessed 13 Mar 2023.
Chan ALF, Leung HWC, Lu C-L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer: a systematic review. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(2):296–303.
Earl H, Hiller L, Vallier A-L, et al. Six versus 12 months’ adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: the PERSEPHONE non-inferiority RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24(40):1–190.
Earl HM, Hiller L, Vallier AL, et al. 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (PERSEPHONE): 4-year disease-free survival results of a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393:2599–612.
von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:617–28.
Garrison LP, Babigumira J, Tournier C, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pertuzumab with trastuzumab and chemotherapy compared to trastuzumab and chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in the United States. Value Health. 2019;22(4):408–15.
Piccart M, Procter M, Fumagalli D, et al. Adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer in the APHINITY trial: 6 years’ follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1448–57.
Hayes DF. Defining clinical utility of tumor biomarker tests: a clinicians viewpoint. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:238–48.
Cartun Z, Kunz WG, Heinzerling L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of response-adapted de-escalation of immunotherapy in advanced melanoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(12):1387–93.
Tu MM, Clemons M, Stober C, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 12-versus 4-weekly administration of bone-targeted agents in patients with bone metastases from breast and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Curr Oncol. 2021;28(3):1847–56.
Acknowledgements
Funding
No funding was received for the publication of this article.
Author Contributions
Steven Sorscher was the sole writer of this publication. Steven Sorscher meets the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and gave his approval for this version to be published.
Disclosures
Steven Sorscher is an employee of Biotheranostics, Inc./A Hologic Company.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human patients or animals performed by the author.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sorscher, S. Letter to the Editor Regarding “Cost-Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Single Agent Pembrolizumab for High-Risk Early-Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer in the United States”. Adv Ther 40, 4111–4113 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02596-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02596-w