Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthroscopic repair of glenoid rim fractures: a ligamentotaxis surgical technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Glenoid fractures occur as a result of direct impact of the humeral head against the glenoid rim following high-energy trauma. They frequently involve one-third of the glenoid surface with an oblique fracture rim from 2 to 6–7 o’clock, and they must not be confused with bony Bankart lesions. In medium-age patients, they are frequently associated with acute cuff tear while in older patients with chronic cuff tear: These conditions increase the instability of the shoulder if not treated. With this study, we reported the results of the arthroscopic ligamentotaxis technique treatment of acute antero-inferior glenoid fractures type IA of Ideberg with a cuff repair associated.

Materials and methods

Eleven patients with IA Ideberg glenoid fracture were treated with ligamentotaxis technique. Mean age: 56 years (45–70); 80% dominant side; male/female: 1.2. Mean extension area of glenoid fracture: 25%. The fragment was fixated reinserting the labro-ligamentous complex with a single 2 o’clock anchor. In six patients (55%), a rotator cuff tear was present, repaired during the surgical intervention. Radiological assessment: X-rays and CT with PICO method to measure the glenoid area involved. Clinical assessment: VAS, constant score, Dash score and Rowe score.

Results

After 30 months of follow-up (12–50), no differences in flexion, abduction, rotations and pain were reported compared to the contralateral side (p > 0.05). The mean normalized constant was 101 (60–123), and the mean Rowe was 93 (65–100). X-rays showed good healing without articular surface depressions or step in all cases. Two patients had a progression of gleno-humeral arthritis.

Conclusion

Acute antero-inferior glenoid rim fractures are uncommon but they are increasing in over 55 years population (frequently associated with cuff tear). Correct classification and treatment are necessary to achieve good results. The X-ray assessment includes the Neer’s trauma series and the CT study with PICO measurement of glenoid fragment size. Wrong treatment can lead to chronic instability, degenerative joint disease and poor results. The arthroscopic repair with ligamentotaxis is a good solution and permits the treatment of the associated rotator cuff tear. Arthroscopic technique imposes a long learning curve. CT can be used to confirm the anatomic reduction and the healing of the fracture but since it uses X-rays it must be reserved to comminuted fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Oostveen DPH, Temmerman OPP, Burger BJ, van Noort A, Robinson M (2014) Glenoid fractures: a review of pathology, classification, treatment and results. Acta Orthop Belg 80(1):88–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ideberg R (1984) Fractures of the scapula involving the glenoid fossa. In: Bateman JE, Welsh RP (eds) Surgery of the shoulder. BC Decker, Philadelphia, pp 63–66

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scheibel M, Kraus N, Gerhardt C, Haas NP (2009) Anteriore Glenoidranddefekte der Schulter. Orthop 38(1):41–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bigliani LU, Newton PM, Steinmann SP, Connor PM, Mcllveen SJ (1998) Glenoid rim lesions associated with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 26(1):41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maquieira GJ, Espinosa N, Gerber C, Eid K (2007) Non-operative treatment of large anterior glenoid rim fractures after traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(10):1347–1351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goss TP (1992) Fractures of the glenoid cavity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74(2):299–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Theivendran K, McBryde CW, Massoud SN (2008) Scapula fractures: a review. Trauma. 10(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaeger M, Lambert S, Südkamp NP, Kellam JF, Madsen JE, Babst R et al (2013) The AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) scapula fracture classification system: focus on glenoid fossa involvement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(4):512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cameron SE (1998) Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation of an anterior glenoid fracture. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 14(7):743–746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugaya H, Kon Y, Tsuchiya A (2005) Arthroscopic repair of glenoid fractures using suture anchors. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 21(5):635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bauer T, Abadie O, Hardy P (2006) Arthroscopic treatment of glenoid fractures. Arthroscopy 22(5):569.e1–569.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Porcellini G, Campi F, Paladini P (2002) Arthroscopic approach to acute bony Bankart lesion. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 18(7):764–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD (2009) Arthroscopic three-point double-row repair for acute bony Bankart lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 17(1):102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson F, Hinov V, Adams G (2002) Arthroscopic repair for anterior shoulder instability with a Bigliani type I glenoid rim fracture. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 18(6):E32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arthroscopic Bony Bankart fixation using a modified sugaya technique (Internet). (cited 2017 Mar 26). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3834646/

  16. Millett PJ, Braun S (2009) The ‘bony Bankart bridge’ procedure: a new arthroscopic technique for reduction and internal fixation of a bony Bankart lesion. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 25(1):102–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baudi P, Righi P, Bolognesi D, Rivetta S, Rossi Urtoler E, Guicciardi N et al (2005) How to identify and calculate glenoid bone deficit. Chir Organi Mov 90(2):145–152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rowe CR, Patel D, Southmayd WW (1978) The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(1):1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tauber M, Moursy M, Eppel M, Koller H, Resch H (2008) Arthroscopic screw fixation of large anterior glenoid fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 16(3):326–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160–164

    Google Scholar 

  21. Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJH, Søjbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P (2008) A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(2):355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Classifications of Osteoarthritis of the shoulder. In: Classifications and scores of the shoulder (Internet). Springer, Berlin; 2006 (cited 2017 Mar 26), pp 155–64. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-35142-6_13

  23. De Palma AF (1983) Fractures and fracture-dislocations of the shoulder girdle. In: Jacob RP, Kristainsen T, Mayo K et al (eds) Surgery of the shoulder, 3rd edn. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 366–367

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang C-Y, Zhu Y-M, Liu X, Li F-L, Lu Y, Wu G (2013) Do reduction and healing of the bony fragment really matter in arthroscopic bony Bankart reconstruction?: a prospective study with clinical and computed tomography evaluations. Am J Sports Med 41(11):2617–2623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim Y-K, Cho S-H, Son W-S, Moon S-H (2014) Arthroscopic repair of small and medium-sized bony Bankart lesions. Am J Sports Med 42(1):86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Giles JW, Puskas GJ, Welsh MF, Johnson JA, Athwal GS (2013) Suture anchor fixation of bony Bankart fractures: comparison of single-point with double-point ‘suture bridge’ technique. Am J Sports Med 41(11):2624–2631

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Corradini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration (version of 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013). Agree of Ethic Committee Prat. 68/17 Prot. numb 2835/C.E. 25/07/2017.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corradini, A., Campochiaro, G., Gialdini, M. et al. Arthroscopic repair of glenoid rim fractures: a ligamentotaxis surgical technique. Musculoskelet Surg 102 (Suppl 1), 41–48 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0558-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0558-4

Keywords

Navigation