Abstract
The intricate appearances produced by various lineages of biota have long been viewed as calling for a rational explanation. Biologists are capable of interpreting still just a relatively small part of the overall range of organismal forms and patterns. In fact, we can explain only those for which we find a functional role. Kalevi Kull’s current initiative, which aims at establishing biosemiotic foundations of aesthetics and introduction of concepts such as semiotic fitting, may help us elucidate various hitherto largely neglected aspects of self-expressive domains of life. Given that organisms are active autonomous agents, I suggest that some cases of semiotic fitting may be facilitated by semiotic co-option, a process where a trait is newly interpreted as meaningful within the umwelt of a living being and further adopted for a particular role. Clarification of connections between semiotic co-option and semiotic fitting may aid our attempts to better understand the role of meaning-attributive processes via which the aesthetic faculties of animate things come into existence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Arendt, H. (1978). The Life of the Mind. A Harvest Book.
Brejcha, J., Tureček, P., & Kleisner, K. (2021). Perception-driven dynamics of mimicry based on attractor field model. Interface Focus, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2020.0052
Collier, J. (2000). Autonomy and process closure as the basis for functionality. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 901(1), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1749-6632.2000.TB06287.X
Collier, J. (2004). Self-organization, individuation and identity. Revue Internationale De Philosophie, 228(2), 151–172.
Kleisner, K. (2011). Perceive, co-opt, modify, and live! Organism as a centre of experience. Biosemiotics, 4(2), 223–241.
Kleisner, K. (2015). Semantic organs: The concept and its theoretical ramifications. Biosemiotics, 8(3), 367–379.
Kleisner, K., & Saribay, S. A. (2019). The dual nature of mimicry: Organismal form and beholder’s eye. Biosemiotics, 12(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9333-z
Komárek, S. (2003). Mimicry, Aposematism and Related Phenomena. Mimetism in nature and the history of its study. München, Lincom Europa.
Kull, K. (2020). Semiotic fitting and the nativeness of community. Biosemiotics, 13, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-020-09375-y
Maran, T. (2017). Mimicry and Meaning: Structure and Semiotics of Biological Mimicry. Springer.
Maran, T., & Kleisner, K. (2010). Towards an evolutionary biosemiotics: Semiotic selection and semiotic co-option. Biosemiotics, 3(2), 189–200.
Neander, K. (1991). Functions as selected effects: The conceptual analyst’s defense. Philosophy of Science, 58(2), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1086/289610
Parker, A. (2000). 515 million years of structural colour. Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics, 2(6), 15–28. http://iopscience.iop.org/1464-4258/2/6/201
Parker, A. (2003). In the blink of an eye: How vision sparked the big bang of evolution. Basic Books.
Parker, A. (2011). On the origin of optics. Optics and Laser Technology, 43(2), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2008.12.020
Portmann, A. (1960). Neue Wege der Biologie. Piper.
Stibral, K. (2021). The Beauty of Organisms: Biological Aesthetics Between Darwin and Portmann. In J. Jaroš Filip, & Klouda (Ed.), Adolf Portmann: A Thinker of Self-Expressive Life (pp. 221–240). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67810-4_12
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Yogi Hendlin for invitation to write this commentary and Anna Pilátová for English proofreading. I am grateful to Czech Science Foundation project (reg. no 20-16633S) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Author has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleisner, K. Semiotic Fitting, Co-option, and the Art of Life. Biosemiotics 15, 31–35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09484-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09484-w