Abstract
Through a simple model of autogenic interpreting system featuring molecular constraint-work dynamics, Deacon (2021) critically tackles the issue of the nature of information in living systems and proposes that interpretation of a molecule as information about something else is more important than molecular replication. Two aspects of the target article are highlighted in this commentary. First, Deacon’s illustrations nicely resonate with and instantiate the wisdom in the doctrine of yin-yang in Chinese philosophy. Second, his theorizing demonstrates a bold intellectual innovation with regard to Peircean semiotics. In short, the article exemplifies what highly relevant, and succinct, semiotic modeling looks like.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Deacon, T. (2021). How molecules became signs. Biosemiotics (in the present issue).
Hoffmeyer, J. (1995). The semiotic body-mind. In N. Tasca (Ed.), Essays in honor of Thomas A. Sebeok (pp. 367–383). Almeida.
Hoffmeyer, J. 1996. Signs of meaning in the universe. B. J. Haveland (Trans.). Indiana University Press.
Huang, S., & Zhang, S. (2016). 周易译注 [Zhou Yi Zhu, ‘I Ching: Translated and annotated edition’]. Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
Lou, Y. (2016). 老子道德经注校释 [Lao Zi Dao De Jing Zhu Jiao Shi, ‘Tao Te Ching: Annotated Wang bi version’]. Zhonghua Book Company.
Peirce, C. S. 1931–1958 [1866–1913]. The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.); vols. 7–8, A. W. Burks (ed). Harvard University Press. Cited as CP.
Sebeok, T. A. (1979). The sign and its masters. University of Texas Press.
Sebeok, T. A. (1986). I think I am a verb: More contributions to the doctrine of signs. Plenum Press.
Sharov, A. A. (2020). Levels of interpretation of signs. Constructivist Foundations, 15(2), 147–148.
Yu, H. (2021). Modeling in semiotics: An integrative update. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 17(4), 639–659.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments and useful suggestions. My thanks also go to the Editors in Chief of Biosemiotics for their invitation to write this commentary.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, H. Semiosis at a Fundamental Level: Wisdom and Innovation. Biosemiotics 14, 597–601 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09462-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09462-8