Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of infill depth and fibre height of artificial turf on rotational traction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial turf is a widespread surface used for various field sports, offering unique advantages to natural grass such as all-weather availability and durability. This study aimed to determine the influence of infill depth and the exposed fibre height on shoe–surface traction for artificial turf surfaces. Particular focus was placed upon rotational traction, which has been associated with lower extremity injuries in sports. Ten artificial turf surfaces with varying infill depth and exposed fibre length were mechanically tested, with results indicating a significant impact of infill depth on rotational traction (F = 3.150, p = 0.017, \({\eta }^{2}\) = 0.104); as infill depth increased, a reduction in rotational traction was observed. For surfaces with longer carpet fibres, a trend to a significant correlation between exposed carpet fibre length and rotational traction was also observed (R2 = 0.7236, p = 0.068). Exposed fibre lengths above 18–20 mm were associated with an increase in rotational traction. Results suggest that at around 12–18 mm, any further reduction in exposed fibre length may have little to no influence on rotational traction. These findings have implications for player safety, aligning with prior research linking excessive rotational traction to elevated injury risks and highlight the importance of maintaining prescribed infill depths and exposed fibre lengths on artificial turf surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleming P (2011) Artificial turf systems for sport surfaces: current knowledge and research needs. Proc Institut Mechan Eng Part P J Sports Eng Technol 225(2):43–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337111401688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burillo P et al (2012) Mechanical assessment of artificial turf football pitches: the consequences of no quality certification. Scient Res Essays. https://doi.org/10.5897/sre11.1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zanetti EM, Bignardi C, Franceschini G, Audenino AL (2013) Amateur football pitches: Mechanical properties of the natural ground and of different artificial turf infills and their biomechanical implications. J Sports Sci 31(7):767–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.750005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wannop JW, Foreman T, Madden R, Stefanyshyn D (2019) Influence of the composition of artificial turf on rotational traction and athlete biomechanics. J Sports Sci 37(16):1849–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1598923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wannop J, Kowalchuk S, Esposito M, Stefanyshyn D (2020) Influence of artificial turf surface stiffness on athlete performance. Life 10(12):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wannop JW, Luo G, Stefanyshyn DJ (2013) Footwear traction and lower extremity noncontact injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45(11):2137–2143. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318299ac56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGhie D, Ettema G (2013) Biomechanical analysis of traction at the shoe-surface interface on third-generation artificial turf. Sports Eng 16(2):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-013-0115-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wannop JW, Stefanyshyn DJ (2016) The effect of translational and rotational traction on lower extremity joint loading. J Sports Sci 34(7):613–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1066023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Severn KA, Fleming PR, Clarke JD, Carre MJ (2011) Science of synthetic turf surfaces: Investigating traction behaviour. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part P J Sports Eng Technol 225(3):147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337111408980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sánchez-Sánchez J, García-Unanue J, Gallardo AM, Gallardo L, Hexaire P, Felipe JL (2018) Effect of structural components, mechanical wear and environmental conditions on the player–surface interaction on artificial turf football pitches. Mater Des 140:172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickson K, Sorochan J, Strunk W (2020) Impact of alternative synthetic turf infills on athlete performance and safety. 13th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020049035

  12. Jastifer J et al (2022) The development of mandatory practices for the testing and maintenance of synthetic turf fields in the National Football League. Int Turfgrass Soc Res J 14(1):352–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/its2.94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kent R et al (2015) The mechanical interactions between an American football cleat and playing surfaces in-situ at loads and rates generated by elite athletes: a comparison of playing surfaces. Sports Biomech 14(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2015.1024277

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Tay SP, Fleming P, Hu X, Forrester S (2017) Skin friction related behaviour of artificial turf systems. J Sports Sci 35(15):1500–1507. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1223330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Forrester S, Fleming P (2019) Traction forces generated during studded boot-surface interactions on third-generation artificial turf: a novel mechanistic perspective. Engineering Reports, In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association. 49(35). https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12066

  16. Severn KA (2010) Science of synthetic turf surfaces: player-surface interactions. Loughborough University. Thesis. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/7216

  17. Sujae IH, Abdul Jabbar K, Ong CY, Hamill J (2022) Differences in joint loading during a side-step cutting manoeuvre on different artificial turf infill depths. Sports Biomech 21(9):981–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1713206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jastifer JR, McNitt AS, Mack CD, Kent RW, McCullough KA, Coughlin MJ, Anderson RB (2019) Synthetic turf: History, design, maintenance, and athlete safety. Sports Health 11(1):84–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738118793378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dickson KH, Straw CM, Thoms AW, Carson TD, Sorochan JC (2022) Impact of third generation synthetic turf athletic field age on surface hardness and infill depth spatial variability. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part P J Sports Eng Technol 236(3):192–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371211002947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyers MC (2019) Incidence, mechanisms, and severity of game-related high school football injuries across artificial turf systems of various infill weights. Orthopaedic J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119832878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McGowan H et al (2023) Understanding the variability in rotational traction testing on artificial turf. Sports Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00426-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and by FieldTurf—grant number CRDPJ 533859–18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

    Jake Ruschkowski, Joel M. Varughese, Darren J. Stefanyshyn & John W. Wannop

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

    Jake Ruschkowski & John W. Wannop

Authors
  1. Jake Ruschkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joel M. Varughese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Darren J. Stefanyshyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John W. Wannop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jake Ruschkowski or John W. Wannop.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Although this project was partially funded by FieldTurf, FieldTurf was not involved in data collection or in the interpretation of the results.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruschkowski, J., Varughese, J.M., Stefanyshyn, D.J. et al. Influence of infill depth and fibre height of artificial turf on rotational traction. Sports Eng 27, 13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-024-00455-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-024-00455-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation