Abstract
Patients with metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) exhibit reduced response to chemotherapy and have poor prognosis. We investigated a case of MBC that showed a positive response to preoperative chemotherapy, resulting in near pathological complete response (pCR). A 59-year-old woman complained of a lump in her right breast. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed the presence of a solid mass that was 24 mm in diameter. The pathological diagnosis was MBC with cartilaginous differentiation. The clinical stage was T2N0M0, stage IIA according to the International Union against Cancer (UICC) criteria. To observe the response to chemotherapy, we gave her preoperative chemotherapy. The patient was monitored closely, since we realized that failure of chemotherapy carries a risk of tumor progression. Evaluation was carried out using ultrasound, MRI, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and a Ki-67 labeling index after the first cycle of chemotherapy, and ultrasound after each additional cycle. FDG-PET showed a positive response after the first cycle of chemotherapy. The patient underwent 4 cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) followed by 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and cisplatin (50 mg/m2). Ultrasound showed decreases in tumor size after each cycle of chemotherapy. After chemotherapy, MRI showed nearly complete regression of the tumor. Partial mastectomy was performed. Pathological examination showed few cancer cells remaining, indicating near pCR. We report a case of MBC that responded well to platinum-based preoperative chemotherapy. We propose that preoperative chemotherapy may be an option for treatment of MBC in conjunction with careful monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chao TC, Wang CS, Chen SC, Chen MF. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. J Surg Oncol. 1999;71(4):220–5.
Pezzi CM, Patel-Parekh L, Cole K, Franko J, Klimberg VS, Bland K. Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(1):166–73.
Al Sayed AD, El Weshi AN, Tulbah AM, Rahal MM, Ezzat AA. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast clinical presentation, treatment results and prognostic factors. Acta Oncol. 2006;45(2):188–95.
Hennessy BT, Giordano S, Broglio K, Duan Z, Trent J, Buchholz TA, et al. Biphasic metaplastic sarcomatoid carcinoma of the breast. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(4):605–13.
Gibson GR, Qian D, Ku JK, Lai LL. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and outcomes. Am Surg. 2005;71(9):725–30.
Rayson D, Adjei AA, Suman VJ, LE Wold, Ingle JN. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognosis and response to systemic therapy. Ann Oncol. 1999;10(4):413–9.
Beatty JD, Atwood M, Tickman R, Reiner M. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical significance. Am J Surg. 2006;191(5):657–64.
Dave G, Cosmatos H, Do T, Lodin K, Varshney D. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: a retrospective review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(3):771–5.
Reis-Filho JS, Milanezi F, Steele D, Savage K, Simpson PT, Nesland JM, et al. Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like tumours. Histopathology. 2006;49(1):10–21.
Cheang MC, Voduc D, Bajdik C, Leung S, Mc Kinney S, Chia SK, et al. Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(5):1368–76.
Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, Ibrahim N, Cristofanilli M, Anderson K, et al. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(16):5678–85.
Heys SD, Sarkar T, Hutcheon AW. Primary docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: impact on response and survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;90(2):169–85.
Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, Miller ID, Payne S, Gilbert FJ, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(6):1456–66.
Downs-Kelly E, Nayeemuddin KM, Albarracin C, Wu Y, Hunt KK, Gilcrease MZ. Matrix-producing carcinoma of the breast: an aggressive subtype of metaplastic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(4):534–41.
Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO. Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15):2568–81.
Kurosumi M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Akiyama F, Komoike Y, Mukai H, Nakamura S, et al. Histopathological criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in breast cancer (2007 version). Breast Cancer. 2008;15(1):5–7.
Schwarz-Dose J, Untch M, Tiling R, Sassen S, Mahner S, Kahlert S, et al. Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(4):535–41.
Rousseau C, Devillers A, Sagan C, Ferrer L, Bridji B, Campion L, et al. Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(34):5366–72.
Kuroi K, Toi M, Tsuda H, Kurosumi M, Akiyama F. Issues in the assessment of the pathologic effect of primary systemic therapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2006;13(1):38–48.
Toi M, Nakamura S, Kuroi K, Iwata H, Ohno S, Masuda N, et al. Phase II study of preoperative sequential FEC and docetaxel predicts of pathological response and disease free survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110(3):531–9.
Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, Rajan R, Kuerer H, Valero V, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4414–22.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Tomomi Nishimura for taking photos of pathology and Ms. Akiko Shiomi and Ms. Kikuko Fujita for their technical assistance with the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Takuwa, H., Ueno, T., Ishiguro, H. et al. A case of metaplastic breast cancer that showed a good response to platinum-based preoperative chemotherapy. Breast Cancer 21, 504–507 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-011-0269-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-011-0269-2