Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Honey: A Skin Graft Fixator Convenient for Both Patient and Surgeon

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Skin grafts can be used effectively to cover burn injuries. A critical element of this treatment is the adherence of the graft to the wound bed. Honey has been shown to increase the adherence of skin grafts to wound beds and have antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects and increase healing rate of wounds. We therefore devised a clinical trial to determine the effect of honey on skin graft fixation in burn injuries. Sixty patients were included in this study (in 30 patients, graft was fixed with medical honey, and in 30 patients, it was fixed with dressing or suturing). All patients in two groups were evaluated for infection, graft loss, graft contraction, severity of pain, and need for re-operation. The most common cause of burn was kerosene. Honey significantly decreased infection rate on fifth day and reduced the patient pain. The mean hospital stay was shorter in honey group. Contraction of graft was significantly less in honey group. Honey has strong adhesive properties for skin graft fixation. Medical honey is a natural material, not synthetic. For this reason, we can advise the application of medical honey for the fixation of split thickness skin graft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Majno G (1975) The healing hand. Man and wound in the ancient world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p 571

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ransome HM (1937) The sacred bee in ancient times and folklore. Allen & Unwin, London, p 308

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gunther RT (1959) The Greek herbal dioscorides. Hafner, New York [Goodyear J, trans.]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zumla A, Lulat A (1989) Honey—a remedy rediscovered. J R Soc Med 82:384–5

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen KL, Molan PC, Reid GM (1991) A survey of the antibacterial activity of some New Zealand honeys. J Pharm Pharmacol 43:817–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergam A, Yanai J, Weis J et al (1983) Acceleration of wound healing by topical application of honey: an animal model. Am J Surg 145:374–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maghsoudi H, Moradi S. Comparison between topical honey and mafenide acetate in treatment of burn wounds. Annals of burns and fire disasters - vol. XXIV - n. 3 -September 2011

  8. Obaseiki-Ebor EE, Afonya TCA (1983) Preliminary report on the antimicrobial activity of honey distillate. J Pharm Pharmacol 35:748–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Efem SEE (1988) Clinical observations on the wound healing properties of honey. Br J Surg 75:679–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper R, Molan PC (1999) The use of honey as a antiseptic in managing Pseudomonas infection. J Wound Care 8:161–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Molan PC (1999) The role of honey in the management of wounds. J Wound Care 8:415–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Postmes T, Bosch MMC, Dutrieux R et al (1997) Speeding up the healing of burns with honey. An experimental study with histological assessment of wound biopsies. In: Mizrahi A, Lensky Y (eds) Bee products: properties, applications and apiotherapy. Plenum Press, New York, pp 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  13. Postmes T, Boogaard AE, van den Hazen M (1993) Honey for wounds, ulcers, and skin graft preservation. Lancet 341:756–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Subrahmanyam M, Archan M, Pawar SG (2001) Antibacterial activity of honey on bacteria isolated from wounds. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 14:22–4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Postmes T, van den Boogaard A, Hazen M (1995) The sterilization of honey with cobalt 60 gamma radiation: a study of honey spiked with spores of Clostridium botulinum and Bacillus subtilis. Experientia 51:986–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Molan PC, Allen KL (1996) The effect of gamma-irradiation on the antibacterial activity of honey. J Pharm Pharmacol 48:1206–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Molan PC (1996) Honey as an antimicrobial agent. In: Mizrahi A, Lensky Y (eds) Bee products. Plenum Press, New York, pp 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bogdanov S (1996) Non-peroxide antimicrobial activity of honey. In: Mizrahi A, Lensky Y (eds) Bee products. Plenum Press, New York, pp 39–47

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tovey FI (2000) Honey and sugar as a dressing for wounds and ulcers. Trop Doct 30:1, Editorial

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Snowdon JA, Cliver DO (1996) Micro-organisms in honey. Int J Food Microbiol 31:1–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Birch J, Branemark PI (1969) The vascularization of a free full thickness skin graft: a vital microscopic study. Scand J Plast Surg 3:1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Converse JM, Rapaport FT (1956) The vascularization of skin autografts and homografts: an experimental study in man. Ann Surg 143:306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Haller JA, Billingham RE (1967) Studies of the origin of vasculature in free skin grafts. Ann Surg 166:896

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudge R (2007) An easy and safe method of split-thickness skin graft fixation. Burns 33:1074–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mah E, Morrison WA (2006) A stitch in time (save mines). Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2535–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yenidünya MO, Özdengill E, Emsen I (2000) Split-thickness skin graft fixation with surgical drape. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1429–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alexander G, Al-Rasheed AA (2005) Skin stapler removal by artery forceps: a hazardous practice? Burns 31:116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Adler N, Nachumovsky S, Meshulam-Derazon S, Ad-El D (2007) Skin graft fixation with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in burn patients. Burns 33:803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mohammadi A, Johari HG (2008) Amniotic membrane: a skin graft fixator convenient for both patient and surgeon. Burns 34:1051–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dunford C (2005) The use of honey-derived dressing to promote effective wound management. Prof Nurse 20(8):35–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Hemmat Maghsoudi & Sohrab Moradi

  2. Sina Hospital, Azadi Street, P.O. Box 1548, Tabriz, 5163639888, East Azarbaijan, Iran

    Hemmat Maghsoudi

Authors
  1. Hemmat Maghsoudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sohrab Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemmat Maghsoudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maghsoudi, H., Moradi, S. Honey: A Skin Graft Fixator Convenient for Both Patient and Surgeon. Indian J Surg 77 (Suppl 3), 863–867 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-014-1039-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-014-1039-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation