Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New Treatment Options for Lung Adenocarcinoma - in View of Molecular Background

  • Review
  • Published:
Pathology & Oncology Research

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related mortality all over the world, and a number of developments have indicated future clinical benefit recently. The development of molecular pathology methods has become increasingly important in the prediction of chemotherapy sensitivity and mutation analysis to identify driver mutations as important targets of new therapeutic agents. The most significant changes in the treatment of NSCLC revealed in new pathologic classification and in the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies, which include monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The side effects of these agents are generally better tolerated than those of conventional chemotherapy and show higher efficacy. The most important factor follows: histology subtypes, gene mutation status, patients’ selection, drug toxicities and occurence of drug resistance. In the advanced disease, the hope of cure is less than 3 %, but improvements in survival have been clearly achieved. Some years ago the median lung cancer survival rate was 10–12 months, now in case of available specific molecular targets, a significant increase in median survival rates to 24–36 months has been achieved. These agents give an opportunity to provide a new standard of care. Therefore testing EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma should be incorporated into routine clinical practice. This review focuses on the rationale for targeted agents and new treatment possibilities in case of advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

SCLC:

Small cell lung cancer

NOS:

Not otherwise specified

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

VEGFR:

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

PDGFR:

Platelet-derived growth factor receptor

ALK:

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase

TKI:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

PFS:

Progression free survival

OS:

Overall survival

ORR:

Overall response rate

QOL:

Quality of life

References

  1. Travis WD, Brambilla E et al (2011) International association for the study of lung cancer/American thoracic society/European respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thoracic Oncol 6:2244–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mino-Kenudson M et al (2010) A novel, high sensitive antibody allows for the routine detection of ALK – rearranged lung adenocarcinomas by standard immunohistochemistry. Clin Cancer Res 16:1561–1571

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiller JH (2002) Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. NSCLC Meta –Analysis Collaborative Group (2008) Chemotherapy in addition to supportive care improves survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 randomised controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 28:4617–4625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Azolli CG (2009) American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 36:6251–6266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ettinger DS (2010) Non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7:740–801

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paz-Ares L (2012) Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamosus non-small cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double –blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 3:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paz-Ares L, PPARAMOUNT (2012) Final overall survival (OS) result of the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed (pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (plb) plus BSC immediatly following induction treatment with pem plus cisplatin (cis) for advanced nonsquamosus (NS) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 30:(Suppl; abstr LBA7507)

  9. Pennel NA (2009) Combined inhibition of the VEGFR and EGFR signalling pathways in the treatment of NSCLC. Oncologist 14:399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oxanard GR, Binder A (2013) New targetable oncogenes in Non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:1097–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaughan EM (2011) Genotype-driven therapies for non-small cell lung cancer: focus on EGFR, KRAS and ALK gene abnormalities. Ther Adv Med Oncol 3:113–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hynes NE, Lane H (2005) ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 5:341–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gazdar AF (2009) Acitvating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer: role in clinical responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene 28:24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee YJ et al (2011) Lung cancer in never smokers: change of a mindset in the molecular era. Lung Cancer 72:9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinersman JM et al (2011) Frequency of EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung adenocarcinoma in African Americans. J Thorac Oncol 6:28–31

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patrick JR, Thomas ES (2013) KRAS mutation: should We test for it, and does it matter? J Clin Oncol 31:1112–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guan JL et al (2013) KRAS mutation in patients with lung cancer: a predictor for poor prognosis but Not for EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 4:1381–11388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukuoka M (2009) Biomarker analyses from a phase III, randomised, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib(G) versus carboplatin/paclitaxel(C/P) in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Asia (IPASS) J Clin Oncol 27:(suppl 15)

  19. Shepherd FA (2005) Erlotinib in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. N Eng Med 353:123–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Capuzzo F (2010) Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised, placebo –controlled phase III study. Lancet Oncol 6:521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou C, Wu YL (2010) Efficacy results from the randomised phase III OPTIMAL (CTONG 0802) study comparing first-line Erlotinib versus carboplatin (CBDCA) plus gemcitabine (GEM) in Chinese advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (PTS) with EGFR activating mutations. Ann Oncol 21(supp.8):LBA 13

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garassino MC (2012) TAILOR: A phase III trial comparing erlotinib with docetaxel as the second-line treatment of NSCLC patients with wild –type (wt) EGFR. J Clin Oncol 30:(abstr LBA7501)

  23. Rosell R, Carcereny E et al (2013) Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 3:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim ES, Hirsh V et al (2008) Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST) a randomised phase III trial. The Lancet 372:1809–1818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fukuoka M, Wu Y (2011) Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomised, open –label, first-line study of Gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced Non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol 29:2866–2874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mok TS (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Eng J Med 361:947–957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Inoue A, Minegishi M, Maemondo M (2010) Final results of a phase II study of first- line gefitinib for elderly patients (PTS) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbour epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. NEJ 003 study. Ann Oncol 21:(Suppl 8) Abstract:3559

  28. The Pirker R, Pereira JR (2012) EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. Lancet Oncol 1:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Teblutt N, Pedersen MW (2013) Targeting the ERBB family in cancer: couples therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 13:663–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller VA (2012) Phase IIB/III double-blind randomised trial of afatinib (BIBW 2992, an irreversibile inhibitor of EGFR/HER1 and HER2) + best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo + BSC in patients with NSCLC failing 1-2 lines of chemotehrapy and erlotinib or gefitinib (LUX-LUNG 1) Ann Oncol 21:(Suppl 8,LBA1)

  31. Chi YJ (2012) LUX-Lung 3: A randomized, open-label, phase III study of afatinib versus pemetrexed and cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung harboring EGFR-activating mutations. J Clinic Oncol 30:18(Suppl. LBA 7500)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pao W (2004) Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with second mutation in the EGFR kinase ddomain. PloS Med 2:2129–2139

    Google Scholar 

  33. Janjigian YY, Smit EF, Horn L, et al. (2012) Activity of afatinib/cetuximab in patients (pts) with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and acquired resistance (AR) to EGFR inhibitors. Ann Oncol 23:(Suppl 9) abstr. 1227

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sequist LV, Besse B (2010) Neratinib, an irreversible Pan-ErB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: result of phase II trial in patients with advanced Non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:3076–3083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Maemondo M, Inoue A (2010) Gefinitib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Eng J Med 362:2380–2388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pao W, Hutchinson KE (2012) Chipping away the lung cancer genome. Nat Med 18:349.351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yano S, Yamada T (2011) Hepatocyte growth factor expression in EGFR mutant lung cancer with intrinsic and acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in japanase cohort. J Thorac Oncol 6:2011–2017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Oxnard GR, Arcila ME (2011) New strategies on overcoming acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17:5530–5537

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ohashi K, Maruvka YE (2013) Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor –resistant disease. J Clin Oncol 31:1070–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shikada Y (2005) Platelet-derived growth factor-A is an essential and autocrine regulators of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in non-small cell lung carcinomas. Cancer Res 6:7241–7248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sandler A (2006) Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small cell lung cancer. N Eng J Med 24:2542–2550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Crino L, Dansin E (2010) Safety and efficacy of first line bevacizumab based in advanced non-squamosus non-small cell lung cancer (SAIL MO19390) Phase 4 study. Lancet Oncol 8:733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cho BC, Kim BH, Soo RA (2010) The role of monoclonal antibody in combination with first-line chemotherapy in Asian patients with advanced Non-small cell lung cancer the role of monoclonal antibody in combination with first-line chemotherapy in Asian patients with advanced Non-small cell lung cancer. Yonsei Med J 1:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schiller JH, Larson T (2009) Efficacy and safety of axitinib (AG-013736 AG) in patients with advanced Non-small-cell lung cancer: results from phase II study. J Clin Oncol 23:3836–3841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chue QS (2009) Aflibercept(AVE0005) an alternative strategy for inhibiting tumour angiogenesis by vascular endothelial growth factors. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Goss GD (2010) Randomised, double-blind trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with either daily oral cediranib or placebo in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: NCIC clinical trial group BR24 study. J Clin Oncol 1:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wedge SR (2002) ZD6474 inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor signalling, angiogenesis, and tumor growth following oral administration. Cancer Res 62:4645–4655

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Novello S (2009) Phase II study of continuous daily sunitinib dosing in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 9:1543–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Blumenschein GR Jr (2009) Phase II, multicenter, uncontrolled trial of single –agent sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non –small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:4274–4280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Polverino A (2006) AMG 706, an oral, multikinase inhibitor that selectively targets vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet –derived gowth facror and kit receptors, potently inhibits angiogenesis and induces regression in tumor xenografts. Cancer Res 17:8715–8721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Blumenschein GR, Kabbinavar F (2011) Randomised open label phase II study of motesanib or bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin (P/C) for advanced nonsquamosus non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol 9:2057–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Aggarwall C (2012) Antiangiogenic agents in the the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer:where do we stand and where are we headed? Cancer Biol Ther 5:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Soda M (2007) Identification of the transforming EML 4-ALK fusion gene in non –small cell lung cancer. Nature 448:561–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ardini E, Magnaghi P (2010) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase: role in specifis tumours, and development of small molecule inhibitors for cancer therapy. Cencer letters 299:81–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Capuzzo F, Marchetti A (2009) Increased MET gene copy number negatively affects survival of surgical resected non-small-cell lung cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 27:1667–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bergethon K, Shaw AT (2012) ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:863–870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. McDermott U (2008) Genomic alterations of anaplastic lymphoma kinase may sensitize tumors to anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res 68:3389–3395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pao W, Girard N (2011) New driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol 12:175–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Settleman J (2009) Cell culture modelling of genotype-directed sensitivity to selective kinase inhibitors: targeting the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). Semin Oncol S36–41

  60. Kwak EL (2010) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitions in non-small cell lung cancer. N Eng J Med 363:1693–1703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gadgeel M, Bepler G (2011) Crizotinib: an anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor. Future Oncol 8:947–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Alice Tsang S, Ranee Mehra (2013) Clinical activity of the ALK inhibitor LDK378 in advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC. J Clin Oncol 31:(suppl) Abstr 8010

  63. Sequist LV, Akerley Wl (2010) Final results from AR197-209: a global randomised placebo –controlled phase II clinical trial of erlotinib PLUS ARQ197 versus erlotinib plus placebo in previously treated EGFR- inhibitor naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol 21:(Suppl.8) Abstr 3630

  64. Robinson KW, Sandler AB (2013) The role of MET receptor tyrosine kinase in Non-small cell lung cancer and clinical development of targeted anti-MET agents. Oncologist 18:115–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Herbst RS, Sandler A (2008) Bevacizumab and erlotinib: a promising new approach to the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Oncologist 13:1166–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Haisworth J (2008) A phase III multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab(Avastin) in combination with erlotinib (Tarceva) compared with chemotherapy alone for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer after failure of standard first line chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 3:(Suppl.4)

  67. Kabbinavar F, Miller VA (2010) Overall survival (OS) in ATLAS, a phase IIIb trial comparing bevacizumab(B) therapy with or without erlotinib(E) after completion of chemoterapy with B for first line treatment of locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) J Clin Oncol 28:(Suppl 15)abstr 7526

  68. Gandara D (2009) S0536: carboplatin, paclitaxel, cetuximab and bevacizumab followed by cetuximab and bevacizumab maintenance in advanced NSCLC: a SWOG phase II study. J Clin Oncol 27:(Suppl.15) abstr 8015

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lind JS, Dingemans AMC (2009) A phase II study of erlotinib and sorafenib in chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16:3078–3087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Herbst RS, Gordon MS et al. (2013) A study of MPD3280A, an engineered PD-L1 antibody in patients with locally advanced or metastatic tumors. J Clin Oncol 31:(suppl) Abstr 3000

  71. Dasanu CA, Sethi N (2012) Immune alterations and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches in lung cancer. Expert Opin Biol 12:923–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Samuels Y (2004) High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 304:554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Malaga D (2008) Activating E17K mutation in the gene encoding the protein kinase AKT1 in a subset of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Cell cycle 7:665–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Naoki K (2002) Missense mutations of the BRAF gene in human lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 62:7001–7003

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Marks JL (2008) Novel MEK 1 mutation identified by mutational analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor signalling pathway genes in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 68:5524–5528

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gridelli C, Maione P (2008) The potential Role of mTOR inhibitor sin Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Oncologist 2:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Dong S, Zhang XC (2012) Everolimus synergizes with gefitinib in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 5:707–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Belani CP, Goss G (2011) Recent clinical developments and rationale for combining targeted agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer Treat Rev 38:173–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Frierich MJ (2011) NSCLC drug targets acquire New visibility. J Nat Cancer Inst 5:366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nora Bittner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bittner, N., Ostoros, G. & Géczi, L. New Treatment Options for Lung Adenocarcinoma - in View of Molecular Background. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 20, 11–25 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-013-9719-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-013-9719-9

Keywords

Navigation