Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between communication and construction safety climate in China

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cultivating a good safety climate is critical to the improvement of safety performance in construction. Previous research has demonstrated that communication is important in strengthening the safety climate. However, few studies have addressed the role of jobsite communication in safety or investigated its relationship with the safety climate. Attempts to optimize communication to improve the safety climate appear to lack both adequate theoretical and empirical bases, as well as consensus on its importance. Therefore, this study identifies the relationship between communication and construction safety climate. The authors surveyed four subcontractors employed on two construction projects, which were administered by different Chinese state-owned enterprises. Models of the safety communication structure and safety climate were developed through social network analysis. Interviews were conducted to confirm and summarize the findings. The results indicate that a positive safety climate could be associated with higher communication density and degree centrality, as well as with lower betweenness centrality. To enhance the jobsite safety climate, this study recommends the following best practices: (1) Construction safety leaders (e.g., site managers) should communicate more frequently with construction workers when high organizational centrality is detected. (2) Additional communication channels should be established to bridge communication gaps among individuals. The findings validate the importance of communication as a way to manage the safety climate of Chinese construction projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, R. D. (1982). “Taking stock of network analysis: A decade’s results.” Research Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 1, pp. 39–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., and Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis, Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. M. and Ellison, N. B. (2007). “Social network sites: Denition, history, and scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 210–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. and Xiao, H. (2010). “Understanding chinese and british construction: a problem of metaphors.” Proc. 26th Annual Conf. of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2010, September 6, 2010–September 8, 2010, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM, Leeds, United Kingdom, pp. 371–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. and Harary, F. (1956). “Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory.” Psychological Review, Vol. 63, pp. 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinowsky, P., Diekmann, J., and Galotti, V. (2008). “Social network model of construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 10, pp. 804–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinowsky, P. S., Diekmann, J., and O’Brien, J. (2010). “Project organizations as social networks.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 452–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigularov, K., Chen, P., and Rosecrance, J. (2010). “The effects of error management climate and safety communication on safety: A multilevel study.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 1498–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. D. and Phillips, R. A. (2004). “Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship.” Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1996). “What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A natives point of view on a decade of paradigm wars.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 619–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, R. G., Liu, F., Sun, T., and Sun, H. (2010). “The study on project governance based on social network analysis–An example of large construction project supervision.” China Soft Science, Vol. 6, pp. 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, J., Neitzel, R., Meischke, H., Daniell, W., Sheppard, L., Stover, B., and Seixas, N. (2009). “Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers.” Annals of Occupational Hygiene, Vol. 53, pp. 605–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evia, C. (2011). “Localizing and designing computer-based safety training solutions for Hispanic construction workers.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 137, No. 6, pp. 452–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, D., Chen, Y., and Wong, L. (2006). “Safety climate in construction industry: A case study in Hong Kong.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 6, pp. 573–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, D., Huang, X., and Hinze, J. (2005). Construction safety management, Water & Power Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadd, S. (2002). Safety culture-A review of the literature, HSL Shefeld, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldenmund, F. W. (2000). “The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research.” Safety Science, Vol. 34, Nos. 1–3, pp. 215–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). “Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange.” Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D. A. and Morgeson, F. P. (1999). “Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 286–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. and Hickey, S. (2004). Improving driver/signaler safety critical communications — Report on conduct surveys, Technical report 10/TO14/AEAR/49/TRT, AEA Technology Rail, Derby, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsanis, C. J. (2006). “Network organizations: Structural and strategic implications.” Proc. 2nd Specialty Conf. on Leadership and Management in Construction, PM Publishing, Louisville, CO, pp. 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, J. and Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams, Havard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kines, P., Andersenb, LPS., Spangenberga, S., Mikkelsena, KL., Dyreborga, J., and Zoharc, D. (2010). “Improving construction site safety through leader-based verbal safety communication.” Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, V. E. (2004). Managing the connected organization, August 1, 2009, www.orgnet.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, H. (2010). “Application of information tracking in construction safety management.” Operative Economy & Science, Vol. 2, pp. 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., Xi, Y., and Yao, X. (2008). “Where does help come from: A case study of network analysis in an academic group.” Connections, Vol. 28, pp. 73–87.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, C., Zhi-ri, L., and Xi, L. (2005). “The demonstration of enterpirise interior communication and organization reengineering.” Journal of Central South University (Social Science), Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 640–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. H. (2008). “Construction safety management requires coordination between communication and organization.” Electric Safety Technology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loosemore, M. and Andonakis, N. (2007). “Barriers to implementing OHS reforms — The experiences of small subcontractors in the Australian construction industry.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, K., Whitaker, S. M., and Flin, R. (2003). “Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments.” Safety Science, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 641–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1960). The sociometry reader, The Free Press, Glencoe, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, S. C., Dainty, A. R. J., Burns, N. D., Brookes, N. J., and Backhouse, C. J. (2006). “Managing relationships to improve performance: A case study in the global aerospace industry.” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 44, No. 16, pp. 3227–3241.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, A., Grifn, M. A., and Hart, P. M. (2000). “The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior.” Safety Science, Vol. 34, Nos. 1–3, pp. 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. (2007). “Managing the risk of subcontractor defaults.” Proc. the State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section’s 20th Annual Construction Law Conf., March 1, San Antonio, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. (2011). “The use of a social network analysis technique to investigate the characteristics of crew communications in nuclear power plants — A feasibility study.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 96, No. 10, pp. 1275–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawacha, E., Naoum, S., and Fong, D. (1999). “Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). “The people make the place.” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. and Levitt, R. (2004). Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries, Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, J. (1996). “Effects of workload and structure on team processes and performance: Implications for complex team decision making.” Human Factors, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (2005). Investigation report of refinery explosion and fire for Bp, Washington, DC, www.csb.gov/bp-america-refinery-explosion/

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. and Song, S. (2009). “A study of safety communication issues based on Johari Window.” Electric Safety Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, F. (2003). Research on construction safety performance measurement, Master’s Thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue-sheng, D., En-yuan, W., Xue-qiu, H., Li, L., and Da-zhao, S. (2009). “The role of effective communication of safety information in enhancing safety culture.” China Safety Science Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Chen, J., Jia, G., and Mao, R. (2009). “The performance setting for construction project based on social network analysis.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy, Vol. 21, No. 21, pp. 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (2010). “Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 1517–1522.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pin-Chao Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, PC., Lei, G., Fang, D. et al. The relationship between communication and construction safety climate in China. KSCE J Civ Eng 18, 887–897 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0492-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0492-4

Keywords

Navigation