Abstract
The objective is to evaluate the performance of blood test results, radiomics, and a combination of the two data types on the prediction of the 24-h oxygenation support need for the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. In this retrospective cohort study, COVID-19 patients with confirmed real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) test results between February 2020 and August 2021 were investigated. Initial blood cell counts, chest radiograph, and the status of oxygenation support used within 24 h were collected (n = 290; mean age, 45 ± 19 years; 125 men). Radiomics features from six lung zones were extracted. Logistic regression and random forest models were developed using the clinical-only, radiomics-only, and combined data. Ten repeats of fivefold cross-validation with bootstrapping were used to identify the input features and models with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Higher AUCs were achieved when using only radiomics features compared to using only clinical features (0.94 ± 0.03 vs. 0.88 ± 0.04). The best combined model using both radiomics and clinical features achieved highest in the cross-validation (0.95 ± 0.02) and test sets (0.96 ± 0.02). In comparison, the best clinical-only model yielded AUCs of 0.88 ± 0.04 in cross-validation and 0.89 ± 0.03 in test set. Both radiomics and clinical data can be used to predict 24-h oxygenation support need for COVID-19 patients with AUC > 0.88. Moreover, the combination of both data types further improved the performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated or analyzed during the study are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions and confidentiality agreements but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
World Health Organization. Origin of SARS-COV-2. World Health Organization; 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/origin-of-sars-cov-2. Accessed 1 Mar 2023.
Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):420–2.
World Health Organization. Severe acute respiratory infections treatment centre: practical manual to set up and manage a SARI treatment centre and a SARI screening facility in health care facilities. World Health Organization; 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/10665-331603. Accessed 1 Mar 2023.
World Health Organization. Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2: interim guidance. World Health Organization; 2020. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/334254. Accessed 1 Mar 2023.
Stephanie S, Shum T, Cleveland H, et al. Determinants of chest x-ray sensitivity for COVID-19: a multi-institutional study in the United States. Radiol: Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2(5): e200337.
Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB, et al. The role of chest imaging in patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multinational consensus statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2020;296(1):172–80.
World Health Organization. Use of chest imaging in COVID-19: a rapid advice guide. World Health Organization; 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/use-of-chest-imaging-in-covid-19. Accessed 1 Mar 2023.
World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control of epidemic-and pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care: World Health Organization; 2014. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/infection-prevention-and-control-of-epidemic-and-pandemic-prone-acute-respiratory-infections-in-health-care. Accessed 1 Mar 2023.
Smith DL, Grenier J-P, Batte C, et al. A characteristic chest radiographic pattern in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. Radiol: Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2(5):e200280.
Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1234–48.
Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(12):749–62.
Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278(2):563–77.
Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(4):441–6.
Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G, et al. Introduction to radiomics. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(4):488–95.
Aerts HJ. The potential of radiomic-based phenotyping in precision medicine: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(12):1636–42.
Attallah O. RADIC: a tool for diagnosing COVID-19 from chest CT and X-ray scans using deep learning and quad-radiomics. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2023;233: 104750.
Hu Z, Yang Z, Lafata KJ, et al. A radiomics-boosted deep-learning model for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia classification using chest x-ray images. Med Phys. 2022;49(5):3213–22.
Homayounieh F, Ebrahimian S, Babaei R, et al. CT radiomics, radiologists, and clinical information in predicting outcome of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Radiol: Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2(4):e200322.
Shiri I, Salimi Y, Pakbin M, et al. COVID-19 prognostic modeling using CT radiomic features and machine learning algorithms: analysis of a multi-institutional dataset of 14,339 patients. Comput Biol Med. 2022;145: 105467.
Huang G, Hui Z, Ren J, et al. Potential predictive value of CT radiomics features for treatment response in patients with COVID-19. Clin Respir J. 2023;17(5):394–404.
Sun Y, Salerno S, He X, et al. Use of machine learning to assess the prognostic utility of radiomic features for in-hospital COVID-19 mortality. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):7318.
Xiao F, Sun R, Sun W, et al. Radiomics analysis of chest CT to predict the overall survival for the severe patients of COVID-19 pneumonia. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(10): 105008.
Toussie D, Voutsinas N, Finkelstein M, et al. Clinical and chest radiography features determine patient outcomes in young and middle-aged adults with COVID-19. Radiology. 2020;297(1):E197–206.
Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):929–36.
Weiss P, Murdoch DR. Clinical course and mortality risk of severe COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1014–5.
Borghesi A, Maroldi R. COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: experimental chest X-ray scoring system for quantifying and monitoring disease progression. Radiol Med. 2020;125(5):509–13.
Sandler M, Howard A, Zhu M, et al. MobileNetV2: inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2018. pp. 4510–20.
Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, et al. ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE; 2009. pp. 248–55.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323–41.
Van Griethuysen JJ, Fedorov A, Parmar C, et al. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 2017;77(21):e104–7.
Aerts HJWL, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RTH, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):4006.
Peng C-YJ, Lee KL, Ingersoll GM. An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. J Educ Res. 2002;96(1):3–14.
Boulesteix AL, Janitza S, Kruppa J, et al. Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev: Data Mining Knowl Discov. 2012;2(6):493–507.
Shur JD, Doran SJ, Kumar S, et al. Radiomics in oncology: a practical guide. Radiographics. 2021;41(6):1717–32.
Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence; 1995. pp. 1137–43.
Bae J, Kapse S, Singh G, et al. Predicting mechanical ventilation and mortality in COVID-19 using radiomics and deep learning on chest radiographs: a multi-institutional study. Diagnostics. 2021;11(10):1812.
Aljouie AF, Almazroa A, Bokhari Y, et al. Early prediction of COVID-19 ventilation requirement and mortality from routinely collected baseline chest radiographs, laboratory, and clinical data with machine learning. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:2017–33.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds or grants were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization was led by SS and YR. Data curation were performed by RS, SP, WJ, TP, and WC. Formal analysis and investigation were carried out by SN, SK, SS, and YR, who also developed the methodology for this research. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SN and SK. SS and YR supervised the manuscript writing and provided guidance throughout the study. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose.
Ethics approval
This study involving retrospective patient data was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (IRB no. 505/64). All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was waived because this was a retrospective study of preexisting data which were de-identified.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Netprasert, Sa., Khongwirotphan, S., Seangsawang, R. et al. Predicting oxygen needs in COVID-19 patients using chest radiography multi-region radiomics. Radiol Phys Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00803-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00803-z