Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair of the Elbow—Biomechanics, Indications, and Outcomes

  • Injuries in Overhead Athletes (J Dines and C Camp, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Traditionally medial elbow injuries in overhead athletes have been treated with ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction as first described by Dr. Frank Jobe. Recent literature has shown favorable outcomes in select patients treated with UCL repair. Newer techniques utilizing suture augmentation demonstrate biomechanical profiles as good or better than the native state and/or reconstruction. This review aims to evaluate these biomechanical studies and the clinical outcomes of ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation.

Recent Findings

UCL repair has favorable outcomes in select patients with specific tear type patterns. Clinical outcomes have shown return to play rates of 92–97% with mean time of 2.5–6 months post-operatively. Biomechanical data comparing UCL repair to reconstruction techniques have shown improved resistance to common forces applied to the elbow during overhead activities. Additionally, suture tape augmentation dramatically improves stability of ligament repair without over-constraining the elbow.

Summary

Initial ulnar collateral ligament repair data was poor, and thus UCL reconstruction became the mainstay of treatment for overhead athletes. Recent studies evaluating the biomechanical properties as well as clinical outcomes have demonstrated favorable data when UCL repair is performed. When considering the drawbacks of a prolonged recovery associated with reconstruction, UCL repair is a viable option in select patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Morrey BF, An KN. Articular and ligamentous contributions to the stability of the elbow joint. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11:315–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658301100506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Richard MJ, Aldridge JM, Wiesler ER, Ruch DS. Traumatic valgus instability of the elbow: pathoanatomy and results of direct repair. Surgical technique J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:191–9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Erickson BJ, Nwachukwu BU, Rosas S, Schairer WW, McCormick FM, Bach BR, et al. Trends in medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in the United States: a retrospective review of a large private-payer database from 2007 to 2011. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:1770–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515580304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olsen SJ, Fleisig GS, Dun S, Loftice J, Andrews JR. Risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in adolescent baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:905–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505284188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rettig AC, Sherrill C, Snead DS, Mendler JC, Mieling P. Nonoperative treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries in throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:15–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290010601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smucny M, Westermann RW, Winters M, Schickendantz MS. Non-operative management of ulnar collateral ligament injuries in the throwing athlete. Phys Sportsmed. 2017;45:234–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2017.1358585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jobe FW, Stark H, Lombardo SJ. Reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament in athletes. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1986;68:1158–63. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198668080-00004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Makhni EC, Lee RW, Morrow ZS, Gualtieri AP, Gorroochurn P, Ahmad CS. Performance, return to competition, and reinjury after Tommy John surgery in major league baseball pitchers: a review of 147 cases. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1323–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514528864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Norwood LA, Shook JA, Andrews JR. Acute medial elbow ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 1981;9:16–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658100900103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conway JE, Jobe FW, Glousman RE, Pink M. Medial instability of the elbow in throwing athletes. Treatment by repair or reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1992;74:67–83. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274010-00009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Argo D, Trenhaile SW, Savoie FH, Field LD. Operative treatment of ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency of the elbow in female athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:431–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morrey BF, An KN. Functional anatomy of the ligaments of the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res NO. 1985;201:84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morrey BF, Tanaka S, An KN. Valgus stability of the elbow. A definition of primary and secondary constraints. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991:187–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199104000-00021.

  14. Park MC, Ahmad CS. Dynamic contributions of the flexor-pronator mass to elbow valgus stability. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 2004;86:2268–74. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200410000-00020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin F, Kohli N, Perlmutter S, Lim D, Nuber GW, Makhsous M. Muscle contribution to elbow joint valgus stability. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16:795–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Driscoll SW, Jaloszynski R, Morrey BF, An KN. Origin of the medial ulnar collateral ligament. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17:164–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-5023(92)90135-C.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Farrow LD, Mahoney AJ, Stefancin JJ, Taljanovic MS, Sheppard JE, Schickendantz MS. Quantitative analysis of the medial ulnar collateral ligament ulnar footprint and its relationship to the ulnar sublime tubercle. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1936–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511406220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Callaway GH, Field LD, Deng XH, Torzilli PA, O’Brien SJ, Altchek DW, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1997;79:1223–31. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199708000-00015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad CS, Lee TQ, ElAttrache NS. Biomechanical evaluation of a new ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique with interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:332–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465030310030201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bachmaier S, Wijdicks CA, Verma NN, Higgins LD, Greiner S. Biomechanical functional elbow restoration of acute ulnar collateral ligament tears: the role of internal bracing on gap formation and repair stabilization. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48:1884–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520921174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Werner SL, Fleisig GS, Dillman CJ, Andrews JR. Biomechanics of the elbow during baseball pitching. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;17:274–8. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1993.17.6.274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fleisig GS, Andrews JR, Dillman CJ, Escamilla RF. Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:233–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659502300218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ciccotti MG, Siegler S, Kuri JA, Thinnes JH, Murphy DJ IV. Comparison of the biomechanical profile of the intact ulnar collateral ligament with the modified Jobe and the docking reconstructed elbow: An in vitro study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:974–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508331136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson TJ, Jarrell SE, Adamson GJ, Chung KC, Lee TQ. Biomechanical differences of the anterior and posterior bands of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:2319–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3482-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mullen DJ, Goradia VK, Parks BG, Matthews LS. A biomechanical study of stability of the elbow to valgus stress before and after reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2002;11:259–64. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.122622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McAdams TR, Lee AT, Centeno J, Giori NJ, Lindsey DP. Two ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction methods: the docking technique versus bioabsorbable interference screw fixation-a biomechanical evaluation with cyclic loading. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16:224–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Urch E, Limpisvasti O, ElAttrache NS, Itami Y, McGarry MH, Photopoulos CD, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a modified internal brace construct for the treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries. Orthop J sport med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119874135provides evidence of benefits of placing suture augment inline with posterior band of anterior bundle.

  28. Dugas JR, Walters BL, Beason DP, Fleisig GS, Chronister JE. Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament repair with internal bracing versus modified Jobe reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:735–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515620390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jones CM, Beason DP, Dugas JR. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction versus repair with internal bracing: comparison of cyclic fatigue mechanics. Orthop J Sport Med. 2018;6:232596711875599. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118755991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bodendorfer BM, Looney AM, Lipkin SL, Nolton EC, Li J, Najarian RG, et al. Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with the docking technique versus repair with internal bracing. Am J sports med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518803771compares repair alone with intact, repair with augmentation and docking reconstruction techniques.

  31. Savoie FH, Trenhaile SW, Roberts J, Field LD, Ramsey JR. Primary repair of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow in young athletes: a case series of injuries to the proximal and distal ends of the ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1066–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508315201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ford GM, Genuario J, Kinkartz J, Githens T, Noonan T. Return-to-play outcomes in professional baseball players after medial ulnar collateral ligament injuries comparison of operative versus nonoperative treatment based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:723–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515621756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Azar FM, Andrews JR, Wilk KE, Groh D. Operative treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465000280011401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dugas JR, Looze CA, Jones CM, Walters BL, Rothermich MA, Emblom BA, et al. Ulnar collateral ligament repair with internal brace augmentation in amateur overhead throwing athletes. Orthop J Sport Med. 2018;6:2325967118S0008. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118s00084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dugas JR, Looze CA, Capogna B, et al. Ulnar collateral ligament repair with collagen-dipped FiberTape augmentation in overhead-throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519833684Provides clinical outcomes on a large number of patients demonstrating high levels of return to play.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cedars-Sinai, Kerlan-Jobe Institute, 6801 Park Terrace, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA

    Stephen J. Torres & Orr Limpisvasti

Authors
  1. Stephen J. Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Orr Limpisvasti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Torres.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Stephen Torres and Orr Limpisvasti declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Injuries in Overhead Athletes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torres, S.J., Limpisvasti, O. Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair of the Elbow—Biomechanics, Indications, and Outcomes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 14, 168–173 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-021-09698-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-021-09698-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation