Skip to main content
Log in

Assisted Reproductive Technology and Cardiovascular Risk in Women

  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To summarize what is currently known regarding the impact of assisted reproductive technology (ART) on the cardiovascular health of women, both during treatment and long-term, and to highlight specific at-risk subgroups and treatment considerations.

Recent Findings

Women utilizing ART are already at increased risk for cardiovascular pathology, and the association between ART and adverse pregnancy outcomes makes disentangling the individual contribution of ART to CVD risk challenging. Pregnancies conceived from ART are at increased risk for several complications including maternal venous thromboembolism and hypertensive disorders. The use of frozen embryo transfer and trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing appear to significantly increase the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Though limited, current available evidence suggests ART does not appear to be associated with an increased risk for long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Women with pre-existing cardiac disease require specialized care from a multi-disciplinary team but can be considered candidates for ART with use of a gestational carrier even if pregnancy is not deemed safe due to their underlying conditions.

Summary

More high-quality evidence is needed to better assess the short and long-term effects of ART on the cardiovascular health of women. ART for special populations, including those with pre-existing cardiac conditions, requires special consideration to minimize complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HR:

Hazard ratio

RR:

Relative risk

OR:

Odds ratio

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

BMI:

Body mass index

ART:

Assisted reproductive technology

IVF:

In vitro fertilization

ICSI:

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

FET:

Frozen embryo transfer

PGT:

Preimplantation genetic testing

HDP:

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

OHSS:

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: Final Data for 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021;70(2):1–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021. 2019 assisted reproductive technology fertility clinic and national summary report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  3. Quinn MM, Cedars MI. A Canary in the Coal Mine: Reproductive Health and Cardiovascular Disease in Women. Semin Reprod Med. 2017;35(3):250–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murugappan G, Li S, Alvero RJ, Luke B, Eisenberg ML. Association between infertility and all-cause mortality: analysis of US claims data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:57.e1-57.e11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murugappan G, Leonard SA, Farland LV, Lau ES, Shadyab AH, Wild RA, Schnatz P, Carmichael SL, Stefanick ML, Parikh NI. Association of infertility with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among postmenopausal participants in the Women’s Health Initiative. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(5):1038–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. •• Murugappan G, Li S, Lathi RB, Baker VL, Eisenberg ML. Increased risk of incident chronic medical conditions in infertile women: analysis of US claims data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(5):473.e1-473.e14. Large national insurance claims study demonstrating increased risk of cardiovascular disease in women with infertility compared to those without.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gleason JL, Shenassa ED, Thoma ME. Self-reported infertility, metabolic dysfunction, and cardiovascular events: a cross-sectional analysis among U.S. women. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(1):138–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. • Parikh NI, Gonzalez JM, Anderson CAM, Judd SE, Rexrode KM, Hlatky MA, Gunderson EP, Stuart JJ, Vaidya D; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and the Stroke Council. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Unique Opportunities for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(18): e902-e916. Statement that summarizes evidence that adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, gestational diabetes, small-for-gestational-age delivery, placental abruption, and pregnancy loss increase a woman’s risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and of developing subsequent CVD.

  9. Zhang J, Xu JH, Qu QQ, Zhong GQ. Risk of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Women: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7:55242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Wekker V, van Dammen L, Koning A, Heida KY, Painter RC, Limpens J, Laven JSE, Roeters van Lennep JE, Roseboom TJ, Hoek A. Long-term cardiometabolic disease risk in women with PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(6):942–960. Systematic review with 23 cohort studies quantifying the increased risk of cardiometabolic disease that women with PCOS experience.

  11. Mills G, Badeghiesh A, Suarthana E, Baghlaf H, Dahan MH. Associations between polycystic ovary syndrome and adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a population study of 9.1 million births. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(8):1914–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alur-Gupta S, Boland MR, Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Dokras A. Postpartum complications increased in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(3):280.e1-280.e13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. •• Farland LV, Degnan WJ 3rd, Bell ML, Kasner SE, Liberman AL, Shah DK, Rexrode KM, Missmer SA. Laparoscopically Confirmed Endometriosis and Risk of Incident Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study. Stroke. 2022:101161STROKEAHA122039250. Nurses’ Health Study II analysis demonstrating 34% increased risk of stroke in women with endometriosis with contribution of hypoestrogenic state quantified

  14. Mu F, Rich-Edwards J, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Forman JP, Missmer SA. Association Between Endometriosis and Hypercholesterolemia or Hypertension. Hypertension. 2017;70(1):59–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiang HJ, Lan KC, Yang YH, Chiang JY, Kung FT, Huang FJ, Lin YJ, Su YT, Sung PH. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in Taiwanese women with endometriosis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120(1 Pt 2):327–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Okoth K, Wang J, Zemedikun D, Thomas GN, Nirantharakumar K, Adderley NJ. Risk of cardiovascular outcomes among women with endometriosis in the United Kingdom: a retrospective matched cohort study. BJOG. 2021;128(10):1598–609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. •• Farland LV, Stern JE, Liu CL, Cabral HJ, Coddington CC 3rd, Diop H, Dukhovny D, Hwang S, Missmer SA. Pregnancy outcomes among women with endometriosis and fibroids: registry linkage study in Massachusetts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(6):829.e1-829.e14. Massachusetts linkage study demonstrating increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in women with endometriosis and in women with uterine fibroids.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lalani S, Choudhry AJ, Firth B, Bacal V, Walker M, Wen SW, Singh S, Amath A, Hodge M, Chen I. Endometriosis and adverse maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(10):1854–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Farland LV, Prescott J, Sasamoto N, Tobias DK, Gaskins AJ, Stuart JJ, Carusi DA, Chavarro JE, Horne AW, Rich-Edwards JW, Missmer SA. Endometriosis and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(3):527–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017;124(10):1501–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haan YC, Diemer FS, Van Der Woude L, Van Montfrans GA, Oehlers GP, Brewster LM. The risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in women with uterine fibroids. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20(4):718–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Henriksson P. Cardiovascular problems associated with IVF therapy. J Intern Med. 2021;289(1):2–11.

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujitake E, Jaspal R, Monasta L, Stampalija T, Lees C. Acute cardiovascular changes in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF), a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;248:245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Quien MM, Hausvater A, Maxwell SM, Weinberg CR. Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in Women With Heart Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9: 842556.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith J, Velez MP, Dayan N. Infertility, Infertility Treatment, and Cardiovascular Disease: An Overview. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:1959–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Levi-Setti PE, Di Segni N, Gargasole C, Ronchetti C, Cirillo F. Ovarian Hyperstimulation: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management. Semin Reprod Med. 2021;39(5–06):170–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim YY, Levine LD, Partington SL, Patel PA, Ruckdeschel E, Senapati S, Gracia CR. Successful in vitro fertilization in women with Fontan physiology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(12):3017–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Thunström S, Krantz E, Thunström E, Hanson C, Bryman I, Landin-Wilhelmsen K. Incidence of Aortic Dissection in Turner Syndrome. Circulation. 2019;139(24):2802–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grewal J, Valente AM, Egbe AC, Wu FM, Krieger EV, Sybert VP, van Hagen IM, Beauchesne LM, Rodriguez FH, Broberg CS, John A, Bradley EA, Roos-Hesselink JW, AARCC Investigators. Cardiovascular outcomes of pregnancy in Turner syndrome. Heart. 2021;107(1):61–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacobsen AF, Sandset PM. Prior thromboembolic disease and assisted reproductive therapy. Semin Reprod Med. 2021;39(5–06):180–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sennström M, Rova K, Hellgren M, Hjertberg R, Nord E, Thurn L, Lindqvist PG. Thromboembolism and in vitro fertilization - a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(9):1045–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Olausson N, Discacciati A, Nyman AI, Lundberg F, Hovatta O, Westerlund E, Wallén HN, Mobarrez F, Bottai M, Ekbom A, Henriksson P. Incidence of pulmonary and venous thromboembolism in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization with fresh respectively frozen-thawed embryo transfer: Nationwide cohort study. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(8):1965–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. • Wu P, Sharma GV, Mehta LS, Chew-Graham CA, Lundberg GP, Nerenberg KA, Graham MM, Chappell LC, Kadam UT, Jordan KP, Mamas MA. In-Hospital Complications in Pregnancies Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(5): e022658. National Inpatient Sample database study demonstrating increased risk of kidney injury and arrhythmias in over 100,000 ART pregnancies.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Conrad KP, von Versen-Höynck F, Baker VL. Potential role of the corpus luteum in maternal cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy and preeclampsia risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226:683–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Almasi-Hashiani A, Omani-Samani R, Mohammadi M, Amini P, Navid B, Alizadeh A, Khedmati Morasae E, Maroufizadeh S. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. •• Chih HJ, Elias FTS, Gaudet L, Velez MP. Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):449. Systematic review and meta-analysis including 85 studies demonstrating 70% increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in pregnancies conceived using IVF, particularly in frozen compared to fresh embryo transfer.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pelikh A, Smith KR, Myrskylä M, Goisis A. Medically Assisted Reproduction Treatment Types and Birth Outcomes: A Between-Family and Within-Family Analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(2):211–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Manna C, Lacconi V, Rizzo G, De Lorenzo A, Massimiani M. Placental Dysfunction in Assisted Reproductive Pregnancies: Perinatal, Neonatal and Adult Life Outcomes. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Luke B, Brown MB, Eisenberg ML, Callan C, Botting BJ, Pacey A, Sutcliffe AG, Baker VL. In vitro fertilization and risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: associations with treatment parameters. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(4):350.e1-350.e13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. •• Petersen S, Westvik-Johari K, Spangmose A, Pinborg A, Bergh C, Gissler M, Tiitinen A, Wennerholm U, Åsvold B, Romundstad L, Opdahl S. O-273 Risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy after fresh and frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproduction: A population-based cohort study with within sibship analysis. Hum Reprod. 2022;37 (Supplement_1). Analysis of 4.5 million pregnancies in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden demonstrating increased risk of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy in women undergoing FET, but not fresh transfer compared to pregnancies conceived without ART, including within sibship comparisons.

  41. Conrad KP, von Versen-Höynck F, Baker VL. Potential role of the corpus luteum in maternal cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy and preeclampsia risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(5):683–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pereira MM, Mainigi M, Strauss JF. Secretory products of the corpus luteum and preeclampsia. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(4):651–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. von Versen-Höynck F, Strauch NK, Liu J, Chi YY, Keller-Woods M, Conrad KP, Baker VL. Effect of mode of conception on maternal serum relaxin, creatinine, and sodium concentrations in an infertile population. Reprod Sci. 2019;26:412–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wiegel RE, Jan Danser AH, Steegers-Theunissen RPM, Laven JSE, Willemsen SP, Baker VL, Steegers EAP, von Versen-Höynck F. Determinants of maternal renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system activation in early pregnancy: insights from 2 cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105:3505–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. von Versen-Höynck F, Schaub AM, Chi YY, Chiu KH, Liu J, Lingis M, Stan Williams R, Rhoton-Vlasak A, Nichols WW, Fleischmann RR, Zhang W, Winn VD, Segal MS, Conrad KP, Baker VL. Increased preeclampsia risk and reduced aortic compliance with in vitro fertilization cycles in the absence of a corpus luteum. Hypertension. 2019;73:640–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. •• Wu H, Zhou P, Lin X, Wang S, Zhang S. Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(8):1913–26. Meta-analysis of 26 RCTs and 113 cohort studies comparing risk of HDP based on frozen embryo transfer protocol, demonstrating increased risk (OR 1.82) for protocols that do not result in a corpus luteum.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Asserhøj LL, Spangmose AL, Aaris Henningsen AK, Clausen TD, Ziebe S, Jensen RB, Pinborg A. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in 1,136 singleton pregnancies conceived after programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared with natural cycle FET. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:947–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bortoletto P, Cagino K, McCarter K, Forlenza K, Yau A, Prabhu M, Melnick AP. Association oftransfer of frozen embryos in the programmed cycle with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. AmJ Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(6):861–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang J, Wei M, Bian X, Wu L, Zhang S, Mao X, Wang B. Letrozole-induced frozen embryo transfer cycles are associated with a lower risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(1):59.e1-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Singh B, Reschke L, Segars J, Baker VL. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: the potential importance of the corpus luteum in preventing obstetrical complications. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:252–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Pohjonen EM, Söderström-Anttila V, Bergh C, Loft A, Magnusson Å, Pinborg A, Oldereid NB, Petzold M, Romundstad LB, Laivuori H. Obstetric and perinatal risks after the use of donor sperm: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;274:210–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Micelli E, Fatini C, Ralli E, Cirillo M, Romanelli C, Badolato L, Basile V, Picone R, Orlandi G, Giachini C, Evangelisti P, Fucci R, Cito G, Rizzello F, Coccia ME. Cardiometabolic and Thrombotic Risk Profile in Women Undergoing Oocyte Donation for Assisted Reproduction. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021;30(5):758–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang WY, von Versen-Höynck F, Kapphahn KI, Fleischmann RR, Zhao Q, Baker VL. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:283–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. •• Zheng W, Yang C, Yang S, Sun S, Mu M, Rao M, Zu R, Yan J, Ren B, Yang R, Guan Y. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from preimplantation genetic testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(6):989–1012. Meta-analysis demonstrating pregnancies conceived after trophectoderm biopsy have increased risk for HDP (HR 1.52).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hou W, Shi G, Ma Y, Liu Y, Lu M, Fan X, Sun Y. Impact of preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(4):990–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zheng W, Yang SH, Yang C, Ren BN, Sun SM, Liu YL, Yang RJ, Lou H, Zhang LL, Guan YC. Perinataloutcomes of singleton live births after preimplantation genetic testing during single frozen-thawedblastocyst transfer cycles: a propensity score-matched study. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(3):562–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Severino AI, Póvoa AM. Frozen Embryo Transfer and Preeclampsia Risk. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(9): 102167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Baksh S, Casper A, Christianson MS, Devine K, Doody KJ, Ehrhardt S, Hansen KR, Lathi RB, Timbo F, Usadi R, Vitek W, Shade DM, Segars J, Baker VL, NatPro Study Group. Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial. Trials. 2021;22:660.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Dayan N, Filion KB, Okano M, Kilmartin C, Reinblatt S, Landry T, Basso O, Udell JA. Cardiovascular Risk Following Fertility Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;5(70):1203–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bonetti NR, Meister TA, Soria R, Akhmedov A, Liberale L, Ministrini S, Dogar A, Lüscher TF, Messerli FH, Rexhaj E, Camici GG, Beer JH, Scherrer U. In vitro fertilization exacerbates stroke size and neurological disability in wildtype mice. Int J Cardiol. 2021;343:92–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Udell JA, Lu H, Redelmeier DA. Failure of fertility therapy and subsequent adverse cardiovascular events. CMAJ. 2017;189:E391–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Farland LV, Liu CL, Diop H, Cabral HJ, Missmer SA, Coddington CC, Hwang SS, Stern JE. Hospitalizations up to 8 years following delivery in assisted reproductive technology-treated and subfertile women. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(3):593–602.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Vassard D, Schmidt L, Pinborg A, Petersen GL, Forman JL, Hageman I, Glazer CH, Kamper-Jørgensen M. Mortality in women treated with assisted reproductive technology-addressing the healthy patient effect. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(9):1889–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Coddington CC, Gopal D, Cui X, Cabral H, Diop H, Stern JE. Influence of subfertility and assisted reproductive technology treatment on mortality of women after delivery. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:569-577.e1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

WRHR NIH NICHD Award # K12 HD103036, PI Andrew Satin, RD James Segars.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie L. Baker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Katherine Cameron, Barbara Luke, and Gaya Murugappan declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Valerie Baker receives support from the NICHD grant R01HD100341 to study the risk of hypertensive disorders following frozen embryo transfer.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cameron, K., Luke, B., Murugappan, G. et al. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Cardiovascular Risk in Women. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 18, 1–11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-023-00732-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-023-00732-3

Keywords

Navigation