Skip to main content
Log in

Matrix Effects in Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Antibiotic Multi-Detection Methods in Food Products with Animal Origins

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficiency of multi-detection screening methods, based on liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, has been proven in recent years. However, when simultaneously analyzing different groups of compounds with different physicochemical properties, the specificity of sample preparation has to be minimized. In mass spectrometry, this situation can lead to ion suppression or enhancement of signals due to interferences coming from the matrices. This phenomenon was studied to understand the real impact in routine analysis. Matrix interferences were monitored in extracts of milk, muscle, liver, and fish for 40 antibiotics using recently developed and validated multi-detection methods with ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Although a significant dispersion in the results was observed, for most of compounds, ion suppression is the major problem that, although it does not compromise the screening methods, can prevent the use of multi-detection for confirmation and quantification of antibiotic residues in food matrices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antignac J-P, Wasch K, Monteau F, De Brabander H, Andre F, Le Bizec B (2005) Anal Chim Acta 529:129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers E, Wagrowski-Diehl DM, Lu Z, Mazzeo JR (2007) J Chromatogr B 852:22–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dams R, Huestis MA, Lambert WE, Murphy CM (2003) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14:1290–1294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhaut AV, Lanckmans K, Sarre S, Smolders I, Michotte Y (2009) J Chromatogr B877:2198–2207

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002) Decision (2002/657/EC) of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC. Offic J Eur Commun L221:8–36

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Regulation (EC) No. 470/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009. Off J Eur Union L152:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) Commission Regulation (EU) No. 37/2010 of 22 December 2009. Off J Eur Union L15:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas A, Barbosa J, Ramos F (2013) Int Dairy J33:38–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas A, Barbosa J, Ramos F (2014a) Meat Sci 98:58–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas A, Leston S, Rosa J, Castilho MC, Barbosa J, Rema P, Pardal MA, Ramos F (2014b) Food Addit Contam Part A 31:817–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas A, Barbosa J, Ramos F (2015) J Chromatogr B 976-977:49–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosetti F, Mazzucco E, Zampieri D, Gennaro MC (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3929–3937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mei H, Hsieh Y, Nardo C, Xu X, Wang S, Ng K, Korfmacher WA (2003) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:97–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reig M, Toldrá F (2008) Food Anal Method 1:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remane D, Meyer MR, Wissenbach DK, Maurer HH (2010) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 24:3103–3108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestro L, Tarcomnicu I, Savu SR (2013) Matrix effects in mass spectrometry combined with separation methods – comparison HPLC, GC and discussion on methods to control these effects. In: Coelho AV, Franco CMF (eds) Tandem mass spectrometry – molecular characterization. InTech Publisher, Rijeka, pp 3–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Souverain S, Rudaz S, Veuthey J-L (2004) J Chromatogr A 1058:61–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang YY, Lu HF, Lin HY, Shin YC, Hwang DF (2012) Food Anal Method 5:1459–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ (2005) Clin Biochem 38:328–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trufelli H, Palma P, Famiglini G, Cappiello A (2011) Mass Spectrom 30:491–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this study was funded by FEDER through the Operational Program for Competitiveness Factors—COMPETE, through FCT—the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology—under the Project PTDC/AGR/ALI/122119/2010.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Conflict of Interest

Andreia Freitas, Jorge Barbosa, and Fernando Ramos declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Ramos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freitas, A., Barbosa, J. & Ramos, F. Matrix Effects in Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Antibiotic Multi-Detection Methods in Food Products with Animal Origins. Food Anal. Methods 9, 23–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0174-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0174-y

Keywords

Navigation