Abstract
The efficiency of multi-detection screening methods, based on liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, has been proven in recent years. However, when simultaneously analyzing different groups of compounds with different physicochemical properties, the specificity of sample preparation has to be minimized. In mass spectrometry, this situation can lead to ion suppression or enhancement of signals due to interferences coming from the matrices. This phenomenon was studied to understand the real impact in routine analysis. Matrix interferences were monitored in extracts of milk, muscle, liver, and fish for 40 antibiotics using recently developed and validated multi-detection methods with ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Although a significant dispersion in the results was observed, for most of compounds, ion suppression is the major problem that, although it does not compromise the screening methods, can prevent the use of multi-detection for confirmation and quantification of antibiotic residues in food matrices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antignac J-P, Wasch K, Monteau F, De Brabander H, Andre F, Le Bizec B (2005) Anal Chim Acta 529:129–136
Chambers E, Wagrowski-Diehl DM, Lu Z, Mazzeo JR (2007) J Chromatogr B 852:22–34
Dams R, Huestis MA, Lambert WE, Murphy CM (2003) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14:1290–1294
Eeckhaut AV, Lanckmans K, Sarre S, Smolders I, Michotte Y (2009) J Chromatogr B877:2198–2207
European Commission (2002) Decision (2002/657/EC) of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC. Offic J Eur Commun L221:8–36
European Commission (2009) Regulation (EC) No. 470/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009. Off J Eur Union L152:11–22
European Commission (2010) Commission Regulation (EU) No. 37/2010 of 22 December 2009. Off J Eur Union L15:1–72
Freitas A, Barbosa J, Ramos F (2013) Int Dairy J33:38–43
Freitas A, Barbosa J, Ramos F (2014a) Meat Sci 98:58–64
Freitas A, Leston S, Rosa J, Castilho MC, Barbosa J, Rema P, Pardal MA, Ramos F (2014b) Food Addit Contam Part A 31:817–826
Freitas A, Barbosa J, Ramos F (2015) J Chromatogr B 976-977:49–54
Gosetti F, Mazzucco E, Zampieri D, Gennaro MC (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3929–3937
Mei H, Hsieh Y, Nardo C, Xu X, Wang S, Ng K, Korfmacher WA (2003) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:97–103
Reig M, Toldrá F (2008) Food Anal Method 1:2–9
Remane D, Meyer MR, Wissenbach DK, Maurer HH (2010) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 24:3103–3108
Silvestro L, Tarcomnicu I, Savu SR (2013) Matrix effects in mass spectrometry combined with separation methods – comparison HPLC, GC and discussion on methods to control these effects. In: Coelho AV, Franco CMF (eds) Tandem mass spectrometry – molecular characterization. InTech Publisher, Rijeka, pp 3–37
Souverain S, Rudaz S, Veuthey J-L (2004) J Chromatogr A 1058:61–66
Tang YY, Lu HF, Lin HY, Shin YC, Hwang DF (2012) Food Anal Method 5:1459–1468
Taylor PJ (2005) Clin Biochem 38:328–334
Trufelli H, Palma P, Famiglini G, Cappiello A (2011) Mass Spectrom 30:491–509
Acknowledgments
Part of this study was funded by FEDER through the Operational Program for Competitiveness Factors—COMPETE, through FCT—the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology—under the Project PTDC/AGR/ALI/122119/2010.
Compliance with Ethics Requirements
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Conflict of Interest
Andreia Freitas, Jorge Barbosa, and Fernando Ramos declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freitas, A., Barbosa, J. & Ramos, F. Matrix Effects in Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Antibiotic Multi-Detection Methods in Food Products with Animal Origins. Food Anal. Methods 9, 23–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0174-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0174-y