Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Switchgrass, Big Bluestem, and Indiangrass Monocultures and Their Two- and Three-Way Mixtures for Bioenergy in the Northern Great Plains

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High yielding, native warm-season grasses could be used as renewable bioenergy feedstocks. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of warm season grass monocultures and mixtures on yield and chemical characteristics of harvested biomass and to evaluate the effect of initial seeding mixture on botanical composition over time. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), indiangrass [Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash], and big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman) were planted as monocultures and in all possible two- and three-way mixtures at three USA locations (Brookings and Pierre, SD and Morris, MN) during May 2002. Biomass at each location was harvested after a killing frost once annually from 2003 to 2005. Total biomass yield significantly increased with year at all locations. Switchgrass monocultures or mixtures containing switchgrass generally out-yielded big bluestem or indiangrass in monocultures or the binary mixture. Cellulose and hemicellulose concentrations were higher in 2004 and 2005 compared with 2003. Switchgrass or mixtures containing switchgrass tended to have less cellulose than either big bluestem or indiangrass. Results were more variable for total N, lignin, and ash. Switchgrass was the dominant component of all mixtures in which it was present while big bluestem was dominant when mixed with indiangrass. Indiangrass was maintained only in monocultures and declined over years when grown in mixtures at all locations. Our results indicated if biomass yield in the northern Great Plains is a primary objective, switchgrass should be a component of binary or tertiary mixtures that also contain big bluestem and/or indiangrass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

N:

Nitrogen

NDF:

Neutral detergent fiber

ADF:

Acid detergent fiber

ADL:

Acid detergent lignin

TN:

Total nitrogen

References

  1. Casler MD, Boe AR (2003) Cultivar × environment interactions in switchgrass. Crop Sci 43:2226–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McLaughlin SB, DeLaTorreUgarte DG, Garten CT, Lynd LR, Sanderson MA, Tolbert VR et al (2002) High-value renewable energy from prairie grasses. Environ Sci Technol 36:2122–2129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McLaughlin SB, Walsh ME (1998) Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 14:317–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Muir JP, Sanderson MA, Ocumpaugh WR, Jones RM, Reed RL (2001) Biomass production of ‘Alamo’ switchgrass in response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and row spacing. Agron J 93:896–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanderson MA, Read JC, Reed RL (1999) Harvest management of switchgrass for biomass feedstock and forage production. Agron J 91:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vogel KP, Brejda JJ, Walters DT, Buxton DR (2002) Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: harvest and nitrogen management. Agron J 94:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffith AP, Epplin FM, Fuhlendorf SD, Gillen R (2011) A comparison of perennial polycultures and monocultures for producing biomass for biorefinery feedstock. Agron J 103:617–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heggenstaller AH, Moore KJ, Liebman M, Anex RP (2009) Nitrogen influences biomass and nutrient partitioning by perennial, warm-season grasses. Agron J 101:1363–1371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Waramit N, Moore KJ, Heggenstaller AH (2011) Composition of native warm-season grasses for bioenergy production in response to nitrogen fertilization rate and harvest date. Agron J 103:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore KJ, Boote KJ, Sanderson MA et al (2004) Physiology and developmental morphology. In: Moser LE (ed) Warm-season (C4) grasses. Agronomy Monograph No. 45. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, pp 179–216

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee DK, Owens VN, Doolittle JJ (2007) Switchgrass and soil carbon sequestration response to ammonium nitrate, manure, and harvest frequency on conservation reserve program land. Agron J 99:462–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McLaughlin SB, Samson R, Bransby D, Wiselogel A (1996) Evaluating physical, chemical, and energetic properties of perennial grasses as biofuels. In: Abstracts of BioEnergy ’96—The Seventh National Bioenergy Conference: Partnerships to Develop and Apply Biomass Technologies, Nashville, TN. September 15–20

  13. Garten CT, Wullschleger SD (2000) Soil carbon dynamics beneath switchgrass as indicated by stable isotope analysis. J Environ Qual 29:645–653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liebig MA, Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB (2008) Soil carbon storage by switchgrass grown for bioenergy. Bioenerg Res 1:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mulkey VR, Owens VN, Lee DK (2006) Management of switchgrass-dominated conservation reserve program lands for biomass production in South Dakota. Crop Sci 46:712–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Deimer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG et al (1999) Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123–1127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tilman D, Reich P, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C (2001) Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294:843–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tilman D (1996) Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77:350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grime JP (1997) Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science 277:1260–1261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: reevaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DeHaan LR, Weisberg S, Tilman D, Fornara D (2010) Agricultural and biofuel implications of a species diversity experiment with native perennial grassland plants. Agric Ecosyst Environ 137:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK (2008) Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:464–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mulkey VR, Owens VN, Lee DK (2008) Management of warm-season grass mixtures for biomass production in South Dakota USA. Bioresour Technol 99:609–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia-Ciudad A, Garcia-Criado B, Perez-Corona ME, Vazquez de Aldana BR, Ruano-Ramos AM (1993) Application of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to chemical analysis of heterogeneous and botanically complex grassland samples. J Sci Food Agric 63:419–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Undersander D, Mertens DD, Thiex N (1993) Total ash in forages. Forage Analysis Procedures. National Forage Testing Association, Omaha

    Google Scholar 

  27. SAS Institute (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Inst, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (eds) (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fuentes RG, Taliaferro CM (2002) Biomass yield stability of switchgrass cultivars. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) Trends in new crops and uses. ASHS, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  30. Briggs JM, Knapp AK (1995) Interannual variability in primary production in tallgrass prairie: climate, soil moisture, topographic position, and fire as determinants of aboveground biomass. Am J Bot 82:1024–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shiflet TN, Dietz HE (1973) Relationship between precipitation and annual rangeland herbage production in Southeastern Kansas. J Range Manage 27:272–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smart AJ, Dunn BH, Johnson PS, Xu L, Gates RN (2007) Using weather data to explain herbage yield on three great plains plant communities. Rangel Ecol Manag 60:146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee DK, Boe A (2005) Biomass production of switchgrass in central South Dakota. Crop Sci 45:2583–2590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Picasso VD, Brummer EC, Liebman M, Dixon PM, Wilsey BJ (2011) Diverse perennial crop mixtures sustain higher productivity over time based on ecological complementarity. J Renew Agric Food Syst 26:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Picasso VD, Brummer EC, Liebman M, Dixon PM, Wilsey BJ (2008) Crop species diversity affects productivity and weed suppression in perennial polycultures under two management strategies. Crop Sci 48:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weaver JE (1954) The North American Prairie. Johnsen, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  37. Springer TL, Aiken GE, McNew RW (2001) Combining ability of binary mixtures of native warm-season grasses and legumes. Crop Sci 41:818–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Miryang Campus Pusan National University, 50 Cheonghak-Ri Samryangjin-Eup, Miryng, 627-706, South Korea

    C. O. Hong

  2. Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, 1110 Rotunda Lane North, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA

    V. N. Owens & A. Boe

  3. Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    D. K. Lee

Authors
  1. C. O. Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. N. Owens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. K. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Boe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. N. Owens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, C.O., Owens, V.N., Lee, D.K. et al. Switchgrass, Big Bluestem, and Indiangrass Monocultures and Their Two- and Three-Way Mixtures for Bioenergy in the Northern Great Plains. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 229–239 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9252-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9252-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation