Skip to main content
Log in

Lies, Damn Lies and Placebos: A Comment on Foreid et al

  • Letter
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Foreid, H., C. Bentes, and J. Pimentel. 2010. The use of placebo as a provocative test in the diagnosis of psychogenic non epileptic seizures. Neuroethics 3: 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ryan, C.J., G. De Moore, and M. Patfield. 1995. Becoming none but tradesmen: Lies, deception and psychotic patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 21: 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jobst, B.C., and P.D. Williamson. 2005. Frontal lobe seizures. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 28: 635–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Walczak, T., D. Williams, and W. Berten. 1994. Utility and reliability of placebo infusion in the evaluation of patients with seizures. Neurology 33(3): 394–399.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher James Ryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, C.J. Lies, Damn Lies and Placebos: A Comment on Foreid et al. Neuroethics 4, 261–262 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-010-9086-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-010-9086-0

Keywords

Navigation